Oh my, witch witch is witch? It appears Hillary would never be able to own a gun for her domestic abuse towards Bill. A new book revealing the Hillary temper and wrath is more evidence for Americans to not vote for her http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/14/roger-stone-eviscerates-the-clintons-in-new-book/ Hillary Clinton is finally facing the sniper fire she imagined she caught in Bosnia as First Lady. Roger Stones The Clintons War on Women was released Tuesday, on the day Hillary finally had to debate the other Democratic candidates an ordeal the Democratic National Committee and Debbie Wasserman-Schultz have tried to spare her. The book recounts the stories of about two dozen women, beginning with one of Bill Clintons college classmates, who have stepped forward to claim that President Clinton sexually assaulted them. Some of the women received settlements of hundreds of thousands of dollars, some of them claim to have had their pets killed, their jobs terminated, their businesses audited by the IRS, their tires slashed, or to have received odd phone calls or queries from strange bypassing joggers about the health of their children.
I don't, especially from liberals on this forum The author of the book indicates the info came from credible sources, so why would I not believe it when Hillary has a history of lying and throwing her little hissy fits. Would you want her to own a gun?
That Bill Clinton sexual assault charges sounds vaguely reminiscent of the Bill Cosby accusations. Two DOZEN women? And the payoffs ... hm... maybe it's a "Bill" thing!
Forget a gun, could we ever trust a mental case like her to have her finger anywhere near "the button"?
Sounds like a talking point response to me.... Someone I used to work with had a relative who worked in the WH when the Clintons were there. The person I knew said the person they were related to told many stories that would seem to indicate all these Hillary Behind Closed Doors stories have some merit to them. Not the "they killed my dog" type stories, but that she is temperamental and is inclined to violent outbursts. Some of these were recounted to me in detail, but I don't care to repeat them because I might not recall all the details correctly. I wasn't there so I don't "know" anything first hand, but there seems to be a lot of these stories floating around, and, noticeably, not a lot of "Hillary was a lovely person to work with" stories. I take them all with a grain of salt, but if someone is declaring them absolutely not true or absolutely true either one, I would like to hear what is their basis for their declaration.
Well, then, the author certainly knows that he can be sued for libel. What do you want to bet that the Clintons do NOT sue because they can't? It's true. There was another book about the Clinton Obama feud. It put both in a terrible light, but there was no lawsuit. If my reputation was besmirched and I knew the author was lying, I would sue. Perhaps you shouldn't believe that the Clintons are such wonderful people. Obviously they know they aren't.
It's a sure sign that the previous non-scandal is dead in the water, when a new one pops up. RIP Benghazi, but it's about (*)(*)(*)(*)ing time. Second House Republican Admits Benghazi Investigation Is A Plot To Get Hillary Clinton http://www.politicususa.com/2015/10...ghazi-investigation-plot-hillary-clinton.html
Do you know that had it not been for a Benghazi investigation her private email server would have likely gone unnoticed? That's a plus IMO.
