The Clinton's live in Chappaqua NY

Bill and Hillary Clinton live in Chappaqua NY Pop 1,436 (2010). The town is 75.5% White, 12.5% Asian, 7.8% Hispanic, 2.2% mixed race, 1.9% Black and 0.07% other. Hillary and Bill can live where ever they want, yet they choose to live in a town that's 1.9% Black (27). I am curious just how Hillary can identify with Black folks if she won't live in a very diverse community? Nationally Blacks make up 13.3% of the population where Hillary lives they make up 1.9%.



It appears to me she doesn't want them where she lives either.

http://www.city-data.com/city/Chappaqua-New-York.html

 

[video=youtube;ALXulk0T8cg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALXulk0T8cg[/video]

Bring them to heel?

 

That's why I've often felt that the problem with public housing was where it's located. If you want to provide poor minority kids the best education, locate public housing in the highest income zip codes and school zones in each metropolitan era. You can't have social justice until there is a block of public housing just down the street from Bill and Hillary.

It's not a coincidence that the most liberal places in the country push out African Americans. San Francisco and Austin TX are two examples that come to mind. We need to get the black populations back in those cities!

 

The Clintons are planning to move to public housing in Washington, DC.

In the 2010 US Census, the population distribution was 50.7% black, 38.5% white, 9.1% Hispanic (of any race), 4.4% other (including Native Americans, Alaskans, Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders), 3.5% Asian, and 1.6% mixed.


.

 

They are moving to a private home in the Kalorama area of Washington DC.

In Kalorama 86.39% of the population is Caucasian.
In Kalorama 4.04% of the population is African American.
In Kalorama 6.93% of the population is Asian.

 

As long as there isn't racial discrimination, no community can be indicted on that score by anyone with a racist agendum, although there are those who are likely to try it.

 

This should come as no surprise.After all we are talking the Supreme Queen of hipocrits

 

Likely to try it? Don't you mean ARE doing it?

Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice in the District of Columbia

Personally, I'm not comfortable with the President moving into a community that practices redlining, but I guess if you think it's OK...

 

2005?

Wow, you are desperate to contrive some sort of partisan indictment of the Obamas in 2017 and, the Clintons in 2021 or 2025 for an intent to settle in Kalorama.

They could, I suppose, try to score some sort of point by settling in Anacosta, but not everything has to be a token gesture about race.

 

The Clintons could burn a cross in their neighbor's front yard and they'd be fine with it. They are exactly -that- corrupt and oblivious due to generations of derangement by resentment/identity politics and union label propaganda.

 

Not a surprise. Wealthy progressives, the kind that chastise others on not embracing "diversity" enough, tend to live in very white areas, with prohibitively high housing values that keep out the "diversity" they love so much.

 

What do the Obamas and Clintons intent to reside in a hoiyu-toity DC neighborhood tell you?

 

The Clintons. You don't need a ******ned apostrophe when pluralising people's names.

 

It's disturbing how our politicians are now a class all their own, and that theirs is a very wealthy class.

Do people really think that this is democratic? It's oligarchic and plutocratic.

 

Goes along way to explain the crime rates, eh?

 

So to translate: Old news, time to move on.

I just get a kick at pointing out liberal hypocrisy on race and then watching them squirming, so thanks for cooperating!

- - - Updated - - -

That those who yap the most about diversity tend to avoid it at all costs.

 

He was referring to the White House, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.


Thanks to their friend and realtor.....Donald J Trump.

 

It is fun, but they just don't get it...

 

I love the way you guys "slip up"....and out yourselves for what you are.

 

If they did burn a cross in a yard, I suspect they would have plenty of left wing defenders to explain it away.

 

We live in the US, not Britain. Pluralize has a "z" not an "s". But your reply said it all.

 

Which is... what?
Oh! Wait! You're going to call me racist, knowing you cannot substantiate any such claim!

 

Unless you are referencing the correlation between street crime and urban poverty, there are those wee wee'd up by their ideological radio entertainers who believe that the Clintons returning to DC presages a crime wave, no doubt.

 

They'll be walking down the street without the Secret Service armed to the teeth then?

 

My spell check does it automatically.........do you have anything to add to the conversation?

BTW pluralising is spelled pluralizing.