Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

DennisTate · Nov 2, 2016

No wonder she wanted to use a private server to send e-mails?

She is a bright girl....... she knew that officials who got to the place where they had
high security clearance levels...... might not approve of or agree with some important deals
that she was involved in.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clintons wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Click to expand...

No wonder so many of Comey's buddies in the FBI were really disappointed a few months ago when he seemed to
be letting her off the hook.

DennisTate · Nov 2, 2016

This helps to explain why so many of Mr. Comey's colleagues put pressure on him.

http://www.politicalforum.com/lates...internal-feud-over-hillary-clinton-probe.html

FBI in Internal Feud Over Hillary Clinton Probe
.....
(post #6).....

longknife said: ↑

Comey Reopened Investigation due to Mutinous Agents

It's been clear for some time that FBI agents were furious about the move not to indict Shrillary. And discovering the payoff to the lead investigator only made it worse. So, if he wanted to keep the agency intact, he had no other choice but to ignore Lynch and go ahead. I'll bet he announced it more to please his agents than to affect the election.

Some people, including department heads, stopped talking to Jim, and even ignored his greetings when they passed him in the hall,' said the source. 'They felt that he betrayed them and brought disgrace on the bureau by letting Hillary off with a slap on the wrist.'

According to the source, Comey fretted over the problem for months and discussed it at great length with his wife, Patrice.

He told his wife that he was depressed by the stack of resignation letters piling up on his desk from disaffected agents. The letters reminded him every day that morale in the FBI had hit rock bottom.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...open-Hillary-investigation.html#ixzz4ObsFIiLF
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Nov 2, 2016

Horhey has began another discussion that backs up
and to some degree explains the theme in this other article.

http://www.politicalforum.com/lates...bshell-exposes-extent-clinton-corruption.html

Wikileaks BOMBSHELL Exposes Extent Of Clinton Corruption

Horhey said: ↑

The Clinton Foundation was used as a for-profit "pay to play" front for corporate "access" to then "Madame Secretary" Killary in 2011.

May we descend into low level comedy:

Published on Nov 1, 2016

Wikileaks reveals emails that show the depth of the corruption at the Clinton Foundation. Cenk Uygur, host of The Young Turks, breaks it down. Tell us what you think in the comment section below. https://www.tytnetwork.com/join

“When top Bill Clinton aide Douglas Band wrote the memo, he was a central player at the Clinton Foundation and president of his own corporate consulting firm. Over the course of 13 pages, he made a case that his multiple roles had served the interests of the Clinton family and its charity.

In doing so, Band also detailed a circle of enrichment in which he raised money for the Clinton Foundation from top-tier corporations such as Dow Chemical and Coca-Cola that were clients of his firm, Teneo, while pressing many of those same donors to provide personal income to the former president.

The system has drawn scrutiny from Republicans, who say it allowed corporations and other wealthy supporters to pay for entree to a popular former president and a onetime secretary of state who is now the Democratic presidential nominee.

Band wrote the memo in 2011 to foundation lawyers conducting a review of the organization amid a brewing feud with the Clintons’ daughter, Chelsea Clinton, who was taking a stronger role in leading the foundation and had expressed concerns about Teneo’s operations.”

Read more here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...f84bba-9b92-11e6-b3c9-f662adaa0048_story.html
Click to expand...

The obvious question posed by The Intercept:

I would add that it shouldn't take a jaded disposition to doubt that a Clinton-run charity is about charitable work in the first place.
Click to expand...

Margot2 · Nov 2, 2016

You really should make some effort to get the details.

DennisTate · Nov 2, 2016

Very interesting indeed!

https://theintercept.com/2016/08/25...es-donate-millions-to-the-clinton-foundation/

Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?

Glenn Greenwald

That the Clinton Foundation has done some good work is beyond dispute. But that fact has exactly nothing to do with the profound ethical problems and corruption threats raised by the way its funds have been raised. Hillary Clinton was America’s chief diplomat, and tyrannical regimes such as the Saudis and Qataris jointly donated tens of millions of dollars to an organization run by her family and operated in its name, one whose works has been a prominent feature of her public persona. That extremely valuable opportunity to curry favor with the Clintons, and to secure access to them, continues as she runs for president.

