How do you feel about all these harrassment claims?

This is a hot mess. I think you took it too far. Lol.

 

That's disgusting.

 

Here's more:

 

I'd have to say it depends on the situation because with out a specific reference to go by I'd normally be of the mind of if it wasn't dealt with 10-20 years ago then it obviously wasn't important enough to push the matter. I mean that's like the same concept as having a divorced wife who wanted out because you were an ass and didn't claim alimony because you were broke and then 10-20 years down the road find out you became rich trying to sue for back alimony. Kind of retarded if you ask me.

 

Why is it hard to understand women didn't have a voice back then?

 

It used to be very difficult to run the marathon and make it through the gauntlet of military flight training and get into an operational unit. 50% washout rates and then being downgraded to flying a desk were not uncommon. Most likely it still is very difficult.

And women are making it through. The military is the best way to become a truly good pilot and it is a great opportunity for men and women who have the right stuff.

The airlines used to prefer a pilot with military experience. No sure if that is still the case.

I knew a guy who graduated Embry-Riddle and had all the qualifications for airline pilot. But he didn't want to fly to Pack-6 or get drafted, so he gained 125 pounds to avoid it. When the draft went off he lost all the weight and began applying to the airlines. None of them would talk to him. He is still flying a Piper Cub last I heard.

 

i don't think so. too many credible reports.

 

Maybe because I was alive back then and they had plenty of voice so if they didn't use it that's their own damn fault. Any more questions?

 

Please don't share anymore on this thread. Build on your 22 posts elsewhere. Thank you for your contributions.

 

You should really work on keeping your rudeness to yourself. Thank you.

 

Serious posts about the topic please.

 

Wow. Even more getting busted.

 

The author of this and the vast majority of posts in this thread are completely missing the point.

Men aren’t afraaid that they’re going to get accused of sexual harrassment when they’ve actually sexually harassed someone. The issue is that they’re concerned they’re going to be accused of sexual harrassment when they haven’t sexually harassed anyone.

THeyre afraid because if they piss off a female coworker for any reason, all she has to do is say, “when we were in the break room Todd touched me inappropriately” or “Todd said some very sexual things to me. “ And even though they have ZERO evidence the man is screwrd because the woman’s word will be believed over him. And that risk just isn’t worth taking. Let the women fend for themselves.

 

Why do people like you think this is acceptable? When you say “it will probably go too far”, what you’re saying is that it’s okay to punish men some. We have to punish men to get to equality. We have to punish white people to get back to equality. We have to punish Christians to get back to equality.

What in God’s name makes you so delusional that you there no that type of action isn’t just going to cause resentment and hate for the other side and make the problem worse?

 

Isn't that retaliation? And that is illegal in most situations. The best case is to calm down and let the correction happen. Folks can't go unpunished. There has to be consequences.

 

You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Jesus spoke about indentured servitude. You do not release slaves after 7 years. You release indentured servants after seven years. Which is what Jesus was referencing.

Furthermore, enjoy your gay marriage while it lasts. When Kennedy retires or Ginsburg dies, Trump is going to put the uber conservative William Pryor on the supreme court. And when that happens you can say goodbye to gay marriage. Even the hypocrite Kennedy won't be able to save it lol

 

Should a woman's word be more legally accepted than a man's?

Because that's what's going on.

 

Keep it respectful please. Thank you.

 

What did I say that wasn't respectful? That he didn't know what he's talking about? I can't help that. He's clearly speaking about something he's not educated on.

 

If they just now have a voice then how is that? They previously had no voice, no legal acceptance, etc.

 

But you don't fix discrimination with more discrimination. That simply results in hatred and resentment for the other side.

 

It isn't viewed as discrimination. How would you fix things?

 

Sounds like you can't condemn God for approving of being ok with BEATING SLAVES TO DEATH (as long as the death drags out past a day or two)?
What does the Bible say about beating slaves? It says you can beat both male and female slaves with a rod so hard that as long as they don’t die right away you are cleared of any wrong doing

When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)

 

Does sending ethical non-believer to a fiery torture in hell "result in hatred and resentment for the other side"? I would say OF COURSE it does. What about you?

 

You don't think it's discriminatory to inherently believe a woman's word over a man when they have nothing to back up their claims? I think that's blatant sexism.

If they want equality I'm all for it. A woman's word should not inherently be believed over a man's just like a man's shouldn't inherently be believed over a woman's. If all you have is a he said / she said then no action should be taken. If there is evidence then that's different.

However, if they want to be able to just accuse any man at any time with zero evidence and have that man's life and career destroyed because of it, then that should be considered abhorrent.