Senator Blumenthal: ban bump stocks, semiautomatics, and high capacity magazines

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by Galileo, Oct 3, 2017.

  1. Xenamnes

    Xenamnes Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    23,895
    Likes Received:
    7,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The AR-15, and rifles similar to it, are defensive firearms.
     
    6Gunner likes this.
  2. drluggit

    drluggit Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2016
    Messages:
    31,147
    Likes Received:
    28,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sweet. Blinders and all.
     
  3. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Heller rules, and SCOTUS will continue to rule on guns, particularly on what are weapons of war.
     
  4. Small Town Guy

    Small Town Guy Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2013
    Messages:
    4,294
    Likes Received:
    354
    Trophy Points:
    83
    1. Worked so well in the war on drugs
     
  5. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Small Town Guy has given us a fallacy of false equivalency.

    Be specific. Show us exactly how it won't work for guns.
     
  6. Greataxe

    Greataxe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2011
    Messages:
    9,400
    Likes Received:
    1,348
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    America looks more like Mexico and Brazil every day. Both nations have had gun control laws even more strict than Blumenthal proposes.

    How will failed gun control laws work with morally debased people here, anymore than they work with the same people there?
     
  7. OrlandoChuck

    OrlandoChuck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What makes one semi auto more efficient than another at killing humans in numbers?
     
  8. tom444

    tom444 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    1,110
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    In all seriousness, and I'm not dodging, you can't figure that out? Isn't it obvious?
     
    JakeStarkey likes this.
  9. OrlandoChuck

    OrlandoChuck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I want your interpretation of what makes one semi auto more effective than others at killing humans in numbers... as you put it.
     
  10. tom444

    tom444 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    1,110
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No I want to know why you can't figure out the obvious? Why militaries pick one over another? Why the Vegas shooter picked what he did? Why the Orlando shooter picked the one he did?
     
    JakeStarkey likes this.
  11. OrlandoChuck

    OrlandoChuck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You are dodging. You cant discern between semi auto firearms as to why one should be banned and yet another not. What components make one deadlier than another?
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2017
  12. tom444

    tom444 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    1,110
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm not dodging anything. I'll point it out, but you do some work. Why do militaries pick one over another? Why did the Vegas shooter pick what he did? Come on, you're suppose to be a firearms instructor.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2017
  13. OrlandoChuck

    OrlandoChuck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I am a firearms instructor. You are avoiding a legitimate question by deflecting in what is supposed to be an honest debate.
     
  14. tom444

    tom444 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    1,110
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You mean to tell me you don't why a military would pick one battle rifle over another? One assault rifle over another? That's your honest reply?
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2017
  15. OrlandoChuck

    OrlandoChuck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your missing the point of my question. I want to know what YOU think.
     
  16. tom444

    tom444 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    1,110
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You're missing the point. You tell me why a military would pick one weapon to be used to kill people effectively, and more easily, than another weapon for it's infantry units?
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2017
  17. tom444

    tom444 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    1,110
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You asked me this question, "What makes one semi auto more efficient than another at killing humans in numbers?". I'm answering you. Why do you think military units pick one over another? What about one makes it a better choice than another? There in lies the answer to your question.
     
  18. OrlandoChuck

    OrlandoChuck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,002
    Likes Received:
    1,313
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have accepted that you will not answer my question just as I had predicted.
     
    Rucker61 likes this.
  19. tom444

    tom444 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    1,110
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I accept that I answered it, and you can't own up to it, just as I figured.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2017
  20. Jestsayin

    Jestsayin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    Messages:
    16,798
    Likes Received:
    17,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They can be used for a multiple of purposes.
     
  21. Jestsayin

    Jestsayin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    Messages:
    16,798
    Likes Received:
    17,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Tom444 you really need to understand that rifles that are used in what lefties call "gun violence" are a tiny fraction of the total deaths. If you really want to stop trolling and do some good. Start here with the democrat controlled city of Chicago.
    http://www.ebony.com/news-views/enough-chicago-murder-by-the-numbers-405#ixzz4vJiRd7Mg
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2017
  22. tom444

    tom444 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    1,110
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You need to follow the discussion. I'm only talking about one kind of gun violence. You can troll about the others elsewhere.
     
  23. Jestsayin

    Jestsayin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    Messages:
    16,798
    Likes Received:
    17,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Specifically what kind of "gun violence" are you talking about?
     
  24. 6Gunner

    6Gunner Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,631
    Likes Received:
    4,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Um, no. It says, specifically, "the right of the people". The Founders spoke on the issue extensively, and clearly intended it to be a "right of the people". The reason was to enable the people to function as part of a "well regulated" (i.e. properly equipped) citizens militia, but the right was intrinsic to the people. It is a right, which is for the people. Government doesn't have rights; it has powers, and the Founders wanted the people to have the means to be armed at least partially so they would not be helpless in the face of authoritarian government... and they did NOT like the idea of a standing army.

    Your argument has been rendered void by the Supreme Court itself.
     
  25. 6Gunner

    6Gunner Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,631
    Likes Received:
    4,062
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Because it never has, and there is not one example where a gun ban was passed where crime and violence was subsequently reduced in any substantive way.

    Laws affect only the law-abiding, not the criminals. Ban something, and all you create is a black market for it and the concurrent crime and violence intrinsic thereto.
     

Share This Page