The Unmasking

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Foolardi, Apr 4, 2017.

  1. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you actually think the FBI should play politics.

    Well congrats. They did
     
  2. therooster

    therooster Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2014
    Messages:
    13,004
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No I don't think they did . I think they should if they see Unamerican scumbags spying on the incoming president and his team.
     
  3. Belch

    Belch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2015
    Messages:
    16,275
    Likes Received:
    4,479
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course it's all about the team.

    I'm glad that we can both agree on that. So don't complain if your team is on the ropes and the ref isn't looking while my guy hits below the belt. You can complain, but you're not going to find much sympathy here when my guy got the same punch in the last round.

    It's war, and you'll be lucky if Trump doesn't come up with a few ways to cheat that Obama never even considered.
     
  4. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    God, that's pathetic.
     
  5. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Under the Espionage act what Susan Rice did was
    considered a Conspiracy.That puts her in a world of trouble.
    She Started the ball rolling by demanding the Unmasking.This never
    would have taken place w/o her.SHE INITIATED IT.
    Therefore who put her up to it.
    She is solely responsible for any unmasking.She may well have
    called for Flynn to be unmasked and leaked it.
     
  6. Belch

    Belch Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2015
    Messages:
    16,275
    Likes Received:
    4,479
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course it's pathetic! We should have been able to debate issues, rather than blindly side with our team. That didn't happen, so I feel forced into this.

    I'm not going to debate morality with the immoral.

    Here is a great example of what I'm talking about.


    She refused to answer the simplest question ever given to anybody.
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2017
  7. katzgar

    katzgar Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You aren't making sense again
     
  8. katzgar

    katzgar Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope not true
     
  9. katzgar

    katzgar Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    9,361
    Likes Received:
    1,033
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nobody spied on the incoming American president you're making stuff up
     
  10. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then why were the names unmasked?
     
  11. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Pure BS. They have a job to do and getting involved in politics is not part of it. If they find corruption they gather evidence and refer for prosecution.

    That's NOT what you advocated
     
  12. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Conversations were recorded between foreign agents. Legally.

    American names mentioned in those conversation were "masked" . It is completely normal when a National Security Advisor to have them unmasked in order to understand what was being talked about. In fact until unmasked...she didn't know what those names were
     
  13. therooster

    therooster Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2014
    Messages:
    13,004
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Until your Democrats started spying on everyone ! Corrupt to the core .
     
  14. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have a point but the next step involved Obama changing and expanding who could view the intel. One of them was Podesta thus the interest in hacking his computer for info. There is only one reason to include more people and that is the political calculation.

    A point to remember here is that the FBI does the investigations, not the White House.
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2017
  15. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Another point to remember is that Rice has already lied about this saying she knew nothing about the unmasking when it is now apparent that she did.
     
  16. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do Not Buy that line of pure bunk.A National Security Advisor does not
    Investigate.That is what the F.B.I. and CIA are charged with doing.
    Rice managed to Request the Unmasking NOT for any National
    Emergency or concern for the safety of America.Which would
    be her duty.Instead she USED the Unmasking of " detailed spreadsheets "
    in an effort to play politics with the Donald Trump as candidate.
    She requested not to safeguard our Country but to be used for
    leaking in an effort to smear and besmirch Trump and associates when
    the time came to unravel his Presidency.
    This is THE Lowest form of Politics this country ever witnessed.
    Much deeper in scope and seriousness than Watergate.
    This is what guys like Joseph Stalin used to take over and
    dominate Old Russia.The gradual process of smearing and framing
    opponents.Same thing Hitler pulled against the Berlin Communists.
     
    Hoosier8 likes this.
  17. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    m
    The new takeaway is that She wasn't the one who leaked.
    meaning guys like CNN's Don lemmon do not wanna talk about
    any leaking as regards to Rice.That the Unmasking and any leaking
    are TWO Separate Debates/Issue.
    What a load a crap.That's the new takeaway.Because they feel cover
    in that a National Security Advisor Can request unmasking { only in
    the context of a National Emergency } but that Leaking is never
    allowed by anyone,ever in Government.
    So the Left is doing everything they can to separate any Leaking
    from Unmasking.Like it's ridiculous that Rice could be The leaker or
    One of the leakers.
    Because leaking is a major felony.It demands jail time.
    Someone Did leak General Flynn's name.
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2017
  18. mitchscove

    mitchscove Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    7,870
    Likes Received:
    4,479
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They've been trying to find something nefarious in the interaction between global business people and some of the wealthiest oligarchs on the planet, natural interactions, and they haven't. Failing that, after the election Obama knew who the transition team was going to have to contact on the world stage and had them surveilled to listen in on the Trump team --- 'incidentally'.
     
  19. mac1

    mac1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2013
    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Then how was Susan Rice justified in viewing those reports and unmasking those people?
     

Share This Page