White Genocide?

Sadly you make sense to yourself.

 

I absolutely agree. I personally am wishing with all my heart that a certain class of white people go extinct. Preferrably in a mass suicide in protest of their own oppression and impending genocide. Considering that would leave the rest of us to get on with moving forward it can only be viewed as a positive.

I'm frankly disgusted to note that when you say "we", I am included by the mere accident of my birth.

 

It isn't race mixing.

It is Genetic Diversity!

There are populations in the Tennesee valley, in the Ozarks back woods, with 100% "White" People, and all too little genetic diversity.

There are populations in Montana, with 100% "White People, and adequate genetic diversity.

Race is not the same thing as Genetic Diversity.

And what is worth preserving about the "White" Race, has nothing to do with Genetics, and everything to do with Culture, Values, and Character! The teachings of John Locke are worth preserving!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke

The teachings of the Blind Imam are not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omar_Abdel-Rahman


The difference between the two has NOTHING to do with genetics or their skin-tone.


-

 

I would say fear not. The folks who are in favor of things like this are on the fringe. There are not many of them. Most folks want to live their life in peace. The "liberal progressive movement" was a fad and has just about ran its course, as fads do. The next fad will be optimism and patriotism. Why? Because folks are sick of all the whining from the left. While misery does love company, the miserable left wing radicals have worn out their welcome. Time for them to go back where they came from.

 

Think of what an absurd idea white genocide is. Why is this idea even being floated? Because fads get more absurd toward their demise. As they lose relevance, those who are into the fad desperately cling to it and try to keep it mainstream by pushing it more and more. In doing so the fad produces more absurd ideas.....just like disco.

I remember some folks hanging on to the mullet:



Yikes!

 

When I look at these historic immigration populations that arrived, whether it was Germans, or Italians, or assorted African tribes, or Vietnamese, or Mexicans, or Chinese, or whatever. I do not see 'assemelation' as a one way street. We change them; they change us. Then both sides gain value from the cultural exchange. I am not scared of immigration influxes and I do not demand 'assemelation' from immigrant populations. its the stubborn ones that refuse, that will carry their culture and its strengths yet another generation for us to learn from.

 

Sure... the idea of "Race" is absurd.

However...

If enough people, just in America, or worse, world wide, buy into the idea that you can "SEE" Racial Guilt in Blond hair and Blue Eyes, and then ACT on it!



We could have the stain of another Holocaust on the world's soul!

"Race" is an Artificial Social Construct.

So was the Soviet Union. The Soviets and Communism, another Artificial Social Construct, killed 10s of Millions of their own people!

IMHO, people who buy into "White Privilege" are dangerous.

-

 

That is just it, people are sick of it and not buying into it.

 

Tell that to the players of the NFL!

-

 

Screw them, I believe the fans are speaking loud and clear.

 

I agree, but Hitler's murder of Europe's Jews was beyond insanity. If had simply removed them from power and had made them leave the country (something I wouldn't have supported regardless), it would have kept nationalism in the heart of Europe.

 

His original intention was to deport them. He spent time and resources trying to secure a location for them in Madagascar and Russia. He wanted them to have their own country. If Germany wasn't declared war on something like that could have happened.

 

Being white is racists.

 

Not really. He never formulated solid plans to deport the Jews. There were only 500,000 Jews in Germany at the time. Hitler could have easily mass deported them to a section of newly occupied Austria and given them their own homeland.

I, again, state on record I wouldn't have supported forcing German Jews from leaving their country. I'm saying given he wanted Germany for Germans only, he went about it in the worst way possible.

 

Why would he send them to Austria? That was German land according to him, and he didn't want them in Germany.

Look into the Madagascar plan. It was a solid plan.

 

It never panned out, logistically. If Hitler had been willing to give over a piece of Germany/Austria to the German Jews who had called Germany home for 1,000 years, it would have resulted in the saving of millions of lives.

Hitler's only goal should have been preservation of Germany because the conquest of Europe was a fool's errand. He had Germany under his power and the 500,000 Jews would have willingly gone to a new Jewish homeland in/near German rather than face the Holocaust. It is also very immoral to demand that German Jews who are culturally/ethnically European to go move to Africa or the Middle East.

Your opinion on my post, @Ronstar.

 

It wasn't very immoral for the Zionist Jews. They made a deal with the Nazis to transfer German Jews to Palestine. It's a fact many Jews deny to this day. Incidentally, Hitler had Europe under his feet. Many regimes happily cooperated with Germans. The mistake was to attack the Soviet Union. That was Hitler's downfall.

1933: Zionists sign a deal with Hitler - The Transfer Agreement
The Transfer Agreement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Transfer Agreement: The Dramatic Story of the Pact Between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine is a book written by author Edwin Black, documenting the agreement between Zionist Jews and Adolf Hitler to help create a Jewish state in Palestine, in return for an end of a global boycott of Nazi Germany that had threatened to bring it down in its first days of power.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article32941.htm

Video -Posted November 05, 2012

 

Whites created that culture, those values, and that character that you are referencing. Why would you assume other groups, who have never created or adopted these things for themselves in their own countries, are going to continue on with these things in the West, once whites are gone? Culture is something that comes from within a society, not from those outside of the society who try to play the part. That's why non-white groups in the West, by and large, still retain their own cultures and identity, even while living in the West.

The left seeks to destroy Western civilization and you've internalized the primary mechanism in which they hope to accomplish this goal. Just remove all the people responsible for that civilization and hope that their replacements will pick up the torch.

You're probably the first generation in human history that didn't see the importance of your own people surviving into the future. How does it feel?

 

You not knowing anything about it doesn't make it "absurd" at all. It's being "floated" because other people, who are knowledgeable on the topic, are concerned about it. You're not, and that's all there is to it.

 

Languages are also an "artificial social construct", but nobody argues that they are not real, or that there is no meaningful difference between them. This "construct" talking point is also based on a lot of left-wing, agenda-based science, which you probably are skeptical of when it comes to things like climate change, even when there is nearly a consensus on that issue.

Did you know that white people (and Asians) have up to 4% of their DNA attributable to Neanderthals, while black Africans have no Neanderthal DNA? They've determined that Neanderthals were different enough from homo sapiens to be categorized as another species, so how can race simply be a "social construct" when there are people who have the DNA of a different species in them, and others do not?

 

Being floated by who? The two black panthers left on the planet? It is an absurd idea. There are people who believe alien lizards live among us. That doea not make it so.

What else ya got?

 

So whites go from 25% of the world population to less than 10% in 100 years, and are on track to becoming ethnic minorities in their own countries within the next 100 years, and the idea that they are facing genocide is an "absurd idea" to you?

 

Yes. What does a decline in demographics have to do with genocide? Sounds like whites are just not reproducing or perhaps the races are mixing.

How about providing actual proof of this claim?

 

Is it the shape shifting lizard people who are out to kill whitey?

 

White people are having less children because they have gotten smart. This system punishes you for having children. hard enough to support one self without adding more mouths to the equation. So the military industrial complex decides to flood white countries with cultures that breed like flies to get the system pumping out the porfit for the already insanely criminally rich 1%. These immigrants (legal invaders) think they are coming into freedom, but they are walking into debt slavery. Yes white cultural genocide is real.