What Good Would A Special Prosecutor Do?

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Dayton3, May 17, 2017.

  1. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,507
    Likes Received:
    6,752
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    People seem to be clamoring for a special prosecutor to investigate President Trump and/or his administration.

    I'm really curious.

    What do you gentlepeople think a "special prosecutor" is actually going to do?

    Oh I know. You think a "special prosecutor" is likely to decide that President Trump committed various dire offenses and present that report to Congress and Congress chooses to force Trump from office.

    With a few months (at most) from now.

    Much more likely.

    Any special prosecutor gets drug down by delays and diversions, chooses several times to change the focus of their investigation (as Kenneth Starr did) and finally, sometime around 2022 they deliver their report by which time organizations like Republican versions of "MoveOn.org" have sprung up and insist that President (or former president Trump if he lost or didn't run in 2020) be merely censured.

    By which time if out of office, former president Trump will be selling millions of copies of his books about sexually harassing women called

    "The Art of the Feel".
     
    Steady Pie likes this.
  2. PrincipleInvestment

    PrincipleInvestment Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2016
    Messages:
    23,170
    Likes Received:
    16,477
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Liberals are calling for an independent investigation. Presumably because they have no faith in Comey or the FBI. Liberals want a special prosecutor, which obviously is putting the cart before the horse. Liberals seem to lose intrest quickly once they inadvertantly draw attention to their own illicit actions, and so insist a separate investigation is needed. They'll continue to press for further panels and probes, because frankly it's all they have to occupy themselves. Dems aren't draftind legislation, their filing legal actions against legislation. Dems don't work to confirm appointees, the obstruct confirmations. Anti-Trump is all the Dems have to cling to.
     
  3. Jimmy79

    Jimmy79 Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2014
    Messages:
    9,366
    Likes Received:
    5,074
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A special prosecuter will likely be appointed by the DOJ, and if the investigation finds nothing, dems will blame politics and accuse Trump or the DOJ of collusion with the investigation. If the investigation finds offenses, the GOP will blame politics and personal biases.

    In the end, we end up exactly where we are today.
     
    Dayton3 likes this.
  4. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,864
    Likes Received:
    32,586
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I completely didagree with your characterization of what is "likely".

    At this point, comparisons to Starr's investigation are ludicrous.

    The reason that a Special Prosecutor should be appointed is the FEAR that you see coming from Trump (his cronies) and his blinded defenders every time a Special Prosecutor is mentioned.

    The OP is a version of a classic deflection tactic used by people who know that a Special Prosecutor will hasten the end of Trump.
     
  5. dairyair

    dairyair Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    79,141
    Likes Received:
    19,982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Good question for the RWers of the world. They had one for 8 yrs while B Clinton was president. Did it work for them?
     
  6. Sanskrit

    Sanskrit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2014
    Messages:
    17,082
    Likes Received:
    6,711
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They know they are running out of fuel for Trump Derangement, but a special prosecutor would fill the crab barrel right back up again for daily Trump bashing... and conveniently ignoring any unfavorable news for Democrats such as the Seth Rich assassination. Also, the crooked thugs in Congress could use it as an excuse for even more obstruction, pulling fake laws and precedent out of their ass ala "a POTUS under such serious investigation doesn't have those powers!"
     
    Dayton3 likes this.
  7. Texas Republican

    Texas Republican Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    28,121
    Likes Received:
    19,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It would drone on and on, for several years. It would find no criminal behavior, but it would tie up the Trump Administration indefinitely.

    That's the goal of the left.
     
  8. J.Idallian

    J.Idallian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    In the few days I've been here, the likes of the radical left seem to think an investigation of a conservative is enough to warrant a conviction. So, the second they actually get a special prosecutor, that should be enough to convict and impeach him on the spot.
     
  9. Texas Republican

    Texas Republican Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    28,121
    Likes Received:
    19,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fortunately, the Democrats are a regional, minority party. The adults are in charge. There will be no impeachment.
     
    navigator2 likes this.
  10. J.Idallian

    J.Idallian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2017
    Messages:
    1,286
    Likes Received:
    982
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I couldn't agree more. I'm thankful the views of the children on this, and other political sites, are a very small vocal minority.
     
