Why are blacks so offended by the idea of a white country?

White people are going extinct at an alarming rate. To stop this we need our own country. But every time a self respectable white person proposes such an idea he offends the black man. Why? I am not in the least offended by blacks having their own countries. Is it just an insecurity or phobia that we will oppress them again?

 

hardly

 

This racist thread can only get worse and needs to be removed.

 

It's Karma because the Caucasians stole the land away from the Native American Indians.

 

Yeah, lets not forget Genghis Kahn and his invasion of Europe and bastardizing our bloodlines.

 

and its karma the caucasians took it from the native americans because they slaughtered and killed other tribes who had the land before they did... none of the tribes we recognize today, were the original land owners either, they were the last ones to slaughter other tribes and take it from them... or do you reject the notion native american tribes slaughtered other tribes to steal their land, rape their women, and murder their children? let me guess "its different" when they did it?

who will natives apologize to, when they killed them all and extinguished their blood lines, so there is nobody to give reparations to, they killed them all...

 

So, when are you moving back to Europe?

 

Oh got him, nice zinger there bruh

 

No we’re not.

I suspect it offends black people when it’s their own home country you’re suggesting should be a white country (typically the USA). After all, how would you respond to the idea that America should be a black country and all the whites should be encouraged to go back to Europe?

 

Move to Russia. They seem to have the same attitude as you.

 

Are you doing your part and have lots of babies to keep the white race going?

 

Where are whites going to move to?

 

Yeah, the last two world wars didn't do much for our demographics, and the next one won't either. The vast majority of the "boots on the ground" will be white, and once again they will be slaughtered like fish in a barrel. Another draft of white males for another war will mean the end of the white race--that is why there will be a draft. While they are away fighting the good fight, the Syrian, African, Mexican, etc., will come to take their places. While we will be fighting Syrian terrorists, the Syrians will be fat and happy on Johnny's dollar.

 

I assume that you've never served in the military and so you don't know that our fighting force has a healthy tan.

 

without whites, their live standard will be as low as 1000 years ago.

whites protect blacks from yellows, japanese army can be very bad to blacks.

That's THE two reasons they do not want whites leave them alone.

 

Well, as an older woman, I have to say that no I have not served in the military. They said there was a healthy tan in WWll also, but the only tans were the ones burying the white soldiers, and standing by the mess and supply tents. Since the white race is the minority in this world, we should not be expected to sacrifice anymore than we already have. And if they draft my sons, I will go ballistic.

It should be interesting to see the one white, one red, one yellow, one brown, one black, one transvestite, one straight, one gay, and one woman line-up. Comaraderie is important. I don't know for sure, but I don't think its going to happen in this military. Take Russia for example: One hundred percent white Russian males (for the most part) who all speak excellent Russian. No cultural misunderstandings there.

 

It is true, the blacker your skin the more contempt people throughout the world have for you. In India, the "untouchables" are the darker-skinned Indians. In China, the peasants that catered to the upper class were the darker-skinned Chinese. These weren't treated with any amount of compassion. I wonder why that is? Is it just the color of the skin, or could there be another reason?

 

Where are blacks going to get the food stamps, section 8 housing, and cash stipends from if the whites consolidate? They know who, for the most part, subsidizes their living expenses. To watch them lose all that would be interesting to watch on satellite TV. You would think they would show a little gratitude towards their benefactors. But they just whine some more; and the more you do for them, the louder they whine.

 

That’s rubbish. There were plenty on non-whites directly involved in the fighting of WWII. There was certainly a white majority because it was primarily a European conflict, generally only extending in to Africa and Asia via European colonies. There is a different with the Pacific theatre of course – roughly half the people fighting there won’t have been white for an obvious reason.

That’s relevant in the hypothetical (to some people fantasy) WWIII centred in North Africa and Asia too. What makes you imagine a war there, with largely white soldiers on one side and largely African/Asia soldiers on the other, surrounded by Asian/African civilians, that it would be white people who suffer the most deaths?

 

I am a little old to be procreating. I hope my children don't have children though. I do not want my grandchildren being forced to convert to Islam, or having the dumb, black, and brown whip hands over them. The rule of law is breaking down all over the world, and whitey is getting the blame for it all. There is craziness and violence everywhere. Minorities have been indoctrinated with the notion that all their failures in life are whitey's fault, and the worse things get the more whitey will be targeted. My grandchildren will be enslaved because of the $18 trillion nation debt. They will be taxed to death. They will be used as canon fodder. Their children will be subject to insults and false accusations about their race; they will be abused in school like they are now.

Make a list of all the negatives about our world, and then make a list of all the positives. Which is there more of--negatives or positives?

Even animals don't reproduce if their environment is not going to support their offspring; and our environment will not support in a safe, and abundant manner their offspring.

My sons pretty well know that the world is not a sane place to have children. They have conceal carry permits to stay safe. Why would they risk having children. Nothing is going to change.

My only satisfaction in all this is knowing that when the white race goes, everyone goes. You can't have affirmative action, wash cloth salesmen in charge of the Nuclear Regulatory System and expect to survive; and that is what we have, and it is only going to get worse. Obama is a good example of this.

 

White guy with a gun gets talked down by police. Different color, different rules for engagement.

[video=youtube;GQwlfXdDDYA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQwlfXdDDYA[/video]

 

It sounds like your version of the last World Wars is the new version, where minorities made up most of the casualties. Have you seen pictures of the assault on the Beaches of Normandy? Not one of those 6000 men were black or brown, or Asian. Everyone of the dead were white, no exceptions. Have you seen pictures of the assault on Iwo Jima? The only 'action' the blacks saw was carrying the dead and wounded off the hills, dishing out supplies, and cooking for the brass.
Look at the pictures. I have looked at thousands, and even drawn some of them. Not one picture that I have seen of World War l and ll had minority fighting forces in it, except for the squadron of black fighter pilots and the 'wind whisperers' and I imagine these are mostly hype. They are never mentioned by tried and true war historians. Hispanics never served either.
You are plain and simply wrong about which Americans fought and died in those wars. All the white crosses in all the military cemeteries, over here and in Europe are 99.9% all white Christians.

 

Presumably because you didn’t actually read my post, in which I said “There was certainly a white majority because it was primarily a European conflict”. You don’t need a strawman, I’m standing right here.

You seem to have something of an American-centric view (somewhat Ironic considering it was a World War). As I’d already suggested, most of the non-white soldiers I was thinking of would have been European colonials (e.g. http://rarehistoricalphotos.com/black-soldiers-fighting-france-1944/). They were very much involved in fighting (and the dying), in the colonies themselves and even in Europe itself. You also ignored the Pacific theatre which, of course, involved lots of non-white people fighting and dying.

I’m not at all surprised if the US Military of the time treated it’s black soldiers differently and you can hardly blame the black soldiers for “not dying enough” as such, when it was active discrimination that largely kept them off the front lines for much of the war. It seems your statement that “every one of the dead were white, no exceptions” wasn’t actually true though (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_African_Americans#World_War_II).

 

I recommend that you gentlemen read this thread:

https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1121781/

Why would I be offended? Its rationale from their POV. Blacks seem to hate whites anyways and are convinced that we oppress them. We are giving them freedom to go back to their own continent.

 

Why is this?

I think cops probably have a little bias against blacks considering they are way more likely to be shot by a black man. But what annoys me is how blacks deal with this fact. Instead of rationally accepting that this is true, and reflecting on themselves and improving as individual representatives of their race, they just (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) and cry and say its unfair. They lose respect from a lot of whites when they do this. Then they actually blame the police officers saying how its totally unfounded for them to treat them with bias. Crazy and ridiculous.