BREAKING: Libya Makes Huge Announcement About What They Just Found in Benghazi

Apr 9, 2015

From The Conservative Tribune:
(http://conservativetribune.com/libya-announcement-benghazi/)

The Benghazi incident just keeps coming back up like an indigestible meal for President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Now, a committee within Libya’s internationally recognized parliament in Tobruk claims that it has new information regarding the perpetrators of the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi on Sept. 11, 2012.

The committee’s deputy head, Tareq Saqar al-Jeruchi, said his team would travel to the United States and share the information with Congress and the FBI.

Christopher Stevens, America’s ambassador to Libya at the time, along with three other Americans, were killed in the attack. Washington believes the attack was carried out by Ansar al-Sharia, a jihadist group and known terrorist organization.
The new information from the Libyan committee, however, has not been released to the public. This makes some wonder if the Libyan parliament really has made any recent discovery about the Benghazi attack (H/T Breitbart).

So what could this new discovery be? The Conservative Tribune reviewed some older news reports to determine what information this committee could have.

Approximately one year ago, the British Daily Mail reported that an organization of CIA insiders, former top military officers and members of relevant think-tanks — calling itself the Citizens Commission on Benghazi — stated that the Benghazi attacks were possible because the United States had been arming Al Qaeda in Libya one year earlier.

Initially, the weapons, costing around $500 million, were intended for former Libyan strongman Moammar Gadhafi. Instead, the United States “switched sides in the war on terror, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known Al Qaeda militias and figures,” said commission member Clare Lopez, a former CIA officer.

The aim of the Obama administration was to topple Gadhafi. Granted, he had caused trouble for the United States earlier, most notably during the Reagan administration, but, by the second decade of the 21st century, he was working closely and actively with the West to suppress Al Qaeda, as explained in the commission’s interim report (H/T U.K. Daily Mail).

(Excerpt)

Read more:
http://woundedamericanwarrior.com/b...ent-about-what-they-just-found-in-benghazi-2/

There's been a lot of speculation, that the phony story blaming the Benghazi attack on an anti-Muslim YouTube video, which angered Libyans, was actually a lie quickly devised explanation to keep the American people from discovering that the Obama administration, with Hillary Clinton as secretary of state, made the Benghazi attack possible. Isn’t that treason? I just keep wondering if the flight that is scheduled to bring them to the United States will ever make it? If they somehow survive the trip will the Lame Stream Media co-conspirators of this administration even report their testimony before the Congressional Committee led by the Honorable Trey Gowdy? I wonder how the honorable Jeremiah Cummins will handle this? INMH, if this testimony becomes public at the hearing Progressive Democrats will be scurrying to hide.

 

Needs verification but if true has some serious ramifications for Obama, Hillary, and Cummings.

 

I like this bizarro world where the United States can knowingly and intentionally be arming al-Qaeda. Well actually I wouldn't, but you get the point.

Carry on with 'BENGHAZI', as you will.

 

Doubtful anything will happen if this is true. Congress as a whole is spineless and no R is going to delve to deep into this because of the CIA's involment....

- - - Updated - - -

See Syria.....

 

I agree with you. I posted it because if the allegations turn out to be true will even the Democrats that have protected Obama all this time still stand by him?

 

I love these raw stories, especially if they have legs.

The libs here haven't got their marching orders yet, so they will be contained to making benign comments until they do.

 

Expect any and all 2016 Democratic candidates to dump Obama like a bad habit, no matter if this has legs or not. My opinion is someone relatively unknown will take the Democratic Party ticket, and that person will not be talking well about Obama.

Hillary may be the front runner today, but her polls are dropping like a rock, and she lost the last election to an unknown community organizer.

 

I'm not sure just how much control Obama has over that crowd.

Remember, he's dealing with the military-industrial complex Eisenhower warned us about.

Really, if he knows everything they're up to, what is he supposed to do--go to FOX News and complain?