The claim that this is all just about trying to help people in need should not even pass a laugh test, let alone rational scrutiny. To see how true that is, just look at who some of the biggest donors are. Although it did not give while she was secretary of state, the Saudi regime by itself has donated between $10 million and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation, with donations coming as late as 2014, as she prepared her presidential run. A group called “Friends of Saudi Arabia,” co-founded “by a Saudi Prince,” gave an additional amount between $1 million and $5 million. The Clinton Foundation says that between $1 million and $5 million was also donated by “the State of Qatar,” the United Arab Emirates, and the government of Brunei. “The State of Kuwait” has donated between $5 million and $10 million.

Theoretically, one could say that these regimes — among the most repressive and regressive in the world — are donating because they deeply believe in the charitable work of the Clinton Foundation and want to help those in need. Is there a single person on the planet who actually believes this? Is Clinton loyalty really so strong that people are going to argue with a straight face that the reason the Saudi, Qatari, Kuwaiti and Emirates regimes donated large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation is because those regimes simply want to help the foundation achieve its magnanimous goals?
Click to expand...

It is worthwhile to click on this link.....

because one of the goals of the Clinton Foundation is to assist girls and women....

and a link is given to an article where a top Saudi Cleric argues that the ban on women driving cars.....
should continue.... so that they not be exposed to temptation!

Good point! The Saudi millionaires and billionaires don't seem to be all that interested in assisting girls and women!

DennisTate · Nov 2, 2016

Margot2 said: ↑

You really should make some effort to get the details.
Click to expand...

You are correct Margot2... the more I read about this the more interesting it gets.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...f84bba-9b92-11e6-b3c9-f662adaa0048_story.html

Inside ‘Bill Clinton Inc.’: Hacked memo reveals intersection of charity and personal income

Band’s memo provided data showing how much money each of Teneo’s 20 clients at the time had given to the Clinton Foundation, how much they had paid Bill Clinton and, in some cases, how he or Kelly had personally forged the relationships that resulted in the payments.

Band wrote that Teneo partners had raised in excess of $8 million for the foundation and $3 million in paid speaking fees for Bill Clinton. He said he had secured contracts for the former president that would pay out $66 million over the subsequent nine years if the deals remained in place.
Click to expand...

.....

Another achievement cited by Band: Laureate International Universities, a chain of for-profit international colleges, which donated to the foundation and agreed to pay Bill Clinton $3.5 million a year to serve as honorary chancellor.
Click to expand...

vonsigler · Nov 2, 2016

And they used the Uranium to make multiple Satan-2 nukes.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Margot2 · Nov 2, 2016

DennisTate said: ↑

Very interesting indeed!

https://theintercept.com/2016/08/25...es-donate-millions-to-the-clinton-foundation/

Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?

Glenn Greenwald

It is worthwhile to click on this link.....

because one of the goals of the Clinton Foundation is to assist girls and women....

and a link is given to an article where a top Saudi Cleric argues that the ban on women driving cars.....
should continue.... so that they not be exposed to temptation!

Good point! The Saudi millionaires and billionaires don't seem to be all that interested in assisting girls and women!
Click to expand...

67% of university students are women and women get more business licenses than men.

DennisTate · Nov 3, 2016

Margot2 said: ↑

67% of university students are women and women get more business licenses than men.
Click to expand...

OK.... that certainly is good news!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_rights_in_Saudi_Arabia

Women's rights in Saudi Arabia are limited in comparison to many of its neighbors. The World Economic Forum 2015 Global Gender Gap Report ranked Saudi Arabia 134th out of 145 countries for gender parity.[6] All women, regardless of age, are required to have a male guardian. Saudi Arabia is the only country in the world that prohibits women from driving. Saudi women constitute 13% of the country's native workforce as of 2015.[2][3]

However, women's status has changed in recent decades. Women were previously forbidden from voting or being elected to political office, but in 2011 King Abdullah declared that women would be able to vote and run in the 2015 local elections, as well as be appointed to the Consultative Assembly.[7] More university graduates in Saudi Arabia are Saudi women than men,[8] and female literacy is estimated to be 91% (though lower than male literacy) far higher than just 40 years ago. The average age at first marriage among Saudi females in the kingdom is 25 years.[9][10][11]

Many conservative Saudi women do not support loosening traditional gender roles and restrictions, on the grounds that Saudi Arabia is the closest thing to an "ideal and pure Islamic nation," and under threat from "imported Western values".[12]

Among the factors that define rights for women in Saudi are government laws, the Hanbali and Wahhabi interpretation of Sunni Islam, and traditional customs of the Arabian peninsula.[
Click to expand...

