Clinton could have received 800,000 votes from noncitizens

Oops, is the popular vote for lying Hillary evaporating? Yes it is, and I have been saying this for years. There is absolutely no way to keep an illegal from voting in states like California, because no one will ever ask if you are a legal resident. Anyone can vote in California using their drivers license, and California just last year issued almost one million to illegals. Time to make voting for US citizens only, not the entire world who choose to be here illegally.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/26/hillary-clinton-received-800000-votes-from-nonciti/


Political scientist Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, has worked with colleagues to produce groundbreaking research on noncitizen voting, and this week he posted a blog in response to Mr. Trump’s assertion.
Based on national polling by a consortium of universities, a report by Mr. Richman said 6.4 percent of the estimated 20 million adult noncitizens in the U.S. voted in November. He extrapolated that that percentage would have added 834,381 net votes for Mrs. Clinton, who received about 2.8 million more votes than Mr. Trump.
Mr. Richman calculated that Mrs. Clinton would have collected 81 percent of noncitizen votes.

 

Trump, and many of us, will be vindicated. Non-citizens do vote, and the Democratic Party not only encourages them, but shows them how. Wait for it.

 

That study is from 2008. You know, EIGHT years before the 2016 election?

To unequivocally claim that "study finds that Clinton received 800,000 votes from non-citizens is ridiculous on many levels.

 

Oh yea?

So the number is a hell of a lot more than 800k then.

A bunch of people reached voting age during those eight years, not to mention how many more millions invaded during the period.

 

Lofl. Big deal. Still over 2.5 million more voted for the crooked Hillary.

Look, I know it's hard to accept being bottom of the barrel, but at least you're the bottom of the barrel that coincidentally also houses Clinton and Soros and Gruber and sordid other scumbag criminals.

Trumps ego is making this a thing.

He lost the popular vote. Instead of hinging on the fact his team ran a brilliant and targeted campaign that will modify politics forever, they are freaking out that he didn't win the popular vote.

Big. Deal. He won. GET OVER IT, and congratulate his team on running a targeted, stellar campaign.

 

There is no one that questions the legality of citizenship to prevent them from voting, so being an ostrich with your head in the sand doesn't address the needed investigation. But of course, you being a liberal would not want this substantial voter based denied to your liberal religion

 

So I see you couldn't care less if our elections are skewed by illegal voters. Trump will put forth the needed investigation and there is nothing but the left will do, which is scream racism. Pathetic

- - - Updated - - -

The liberal base will be evaporating under president Trump

 

Where's the methodology? Where's the evidence?

 

What's pathetic is your fake news BS on this point.

 

No, it's called using math to extrapolate a corresponding number of votes from the 2016 election based on research from 2008.

 

You left the word could out of your title. I could have shot OBL.
Also it's a blog. It's fake, worthlessness. But nice try.

 

There are absolutely people who question the legality of citizenship to prevent them from voting. That's what happens at voter registration. Proof of birth in US or permanent residency through supporting documents is required.

I deleted the rest of your post because it was worthless and didn't deserve the effort of a reply.

- - - Updated - - -

There are absolutely people who question the legality of citizenship to prevent them from voting. That's what happens at voter registration. Proof of birth in US or permanent residency through supporting documents is required.

I deleted the rest of your post because it was worthless and didn't deserve the effort of a reply.

 

Ah. IC. So point to the part in the "study" that indicates that everyone who check "noncitizen" that voted actually voted for Hillary Clinton.

I'll wait while you gather the information for your reply.

 

Read the story - this claim is not made.

 

I don't need to gather any information. You know, I know, and the DNC knows they are corrupt and engaged in every kind of fraud imaginable.

We've seen the Wikileaks information, we know the lows that the DNC slinks to.

We know that the Democrat party fights to prevent any examination into voter fraud, as well as the ridiculous claims they make when voter ID laws are suggested.

All I have to do is wait for the proof, because we all know it's happening.

 

Yeah its probably a much higher number by now

 

Man IS the main cause of climate change!!! The only evidence is that temperature has risen since the industrial revolution. It's changed equally drastically when man wasn't around but THIS TIME it's all mans fault?

By the way there is no evidence or proof of exactly how much man has influenced climate besides the recent spike. We'll just have to take their word for it and spend trillions fixing something that very possibly can't be fixed. But who cares. Again, there have been other spikes but THIS TIME it has to be man, because hey, scientists have to eat too😜 and there's no money in saying otherwise. No one will give you money to prove man isn't having as big an impact as others claim.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

'Extrapolate'? You mean 'assume', based on a mathematical projection. Means little, proves nothing but indicates a possible outcome-IF projections based on possible future unknown results are accurate. Possible, not definitive-and there's a huge chasm between the two.

 

Yeah well.... dude... I mean.
A foreigner who legally is residing in California is also able to get a diverse license.
The DMV over there even will take the test in Turkish or Hmong.

Seems just far fetched to claim they all can vote for the US president.


Probably the worst thing about this one is. There is a theory, but no evidence.

 

That is not true. You check a box claiming you are a citizen. There is no check for citizen status to register. My state attempted to make that a requirement and was it was shot down via the courts last year.

 

It appears that you're arguing just for the sake of arguing. You're really not interested in fixing the U.S voting system in some states where almost anyone can vote regardless of their status. A joke. Just obtain a driving licence and that's it. Millions of non-citizens have drivining licences, most of them in California followed by New York and Michigan. A fact.

The fraud is real. And it's almost always committed by Democrats. Another fact you persistently refuse to digest.

Judge Napolitano: Election Fraud in Detroit Looks 'Organized, and Government Involved'

https://pjmedia.com/election/2016/1...roit-looks-organized-and-government-involved/

...Host Stuart Varney described the type of"human error" that caused the discrepancies. "The poll worker takes the ballot, and puts it into a scanning machine, and says, 'oh good gosh, it jammed.'" The poll worker then proceeds to rescan the ballot "again, and again, and again."

"That is a different kind of fraud," Napolitano said. "Because that is the government defrauding itself. "The poll worker is an employee of, or a volunteer in behalf of the government. You're talking about a crime now. ... The law guarantees fair elections -- not perfect ones. If this had changed the outcome, it would be unfair and it would warrant a serious inquiry."

"But it happened in 248 precincts!" Varney exclaimed. "More votes were cast than voters!"

Watch the video on the next page...

 

President Trump is correct once again...

 

Just letting you know, this is not a new thing. There have been 2 studies on this study rebuking the results based on the notion that people PROBABLY clicked the wrong box online, and another peer reviewed rebuke indicating those who produced this study had bias. I mention this only because once the usual suspects realize this they will flood in here claiming that this has been "debunked". Of course those "debunking" are highly pedigreed leftists. This is not a smoking gun, because the mechanisms necessary to find that are obfuscated openly by the democrats. It will take a serious investigation from hostile forces to ever validate the truth to America.

 

So illegals stopped voted 8 years latter?

 

If you don't think illegals vote or there is no voter fraud, you are very obtuse.