 

He can go to NBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, or Al Jazeera and complain. Actually FOX would probably be glad to have him on, they'll just demand equal time which this PO(TU)S will not agree to. The last time he was on FOX (was it 4 years ago now?) O'Reilly handed him his ass. He's afraid to do that again.

 

Let's be honest, hillary could have handed weapons to terrorists and the left wouldn't care.

By this point it's scorched earth between the left and right.

 

Ah, yes, a news site called the Conservative Tribune citing the Daily Mail. Very reliable.

 

Well, we can rule out Al Jazeera for obvious reasons.

That leaves out four other US TV stations also firmly in control of the neocons through the 0.01%.

Any other good ideas? The BBC? How many Americans actually listen to that?

FOX has its viewers so brainwashed that God could personally appear on it and announce the Second Coming and they would make fun of it.

What would you do if you were him and didn't want to get us in a war?

- - - Updated - - -

Hillary appears to be in with the neocons as deeply as Bush was.

 

As with Obama...

 

Try France 24/7 there is an English Channel.

 

Really? Nothing, not one single affront to America, sticks to these Dem scumbags. IRS? Gone. F&F? Gone with contempt of Congress and documented perjury. Hacking reporters? Gone.

No Dem crime is followed to conclusion. Dinesh D'sousa? They got him big time, didn't they.

All this offers up plenty of reasons anyone might need to shrug. Stop playing this rigged game. The country is irreparably corrupted.

 

Of course they will.

By any means necessary, Baby! Don't you know that?

Not only will they defend Obama, they will line up behind an even bigger liar, Hillary.

 

HELLO?!.....we just did the exact same thing in Yemen. Al-Qaeda is coming out of the hills to attack the Houtis with our weapons that we cannot account for. While the Houtis are being bombed by the Saudi Arab Coalition. This is 18th century British Colonialism 101, arm the minorities to keep the political structure dependent on your defense.

 

Yes, of course they will RELIGIOUSLY continue to stand by Barack no matter what. The elitist types would probably applaud their Political Messiah for his 'bold and innovative' foreign policy strategy while their low-information types would at most simply shrug and say, "Who gives a fluke about that Ben Ghazi guy anyway?" Meanwhile the Mainstream Media would be spinning and covering for Obama for all that they were worth as leftists.

So absolutely nothing would change. Still it would be nice to know the truth even if the average leftist has no use for the thing and wouldn't even recognize the truth were Barack Obama ever to inadvertently mutter it..

 

It's also old style Socialistic tactics 101 and Barack Obama IS an old style socialist. Nice, eh?

 

The Yemen project started in 2002, give an example of it being a socialist tactic and not just a British monarchy tactic and I will spare you boys kissing. That's easy enough.

 

As Obama is already doing?

I agree. He has little in the way of other options to keep us out of war and protect Iran from neocon insanity.

Not to mention Ukraine and goodness knows where else.

All they want is to enable outrageous loans and the subsequent stripping of resources, as is happening in Greece. If it takes war to do that, they can find a country somewhere. We have been passive recipients of a rollout of several options lately.

 

Now that is what I call outstanding news reporting.

The entire thing is pure and utter speculation, based on a report that a Libyan government source has NEW INFORMATION that they are bringing to the US.
Since these clowns have NO CLUE what the information could be, naturally they reach back to various old unsubstantiated accusations and speculations.

And naturally there is a segment that just laps this crap up as if its gospel.

I realize the irony is lost on them and their followers, but if this is an example of how they are in "defense of western civilization", then they represent that part of western civilization that sure as hell doesn't merit defending or saving.

 

Hey in the modern era everybody is now a thoroughly conditioned leftwinger so far as knowing the 'safe' response to generate and therefore remain in mandatory adherence to Political Correctness doctrine and thus everyone on Earth just adores seeing boys kissing boys . . . and so knock your (forgive the obvious allusion) socks off in that regard.

 

What are you guys talking about? Why would Obama arm Al queda?

 

Because he hates America /s


Seriously, I can't believe how extreme this site is. People actually consider every political enemy they have to be downright evil. Suddenly the House of Commons looks like a lovely place.