Pork placed on body of dead terrorist....should we do this also?

Apply the same time, money and energy toward killing another Islamic Terrorist.

This would be far better use of the resources.

-

 

I noticed you completely skipped my point.

 

You're avoiding the question, so here it is again: please show us Muslims who will condemn the Qur'an for certain things.

If you can't do that then I argue that I'm right and you are wrong.

 

Your point was the the Christian-majority country I live in is great due to Christian values. But, for example, our greatest crime was slavery, and we got rid of slavery DESPITE the biblical teachings (which approve of slavery, and jesus accepted slavery as well), we became more like Modern Secular Humanism is. We now allow gay marriage DESPITE the Bible/Jesus. Jesus never spoke up for gays, even though he knows that the main book about him says to kill them (he's immoral!), he probably hated gays as much as he hates, say, hell-bound (that's all of them) Hindus.
We have women's rights DESPITE the bible saying women are inferior, and Christians are too immoral to remove those parts of their book.

 

Stop setting the bar so high, Jeez. If it stops A FEW attacks then it's worth it, it doesn't NEED to stop all of them. Fewer dead innocent people is worth a dead terrorist not having his illogical ancient superstitions honored, come on!

 

How is that on their level? Putting a piece of meat on someone scares you that much?

Plus, they aren't human. They are savage animals. Zero sympathy from me.

Keep up the pork graves!

 

You seem pretty skilled at avoiding questions: can you condemn them for approving of the Qur'an, or is making moral judgments not a part of your ideology?

 

Uh........I just stated that it doesn't matter how many lives for bacon and I could care less about pork chops. I don't care if a million people are saved if it costs even the loss of one single piece of bacon. No one is worth as much as bacon.

 

Questioning faith scares people (even secularists, I'm afraid.) They see it as a BAD thing if faith is used against people who have faith. I don't! Use their illogical superstitions against our enemies who are trying to kill us.

 

Speaking of "savages", their texts say to kill innocent gays - can we agree that any texts that say to kill innocent gays are savage beyond compare? Can we? We await your answer.

- - - Updated - - -

You Baconists.....I admire your dedication to your religion.

 

http://unitedchurchofbacon.org/

 

Strawman.

"Modern Secular Humanists" are simply atheists trying to disguise their ideology by adding a few more words and a set of principles that they will likely bend on in the name of political expediency. It's also a way for atheists to escape the mindblowing atrocities committed during the 20th century by fellow left-wing atheists. There's blood on everybody's hands. The point I was making is that Christianity has been able to adapt to the modern era far more than Islam. Islam is really not capable of adapting in this way, due to the way it is structured. The religion establishes the entire society. Most of the Qur'an deals with how to run a society. It'll never be able to co-exist in the West in any meaningful way. I think it's simply ridiculous that you would claim Christianity is as bad as Islam while you sit there in the lap of luxury compared to most of the world. Go live in a majority Muslim country for a few years so your rhetoric can transcend theory.

 

I worship the Flying Spaghetti Monster, but I'm thinking about converting to your religion, since I like bacon better than spaghetti (as blasphemous as that sounds.)

 

Monetary/wealth levels are not the only measure of a great society.
No, we've MOVED BEYOND the communist atrocities by embracing democratic systems of gov't. I condemn communism/totalitarianism. Jesus/Mohammad/Moses/god didn't understand democracy, but MSH of course does. A far better belief system than religions.

One reason that yes, in certain cases Christianity is better than Islam is that Christians FOLLOW their religious texts less than Muslims do. The LESS Christianity/Islam are followed, the better. Or are you going to stone people for not following the Sabbath? (Or did god get this one wrong, which is it?)

- - - Updated - - -

I'm not sure that people like Questerr fully understand this, such as Qur'an 9:29 which says that non-Muslim Questerr is a second-class citizen under Islamic Rule. Islam is a political system, disguised as a religion.

 

Are you arguing all Muslims are devout believers who believe everything in the Koran?

- - - Updated - - -

Not all Muslims believe everything in the Koran or agree with everything in the Koran, just like Christians and the Bible.

 

If I believed this was a serious post I would give this a serous response.. but since I believe this is a joke post, here's an animated gif of Tom Hanks and Frankenstein's monster

 

Your whole premise is based on your own ignorance of what you think Muslims believe. It's true that eating pork in most contexts is forbidden in Islam, but the Quran says God will be "forgiving and kind" in others.

an-Nahl 16:115 "he has forbidden carrion and blood and the flesh of the swine, and what has been killed in the name of any other God; but if one is driven by necessity without craving or reverting to it, then God is forgiving and kind"

it would offer no deterrence.

 

Show us your evidence of Muslims who will actually say that Allah got it wrong regarding the atrocities, such as crucifixions!

 

No, that's misleading! Show us where, say, Gandhi will be spared eternal torture because he did good works. ALLAH IS NOT FORGIVING AND KIND, if Gandhi roasts, over and over, and his skin re-grows back, in a warped attempt to torture him even more. If HITLER said some nice things does that excuse him?

- - - Updated - - -

But apparently the terrorists "MISUNDERSTAND" ISLAM terribly, so I doubt they'd agree with you! Or do the terrorists understand Islam very very well....which is it?

- - - Updated - - -

You seem to be under the mis-belief that the Islamic texts do NOT say a Muslim gets 72 virgins for dying for Allah, AND that pork is unclean.

 

1. Pork being unclean does not equate to an already dead body being touched by pork preventing the spirit from reaching paradise.

2. I find it hard to believe anyone is that stupid to believe such a thing would do anything to prevent terrorism. Hence, I believe it is a joke post

I believe you know all this, and you are actually an intelligent person pretending to be unintelligent to get a reaction out of people

 

So for #1, we're better off going with bacon bullets? In that case, a living body is killed by an unclean object. That should do the trick in preventing them from going to heaven and getting all those virgins?

 

`
Didn't the British start using a pig product on guns, in India, which started a revolt?

 

Lol...You mean like the ones who propose doing it?
Why would she want to wallow in their barbarian fantasies?
Anyone with any class or intelligence would consider such notions puerile.

 

One of my friends is a Muslim Feminist. Do you seriously think she believes or agrees with everything in the Koran?

 

if it prevents just one Muslim terrorist, its worth it.