Are most New Atheists former fundamentalists?

Discussion in 'Religion & Philosophy' started by SpaceCricket79, Nov 11, 2015.

  1. surreptitious57

    surreptitious57 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2015
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    I became an atheist five years ago while New Atheism was in its ascendancy though I always regarded myself as simply
    atheist and nothing else. I was however initially very literal and binary in my thinking but have since graduated to a more
    nuanced position. I am now an apatheist which is a subset of atheism. But one that is entirely accepting of the possibility
    of God existing without actually thinking he exists. My more general philosophical world view is existential nihilism which
    has been arrived at through my understanding of cosmology rather than of religion. Although in so far as religion itself is
    concerned I do not really care what anyone thinks or believes long as they do not harm others as a consequence of that
     
  2. it's just me

    it's just me Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2014
    Messages:
    3,269
    Likes Received:
    381
    Trophy Points:
    83
    No, you really can't take any of them two ways. The only way you can take them is the way the original audience was meant to take them, and that takes some study. Most people are too lazy or too bigoted to do that, mostly bigoted.
     
  3. Munster

    Munster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2015
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am a non-believer and in my past I was a Christian. I can't say I was a fundamentalist. I can say I was influenced by fundamentalism but I can't never look back and say I was a fundamentalist. My questions/doubts back then and my actions prove that I was never a fundamentalist.

    The best I can say is the New Atheist movement has the exact same amount of problem with the non-literal mythological theists as they do the fundamentalist especially since the atheist proposition goes against the non-literal theists just as well. The talking points against the non-literal theists just don't make for discussions to be media worthy.
     
  4. Munster

    Munster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2015
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I made bold a grammar correction. Sorry SpaceCricket79. I didn't hit the backspace key enough in my original response when I was editing the sentence.
     
  5. tkolter

    tkolter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2012
    Messages:
    7,134
    Likes Received:
    598
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Nope, since the modern followers believe in these books or use them for their faith either they are literal or fables, regardless of the text.
     
  6. it's just me

    it's just me Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2014
    Messages:
    3,269
    Likes Received:
    381
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Really? And how is it that you happen to know this?
     
  7. tkolter

    tkolter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2012
    Messages:
    7,134
    Likes Received:
    598
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Okay take the Torah, Jewish people who are religious don't use these books in their faith. Muslims don't use the Koran in Islam. Christians don't reference the gospels at all?

    If modern believes in a faith don't reference the books of the faith at all in some form either literally or as fables and moral tales your the one that needs to demonstrate that is common.
     

Share This Page