Report: Charlotte Protesters Tried to Throw Photographer Into a Fire <<MOD WARNING>>

My bologna has a first name, it's o-s-c-a-r...

That's what I think about your post.... Dork. Lolololol

 

Hey I like that post

 

For 4 years, 7 months, and 28 days.

 

Leave out the "probably" and you'll be closer to the truth.

 

Bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

 

Someone raining on your lib bashing fest, huh? You blame the left for EVERYTHING.

- - - Updated - - -

Can you elaborate on how our country was born of violence?

 

Was that a rebuttal?

When people are throwing objects, shooting fellow protestors in the head (which no one seems to care about), attacking reporters and looting stores....is that a "protest"?

When they're hunting white people to hurt in Milwaukee, is that also a "protest"?

You seem to agree with Yardmeat, so you should be able to give us some equivalent examples of "right wing" violence.

 

sounds like gangsters rather than protestors

 

I've NEVER seen you chastise a tightie rightie.. What does that make you? Hypo... Something.

 

Quit lying and making (*)(*)(*)(*) up so you will feel better. And ffs, stop putting words in McFranklins fingers.

 

Same for you. Produce a post of yours where you belittle a pub.... And doesn't talk (*)(*)(*)(*) about liberals like we are invisible on the thread.

Good luck.

 

Biggest bologna sandwich to today.

- - - Updated - - -

That's (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, he is.

 

Bahahaaaaahhhaaaa! Niiiiicely done!

 

Oh FFS. I've watched tightie righties denigrate libs for very long time. You can stop whining now.

 

I may be choosing the words...they are choosing their actions. The truth is in front of you...look and see for yourself.

 

See you know nothing about me. I'm not whining...I'm smiling. Nice try though.

 

http://prospect.org/article/republican-rhetoric-and-right-wing-terrorism-10-troubling-incidents
April 2009: Richard Poplawski kills three Pittsburgh police officers. Friends told the press that Poplawski, who posted to white supremacist web sites, was worried that Obama was coming to take everyone's guns away.
April 2009: Joshua Cartwright, a U.S. Army reservist, kills two police officers at a gun range. His wife tells the police he was "severely disturbed" that Barack Obama had been elected president and believed the government was conspiring against him.
May 2009: Scott Roeder, an anti-abortion activist, guns down Dr. George Tiller at Tiller's church.
June 2009: White supremacist James Wenneker von Brunn kills a security guard at the Holocaust Museum in Washington.
February 2010: Joseph Stack flies a small plane into an IRS office in Austin, TX, killing himself and one IRS official and injuring many others. Stack left behind a manifesto complaining about the tax agency. Rep. Steve King (R-IA) responds by saying, "It's sad the incident in Texas happened, but by the same token, it's an agency that is unnecessary and when the day comes when that is over and we abolish the IRS, it's going to be a happy day for America."
October 2011: Holly Ann Grigsby and Joey Pedersen, two white supremacists, go on a multi-state crime spree that begins with killing Pedersen's parents, then adds murders of a middle-aged black man and a young man they thought looked Jewish.
December 2011: Members of a Georgia anti-government militia group called FEAR (Forever Enduring Always Ready) kill two of their compatriots, and are found to be preparing a campaign of bombings and assassinations.
August 2012: Wade Michael Page, a white supremacist, kills 6 people at a Sikh temple in Oak Creek, WI.
August 2012: a group of people associated with the "sovereign citizens" movement kills two police officers and injures two more in St. John, LA.
April 2014: Frazier Glenn Cross kills three people at a Jewish community center and Jewish retirement home.
And that doesn't even count the many plots for murder and mayhem that authorities have stopped (many of which are detailed here). But as Radley Balko suggested, maybe this just isn't that big a problem:



Balko is starting after the Oklahoma City Bombing, which is fine. It's true that in terms of things you should be worried out affecting you personally, right-wing terrorism ranks pretty low. But that isn't really the question. If you could wind back the clock and replay the last five years, but this time with conservatives expressing their disagreement with Barack Obama and their concerns about the size of government in saner terms, would any of these incidents be averted?

- - - Updated - - -

Good to hear..... However, it is still a fact that you righties constantly belittle liberals everyday.

 

Civilization is based in a collective recognition of rights.

Obviously, the protestors/rioters have lost their desire, perhaps even ability to recognize the rights of those documenting their protest or riot.

Riot is what happens if protests are not heeded.

Protest are what happens if freedom of speech does not serve the purpose of creating the unity needed to protect unalienable rights.

Civilization is based in our collective ability to recognize the logic of the above.

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

 

Everyone seems to forget those two last points, even though our government has made any attempt at changing/abolishing the current form of government "treason". They've entrenched themselves and tried to make it impossible legally to raise against them.

From Obama's "tax", to Bush's illegal wars, to Clinton, Bush I's continuation of Reagan's vastly ramped up war on drugs, they have acted against our interest for decades. Then they make it illegal to change.

 

We are millions, but have very limited access to one another in the direct social sense. Imagine if the usenet had not been taken from us and given to dot com in 1994.




In the large picture our constitution gives the people the right to alter or abolish.



Obviously, I mean IF we agree, upon the most prime constitutional intents, and rights to manifest them.

Do you agree and accept that the framers of the founding documents intended for us to alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Do you agree and accept that the ultimate purpose of free speech is to enable the unity adequate to effectively alter or abolish government destructive to our unalienable rights?

Government can be formed that has mechanisms which alter or abolishes itself, with our democratic direction, from the intent of the framing documents as holding the principles of the republic. Article V is such a mechanism.

All amendments must have constitutional intent.

Who decides?

Read the 9th amendment.

 

How does a thug rat getting smoked justify a riot? Hell most commutes with a half a brain would have said good riddance.