Would anybody like to offer up reasons why the person or persons who provided classified material to Anthony Weiner haven't been identified, and why they aren't facing charges? I'd love to hear why that might be, given Comey's statement that there are statutes in place. Anyone?
Leftist don't care about laws if they hurt them politically. They will defend/justify anything action they think will harm them. Just ask Bill Clinton or Jon Podesta
Okay, but those on the left aren't running the show. So why doesn't AG Sessions drag Comey into his office and ask him point blank who provided the information in question to Weiner? And once given that information, why doesn't AG Sessions work to prosecute that person or persons? Enough is enough...
Because many in government have been assimilated and will protect the collectives political interest at all cost.
Trump said during the campaign that the first focus of his DOJ would be on getting illegal criminals out of the country. I don't know how much or how little of Sessions' time that is taking. Also, while this new ACA replacement is rolling out, Democrats are going to sabotage it in any way they can. I think Trump could be waiting to see the extent of that while holding prosecutor chips for trade. Huma Abedin is definitively GUILTY of breaking federal law. If you or I did what she did, we'd be swiftly in jail, do not pass GO, do not collect $200. That they have become so brazen that they can openly flout and reinterpret laws like this is very troubling for the future of our Constitutional Republic. Even in other times of serious partisan divide in this country's history, the rule of law was always observed. James Comey is a disgrace, a fake American, and should be removed ASAP. When the enforcement branch of federal law starts de facto legislating to protect political allies, we are in dire straits. Adding elements that don't exist to clear criminal statutes is de facto legislation. I am optimistic in believing that people are waking up to just how incompetent and corrupt the federal government is, all the while costing us hundreds of billions of dollars. If even 10% more people realize this due to these peccadilloes, it will have been worth it in the long run, as it gets us sooner to disassembling the rotten, illicit beast in D.C.
Just thought of something else. Trump knows that one of the main reasons he got elected is to "drain the swamp," though we have seen little of that to date. There are numerous criminal investigations and indictments that he may be holding until later in his term so that people don't forget them in the next campaign. If he waits until the 2 year of his term to begin those, prosecutions and convictions could have the maximum effect in the 3rd and 4th election years.
Who provided classified information to Anthony Weiner? Apparently no one......otherwise the FBI would have arrested the "evil doers" by now. How can someone be arrested for something that, so far, hasn't been found to have occurred?
7 times elected to House of Representatives gets you a fair amount of security clearance. Heck, being elected president once gets you a lot more no matter your penchant for sharing.
Grats. One of the ten -dumbest- things I've ever seen posted on this forum, and that's really saying something. How many people had Dahmer eaten in 1990? Apparently none... otherwise law enforcement would have arrested him by then. How can someone be arrested for something that, so far, hasn't been found to have occurred?
What did the classified information pertain to? Was it national security? Was it top secret undercover investigations? If you don't even know that then you're working on pure innuendo. From what we can tell he was investigated, and everything disclosed was benign.
I agree. There's no reason Comey SHOULDN'T have talked to "the American people" about the Russian/Trump connection the way he did about the Clinton "investigation"
I understand what you're saying but no one has been indicted, let alone arrested. The FBI believes no crime was committed..........
Wow, they just make **** up when it suits them. Unreal. The -existence- of classified Emails on Weiner's computer is ENOUGH, the way they got there is ENOUGH. There is NO intent element. Whether she should be convicted is a matter for the fact finder, NOT the enforcement branch. Maybe get out there and get and INFORMED opinion instead of just pulling things out of your ass?
It was obvious prima facie. Weiner got them from Huma Abedin who, as Hillary's chief aid, got them from Hillary. How else would Clinton emails get on Weiner's laptop? Hillary had to send them from her illegal server to another illegal server (but owned by Huma who had clearance) and then to another illegal server owned by Weiner who does not have clearance. Both Clinton and Huma are guilty of a felony; Weiner might be.
This is exactly the point. There is no intent necessary. The simple existence of classified material in an unsecured network, or making classified information available to someone not cleared for that information by a responsible authority is a crime. The simple possession of classified information is is a bit less clear.
What does the classified information pertain to? What difference does it make? It was classified! We are not working on "pure innuendo", we are working on the fact that classified information was passed to someone without clearance. Period. The FBI is not responsible for determining whether a crime was committed. The attorneys within the Justice Department are responsible for making that call. So they need to tell us why we don't have enough to take this to court. Thank you! Exactly right. This needs to be turned over to a prosecutor. I don't understand why that's so difficult for people to wrap their head around.
