For the good of the country, Sessions should resign

No, I'm simply pointing out when Eric Holder broke the law, he didn't resign, so I don't see why, when Sessions has broken no law, he should resign

 

Collusion? I doubt you can make that case, nor could you ever prove it. Which of course is the point of this pointless exercise. There is no ability to either produce or advance a legal case, so in its absence, you're willing to smear folks in the media using the media as the brush to do so. It's pretty simple.

You're making an uninformed assertion of misconduct based on unsubstantiated assertions that hint at it. I suppose the real danger is that folks like you are so distraught over your unfulfilled expectations of your queen being coronated that you satisfy yourself with these baseless accusations and transfer your disappointment into them.

 

Your leaving out there is no proof of any collusion

http://www.dailystormer.com/james-g...lluded-with-russia-but-he-believes-it-anyway/

 

Lynch should have resigned over meeting with Bill Clinton in a private meeting while Hillary and the Clinton Foundation were both under investigation.

 

I get you, but does it really matter whom Trump picks. As a Trump nominee for whatever agency or cabinet post, it is the job of those who head the agencies or posts to do Trump's will. Whether it is Sessions or someone else, it will be either Sessions or that someone else to do exactly what Trump wants. This is one reason I have always said that any president should have the people he wants in whatever position he wants them in. If they mess up, it is the president's responsibility and the president should take all the blame.

 

...why would Jeff Sessions meet with Russians,unless he was doing so on the behalf of the USA...he was a Senator at the time?....this topic has no meaning at all, except to smear Jeff Sessions.....this would never happen if Jeff was a Democrat...8 years of Obama has caused hysteria of the 3rd kind!

 

love this new forum page...

 

This goes back to just what I said or asked, does it really matter whom Trump picks or any president picks? It is the job of whomever is picked to do exactly what Trump wants in that position. Sessions, Joe Blow, whomever. I am sure Sessions will run the DOJ like Trump wants him too and if not Sessions, whomever would replace would do the same thing.

In the end it is the president who is responsible, credit or blame the way the DOJ or any post or agency is run. The president appointed them and as such has final responsibility, good or bad.