  11. Cal-Pak

    Cal-Pak Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2006
    Messages:
    815
    Likes Received:
    243
    Trophy Points:
    43
    A Special Prosecutor will be able to investigate, wherever anything takes him, without interference from anybody.

    The FBI Director, directs the FBI and it's investigations.
    If the FBI Director wants Agent Smith to be the only person investigating the Trump-Russia connection.
    Agent Smith will be the only person investigating the Trump-Russia connection.
    Notice he did not "end" the investigation. But how much could one person do, all by themselves?

    That's why the Dems in the Senate are watching Trumps choice of FBI Director very closely.
     
    bois darc chunk likes this.
  12. perdidochas

    perdidochas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,293
    Likes Received:
    4,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Would allow for an investigation of the Trump/Russia connection without the possibility of Trump and his cronies corrupting it, as Obama's cronies corrupted the investigation of Hillary Clinton. I say this as a conservative Republican. There should have been a special prosecutor appointed to investigate Hillary as well.
     
  13. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,519
    Likes Received:
    15,752
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol...I doubt it. This sounds like predictable partisan dishonesty.
    No doubt you'd be clamoring for a special prosecutor to investigate a President Clinton and/or her administration.
     
  14. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,507
    Likes Received:
    6,752
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I was always against the special prosecutor law.
     
  15. ButterBalls

    ButterBalls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    51,806
    Likes Received:
    38,159
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Other than a digital Viagra for the penile dysfunctional left, not much ;)
     
  16. EyesWideOpen

    EyesWideOpen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2013
    Messages:
    4,743
    Likes Received:
    2,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The first thing you need to decide on is the specific crime the prosecutor is supposed to prosecute a person for doing. Was the crime sending phishing emails to DNC and Podesta, or hacking the voter databases in Arizona and Illinois?

    What crime is this prosecutor supposed to prosecute someone for???
     
  17. dadoalex

    dadoalex Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    10,894
    Likes Received:
    2,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not sure what your point is or if you have one but...

    Trump has tainted the investigation first by trying to influence Comey and then by firing Comey. At this point Trump could appoint Trump could appoint Jesus, Moses, and the Dali Lama to do the investigation and its credibility would be questioned.

    An independent counsel appointed by Congress would give some semblance of independence to the investigation no matter the result.
     
  18. EyesWideOpen

    EyesWideOpen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2013
    Messages:
    4,743
    Likes Received:
    2,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The plan on the left is to whip up the exaggeration and hyperbole in the media, get the Democratic Party politicians to repeat it, and get their special prosecutor.

    Then.... search for a crime that might have been committed. Then try to link that crime to Trump.

    This is nothing but the left trying to use a bastardization of justice, to conduct an old fashioned Democrat lynching.
     
    Last edited: May 17, 2017
  19. EyesWideOpen

    EyesWideOpen Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2013
    Messages:
    4,743
    Likes Received:
    2,541
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Investigation for what crime? I don't think you know.

    The purpose of this special prosecutor is clear, it's Trump-haters using the justice department to find a crime, and try and pin it on the hated Trump.
     
  20. jackson33

    jackson33 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,445
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    -----------
     
    Last edited: May 17, 2017
  21. jackson33

    jackson33 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,445
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    It's all about "mid terms". Special Investigations" tend to take a great deal of time, much more than a few months, but keep an issue on stand-by for political use. When and where needed, either direction, that issue can be raised, for political purposes. Right now 435 members (all) of the House are up for reelection in 2018, as are many Senators, primarily with Democrats that are running in States Trump carried last year. The thought by the DNC is that any "special investigation" will help them and that's probably correct. Some are suggesting if they do win the Senate back, impeachment will be likely in the first month, from the then Senate.
     
  22. Dayton3

    Dayton3 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2009
    Messages:
    25,507
    Likes Received:
    6,752
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Impeachment proceedings are not started in the Senate and the Senate does not get involved unless the House votes to impeach and send the case to the Senate for trial.
     
  23. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you're saying we shouldn't find the truth because Republicans will obstruct?
     
  24. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You're right. People need to vote these corrupt Republicans out of the House
     
  25. JusticeOne

    JusticeOne Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages:
    951
    Likes Received:
    216
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    Hoozah and Haroo
     

Share This Page