Documentary attacking Hillary Clinton is US box office hit

Documentary attacking Hillary Clinton is US box office hit

Talking Movies' Tom Brook met the man behind the documentary, right-wing filmmaker and author Dinesh D'Souza
But endorsed by Donald Trump.

http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-36975018

Found in foreign press………….now tell us all this is proof of liberal bias in the media………

What else could it be?

 

It is a sloppy propaganda flic hyped up by right wing nutcase websites. Trump groupies and fringe nut case types Love it.. political porno that matches the bullcrap they already believed. FEW who were not Right wing Herd Animals even bothered (or paid) to see this crude mess..... but.... they made Money on a very low budget film.

 

So you saw the movie?

- - - Updated - - -

So one story in a foreign website is proof that American media isn't biased towards the left?

 

Of course..............aren't you reading the posts from the guys with the tin foil beanie's............... what else could it be.............

 

Why would you watch a propaganda film if that's what you thought it was? No, you watched it biting your nails trying to find out how deep the hole is. Didn't ya
Ask me if I watched it?

 

Coming from someone who most likely did not see the movie. LMFAO!

 

Lmao, these dudes make millions of dollars conning the conservative base. Anyone who supports them should be ashamed. Like watching Loose Change videos, lol.

 

Where did I ever say I watched it?.............I'm just the messenger, jeeeesss

 

The words you use say a lot about you, and very little about the people or things you use them on.

 

The movie should be number one!
Full of facts and timely.

 

It's simple. If you send 500 con men to congress because they told you how honorable they are- you listen to their words and don't require their actions to prove it, you get 500 crooks running the show. Anybody can say anything- words are hot air, but can be profitable. Actions on the other hand, reveal who people really are- but you have to dig, especially with politicians, already masters of deception. Of course, the worst of this group rise to the top. After all the Clinton's made over $10 million in 2015, on hot air alone. The head crook gets the best positions in this game, if we let them. IF.

Honor is the hallmark of quality leadership. Deception is hallmark of con artists. An election is not a court trial, and absolute proof is not required to say no to any candidate. One of the statements from congressional ethics states: "Not even the appearance of impropriety". Hillary has nothing but, and there a huge amount of verifiable information to back it up. Read Clinton Cash, the story of where the money is coming from, and the connections to political advantage.

I'm a long-term businessman and investor with world wide trade experience. I know how business works- and I assure you, big business does not pay $300 a second to hear anybody speak, without knowing how it will profit from it. Jesus couldn't command that kind of fee without the same motivation attached to the deal- but that is the price paid for one of Bill Clinton speeches; $750,000.00 for 40 minutes by a company who really needed some state department help... and got it soon after. Can't prove it's illegal, but the appearance of impropriety here smells like a truckload of dead fish on a hot day. It's also one of dozens of similar events. Clinton will take the selling of America to a new plateau.

When someone makes up their facts to tarnish a candidate, is just part of the game and it always happens. It is to be expected- but even when a story is total fabrication and you prove so, it DOES NOT erase or vindicate the actions of the candidate that are highly suspect and verifiable common practice. At least, not to a person who actually thinks and gives a damn about his county's future.

I certainly won't say Trump is a fine choice- but he is the first candidate in my memory that didn't sell himself out up front just to get on the ballot, and doesn't have loads of obligations that must be paid by selling out the job. Hillary does, and a lot of it. For example, from hedge funds- one of the most popular funnels for large influence deals also known as "contributions", the numbers tell you who's already sold out. Trump has collected about $19,000.00. Hillary has taken in $50 million. You don't really think that is just a gift of love from people who's sole purpose for living is to make money, do you?

I know it's a bit to swallow, but hold your nose and vote for Trump. The alternate choice is to vote for more of the same on a steadily increasing level of erosion of freedom, of more dishonesty, and more discontent at economic failures and and conditions breeding more violence. That road is becoming more dangerous all the time.

 

Bam. That's a bullseye.

His post was a slurry of angry buzzwords amounting to nothing short of "if it's not pro-Hillary it can't be true because Hillary is a perfect golden god".

 

How much did Hillary make from sales of her book? You know, the best seller "it takes a village". I bet she did pretty well selling that tripe to liberals. Should have been titled "it takes a village to raise a super-predator". Course only took Bill to put 'em behind bars.

 

Cause the liberal media won't cover it. Nuff said.

 

She's not selling some conspiracy theory. Just a normal book. I've never and don't care to ever read it. But silly comparison.

 

You didn't miss out, her campaign platform is based on it. Pandering to minorities about institutional racism, socio-economic inequities ... so the "vast right wing conspiracy" is the only one you're willing to advocate then?

 

Have you bothered to check?......

Try Google and see what you get.................then get back to us and admit you were wrong...................again!

 

Yeah, sounds like a right-wing version of Michael Moore..

 

if it's a "US box office hit" as the op claimed would you not assume almost everyone has seen it - LOL

.

 

Remember when D'Souza's "2016: Obama's America"....


was a "huge hit" and going to "help win it for Romney" in 2012???


All that happened.....D'Souza got rich off gullible and desperate Rightwingers.

 

The movie is mostly about the history of the Democratic Party in relation to slavery and segregation.

I highly recommend it.

 

Evidently you should give your own suggestion a try.

 

Distort de Newza.

 

I love the part that says Democrats fought to keep slaves, and ignores the part that all those Southern Slave holders now vote Republican.

You can't make this (*)(*)(*)(*) up!

- - - Updated - - -

You mean the Democrats before they all fled to the Republican party in the 1970s? Those democrats?

 

I've said for a while now that one thing Trump will walk away from this campaign with is a mailing list of proven suckers.