He's always been Satan, it just never mattered because he was in the private sector and there wasn't much a person could or needed to do if they weren't somebody that had interactions with him. My opinion of Trump did not change once he ran for president, only the urgency of it. It was never important before, about as meaningful and important as an opinion on a movie star or music artist. It's an entirely different ballgame once you run to be president OF EVERYONE. And there you go again, bringing up Clinton's corruption while excusing Donald Trump and all his legal and ethical problems. You don't have the moral high ground here, because essentially you're suggesting we replace public servant Clinton with private sector Clinton. Oh but wait, "he's nowhere near as close to as corrupt". So now there are varying degrees of corruption and you have decided that some corruption(Trump) is okay while other corruption(Clinton) is not. Yes, you definitely represent the way to get America great again. I can see the campaign slogan now. Donald Trump Now with 12% less corruption than leading competitors! - margin of error -12%
Can you name any of the new talent coming up to replace these establishment candidates for the next round. Is there another loudmouthed billionaire waiting in the wings to attack the establishment in case your hero gets beat next week? Any ideas?
One GOPe RINO votes for another GOPe RINO instead of the GOP nominee and you make a wild ass assertion that there is no unity in the GOP. LMFAO! Oh BTW, Paul Ryan just announced he already voted for Trump in early voting. I would love to see your face the night of the election when Trump wins.
No man, you don't "got it." I'm anti-establishment like Trump. Kasich, "along with others" are pro-establishment.
Trump appears to be a Commnist agent who has been groomed by the Ruskies for at least 5 years. They have ruthlessly attacked the DNC and the Clinton campaign for the last 6 months in hopes of having a greedy sellout Commie as President of the US. Stalin, Lenin and Kruchev are dancing in their graves. As far as Clinton goes, if she loses, it is all her fault for being such an easy target. She should have gotten rid of Huma as soon as her creep of a husband 'revealed' himself the first time. This election is a lot like a Mel Brooks movie. Admitted P-ssy grabber against disgusting weenie wagger.....Frankly, I could give a rat's ass which one of these ********s wins.
If you really want to know the truth about Communists, look no further than the 45 communist goals: http://www.rense.com/general32/americ.htm All 45 of those goals have been met now, and America has been overtaken by commies. - - - Updated - - - I think Hillary may have as well.
And we find it funny how you can't keep up with reality and still run around not being in the knowing. Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia ..... For much of the summer, the F.B.I. pursued a widening investigation into a Russian role in the American presidential campaign. Agents scrutinized advisers close to Donald J. Trump, looked for financial connections with Russian financial figures, searched for those involved in hacking the computers of Democrats, and even chased a lead which they ultimately came to doubt about a possible secret channel of email communication from the Trump Organization to a Russian bank. Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html?_r=2
Look whos talking.....the Demo bench don't have anyone after Hillary. Maybe 12 years down the line you might have a viable candidate. Which that's a maybe.
There's something to be said about voting one's conscience. In this particular instance, I'm not exactly what that is, but the act itself, would more follow suit, I guarantee would be more likely see the change both (R)'s & (D)'s say they want, and the country so desperately needs. To continue this partisan path, expecting anything other than what becomes reality day 1 ... Ok , maybe day 7 after the election, is the definition of insanity.
Well, at least Kasich, and McCain are consistent goy puppets of AIPAC; consistent imbeciles. In a way, I feel sorry for the delusional mindless left. Despite AIPAC'S almost total control of Congress, the White House, the Military, the press, education and most government institutions ; despite AIPAC's top Zionist in Europe meddling in the voting process with attempts at vote fraud; George Soros, they have been unable to stop Trump. The fact remains; the American people are waking up to AIPAC, and Bolshevik/Global Zionism. Next week the American people will have a new President; not connected to AIPAC, not connected to Globalist/ Zionism, not connected to corrupt Treasonous behavior. The only thing he will be connected to is the restoration of America, and it's people, and that man is Donald Trump. The delusional leftist masses can either climb aboard or get left behind.
So in other words, you got no one...I thought so.....By the way, answering a question with a question is known as the Pee Wee Herman technique. I hope that the Dems will have some young idealistic Bernie Supporter ready to go in 8 years. If Hillary wins and can end the stranglehold the corporate fascists have had on the US Supreme Court since the Rehnquist days and hopefully has ended with the death of Scalia, we might be able to break the spell the global elites have had over us for decades. - - - Updated - - - You think Trump can get those Jews in line, do you....
Oh we have someone.....he just isn't a billionaire. And he will run if Hillary wins. So she wont have 2 terms. So don't let Rubio fool you besides Cruz saying he will run. Now as to your Demo bench.....you will have no one with any Star Power or nationwide popularity. At least keep up with that reality. Oh and note I didn't ask you any question. So don't start seeing things not there, like you are already starting to do.
You keep forgetting that me and my buddies forced the Republicans to nominate Trump, they didn't do it willingly. It's no surprise when they act out. It might come back to haunt him.
Cruz has about as much chance of being elected POTUS as Anthony Weiner. He is the only guy in the country who is more hated than either Clinton or Trump and he is a raving bible thumping lunatic. Rubio might be able to get the nomination in 2020 and if things are not going well he could win. But he is far from being anti-establishment. He is a neoCON and has always been in favor of all these trade deals that Trump is railing against right now. If Hillary gets a break and the economy catches fire like it did under Willy, you guys will have to wait till '24.
No Rubio isn't a Neo Con and he broke ranks when he went with DeMint and the Tea party. Hence Bush and the Neos tanking his run. Rubio showed that when he went against the Import/Export bank and spoke up about that Crony Capitalism.
Give it a break.....Kasich just wants a job back with Lehman bros and he knows Hillary will put in a good word for him.
Considering Trumps off-spring marriages to Wall-Street Zionists "in line" seems unlikely; however, "controlled to a degree" seems more probable; it will depend on how serious he is about restoring America, and stopping its destruction. Personally, I will settle for half of what Trump promised. To get beyond that would require Martial Law, the arrest of Congress, a temporary shut-down of the Government; in short, a "closed for remodeling" sign would have to put up at the borders. Things would be pretty ugly for a couple of years; although admittedly there is a big difference between what I want and what Trump does. If the country gets half of what he promised I'm prepared to call it good.
Let's see what he proposes when his time comes. I have nothing against the guy except that he was always sucking up to the Bush's in his early days.
Sure there is. But there is also disunity and the RAT's (Republicans Against Trump) and the RAT's who are RAT's even though they pledged to support the nominee. Because Kasich broke his pledge, I don't support this action, normally going with your conscience, even at the expense of the Party is something quite common in the GOP. But not with the Democrats. Has a single Democrat condemned Dirty Donna Braziles actions? Politico noted that a reporter actually asked Josh Earnest if the President thought Brazile should step aside. He responded by saying that Barack Obama believes she has done a fine job and that, she is a person of integrity and she is a person of high character. As for Hillary Clinton herself, I cant find a single instance where shes commented on the debate rigging scheme nor even been asked the question. Have any Democrats condemned Braziles actions? If not, we are left to assume that all of their bluster about Trumps comments were nonsense and they dont really have a problem with election rigging after all. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/white-house-support-donna-brazile-230546 The Fourth Estate is charged with informing the public and guiding them through the election, in part through the conduct and coverage of debates in both the primary and the general election. Donna Brazile put her thumb on the scale, assisted by members of the media who fed her the questions from time to time without bothering to wonder if she would use that information to cheat. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/5205 Dirty Donna, Chair of DNC, Recently fired from CNN for Cheating