Is Trump Making Gaffs? Or Being Brilliant?

Its a waste of time to try and understand Trump.. He's just not that bright .. Look what he has done to his family over the past six months AND thrown away his so-called presidential run.

 

First, I've already met your challenge. You apparently had never heard that your favored candidate wanted to amend the First Amendment via another constitutional amendment, and demanded a "source." Well I provided it, and now you either can not read that article, or any article, about the issue that you were clueless about and need to have it spoon fed to you. You wanted proof that Hillary wanted to amend the first amendment, and I gave it to you.

Secondly, you seem to think that you can hide the fact that I've exposed your ignorance about a major policy initiative by your candidate by keep making ridiculous demands on more explanations. No...you've already been exposed.

 

So, you're not going to use your own words like a grown up? Makes sense, considering who you are, lol. Embarrassing.

 

We are fussing bout some obscure details on EMAIL from 4 yr ago? WTF? I can't tell you much about whatever email I got or sent 4-5-6 yr ago. When Hillary became Sec-State.... there was no set POLICY ..and no real LAW on it. Powell and Rice had used ' private server." So what/ Ask me about an email from 5-6 yr ago... and FU... I doubt I could give you any accurate answer. I sure can not be accountable for Nigerian hustlers I probably can delete other spam ..and fac is NO email I did,got, is relevant or historic to anybody.

So it goes. So it goes. Few of us HONESTLY see " email technicalities" as a BFD. That's OLD NEWS.. while Trump trumpets craziness every week. Most Trumpsters can not EXPLAIN ANY part of how Mrs Clinton LIED, did enen a misdemeanor. .....Yet Trump has a HUUUUUUGE stack of Lies and maybe a pile of crimes and ALL on the record.

 

Really? What proven lies about the emails are you talking about?

 

No, just Citizens United, which is nothing more than corruption. She never said anything about amending the whole thing. Your question is disingenuous, as expected. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/416935/hillary-clinton-rewrite-first-amendment-joel-gehrke

 

If he wins, it's brilliance.

 

Not surprising that you wouldn't know what "words" are. However Hillary's constitutional amendment is off topic for this thread. I suggest you create one. I would love to read your thoughts on that.

 

Trump needs to stop soliciting campaign funds from foreigners. I thought he had already stopped doing that. Stupid.

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...oliciting-foreign-donations-complaint-alleges

 

I never said anything about the "whole thing."

Wow, you guys are really having trouble with words today.

 

Please be a man and provide your own words. You said Hillary Clinton wanted to amend the 1st amendment and equated it to Donald Trump wanting to eliminate freedom of the press. Now use your words, get one of your crayons out or something, and try to explain what you are talking about. What part of the 1st amendment does Hillary want to change?

 

Your quote from post# 12; she wanted a constitutional amendment to amend the First Amendment? That part to your sentence can only be interpreted as the whole amendment.

 

Why don't you submit a report to me on what exactly she wants to alter on the First Amendment? She's not may candidate. I don't want her to get the chance. It might be good for you since you hadn't even heard about it until today.

 

Those were your words. Be a man and let us know exactly what she has said that leads you to believe what you said. Otherwise you were just lying? Did you get confused or something?

 

I've no idea how you got that interpretation.

- - - Updated - - -

Since you are accusing me of lying, what specifically do you think I was lying about?

 

Off topic? So says the guy who went off topic to start with. Lol! You folks are a trip.

 

You said that she was trying to amend the 1st amendment. I'm asking you what part of it she wants to amend and you will not tell me. Just side tracking based on some article talking about Citizens United, lol. Either tell me what she is trying to change in the 1st amendment or admit you lied. There's no other alternative other than you simply not knowing what you're talking about and being confused.

- - - Updated - - -

They're absolutely embarrassing human beings. Trump is literally talking about making changes to the freedom of the press and this lil dude comes in and claims Hillary wanted to change the first amendment also and when called out on it is now saying it's off topic. It's absolutely hilarious. But it's what the right does. The most dishonest people out there.

 

My interpretation comes from the idea of maybe learning sixth grade reading comprehension? Just guessing?

 

See post #11. That's where it went off topic. That wasn't me.

 

This is what you asked:

And I provided it. I don't know why you think I owe you anything else. You've provided zero sources.

 

After you finish hammering him into submission, I'm guessing a few more posts, and you'll be telling him "bye bye Felicia".

 

And your source did not even mention the first amendment. It's talking about Citizens United. So I asked you to use your words to explain what your source is talking about in reference to your comment that she wants to amend the first amendment. You refuse to do so, which makes me believe you lied or are confused. Pick one.

 

Believe what you like. Even being accused of being a trump supporter is better than being accused of supporting Cankles.

 

That wasn't an off topic post. The poster sighted several examples how they related to Trump. The post was still about Trump. Sorry, try again!

 

This sounds like they were impeaching Bill for lying about having sex. Why do you guys think anyone who opposes Hillary is a Trump fan?

- - - Updated - - -

Lets not start that again. How about her claim she turned them all over when they just got a bunch again the other day for starts ?