DennisTate · Nov 4, 2016

Margot2 said: ↑

You really should make some effort to get the details.
Click to expand...

How about this?

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...ctment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

BRET BAIER: Breaking news tonight -- two separate sources with intimate knowledge of the FBI investigations into the Clinton emails and the Clinton Foundation tell Fox the following:

The investigation looking into possible pay-for-play interaction between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Foundation has been going on for more than a year. Led by the white collar crime division, public corruption branch of the criminal investigative division of the FBI.

The Clinton Foundation investigation is a, quote, "very high priority." Agents have interviewed and reinterviewed multiple people about the Foundation case, and even before the WikiLeaks dumps, agents say they have collected a great deal of evidence. Pressed on that, one sources said, quote, "a lot of it," and "there is an avalanche of new information coming every day."

Some of it from WikiLeaks, some of it from new emails. The agents are actively and aggressively pursuing this case. They will be going back to interview the same people again, some for the third time.

As a result of the limited immunity deals to top aides, including Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, the Justice Department had tentatively agreed that the FBI would destroy those laptops after a narrow review. We are told definitively that has not happened. Those devices are currently in the FBI field office here in Washington, D.C. and are being exploited.

The source points out that any immunity deal is null and void if any subject lied at any point in the investigation.

Meantime, the classified e-mail investigation is being run by the National Security division of the FBI. They are currently combing through former Democratic Congressman Anthony Wiener's laptop and have found e-mails that they believe came from Hillary Clinton's server that appear to be new, as in not duplicates.

Whether they contain classified material or not is not yet known. It will likely be known soon. All of this just as we move inside one week until election day.

Baier gives more details to Fox News Channel's Brit Hume.

Transcript:
Click to expand...

BRET BAIER: Here's the deal: We talked to two separate sources with intimate knowledge of the FBI investigations. One: The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far... Several offices separately have been doing their own investigations.

Two: The immunity deal that Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson, two top aides to Hillary Clinton, got from the Justice Department in which it was beleived that the laptops they had, after a narrow review for classified materials, were going to be destroyed. We have been told that those have not been destroyed -- they are at the FBI field office here on Washington and are being exploited. .

Three: The Clinton Foundation investigation is so expansive, they have interviewed and re-interviewed many people. They described the evidence they have as 'a lot of it' and said there is an 'avalanche coming in every day.' WikiLeaks and the new emails.

They are "actively and aggressively pursuing this case." Remember the Foundation case is about accusations of pay-for-play... They are taking the new information and some of them are going back to interview people for the third time. As opposed to what has been written about the Clinton Foundation investigation, it is expansive.

The classified e-mail investigation is being run by the National Security division of the FBI. They are currently combing through Anthony Weiner's laptop. They are having some success -- finding what they believe to be new emaisls, not duplicates, that have been transported through Hillary Clinton's server.

Finally, we learned there is a confidence from these sources that her server had been hacked. And that it was a 99% accuracy that it had been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that things had been taken from that...

There has been some angst about Attorney General Loretta Lynch -- what she has done or not done. She obviously did not impanel, or go to a grand jury at the beginning. They also have a problem, these sources do, with what President Obama said today and back in October of 2015...

I pressed again and again on this very issue... The investigations will continue, there is a lot of evidence. And barring some obstruction in some way, they believe they will continue to likely an indictment.
Click to expand...

PoliticsPolicyMarketsWorldDefenseEnergyHealthScienceReligionFutureEducationSportsHistoryBooksLife
© 2015 RealClearPolitics.com. All Rights Reserved.About UsPrivacy PolicyAdvertise With UsContactRSS

Merwen · Nov 7, 2016

DennisTate said: ↑

No wonder she wanted to use a private server to send e-mails?

She is a bright girl....... she knew that officials who got to the place where they had
high security clearance levels...... might not approve of or agree with some important deals
that she was involved in.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

No wonder so many of Comey's buddies in the FBI were really disappointed a few months ago when he seemed to
be letting her off the hook.
Click to expand...

How people can ignore this is beyond me.

Log in or Sign up

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Margot2 Banned

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

vonsigler Member

Margot2 Banned

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Merwen Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Margot2 Banned

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

vonsigler Member

Margot2 Banned

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

DennisTate Well-Known Member Past Donor

Merwen Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches