Safety.... I get the 2 points...I gave you his words... you gave me a misrepresentation of said words..... At no point has Al Franken admitted molesting anybody... and no misrepresenting article can change that...
Apparently, you don't realize the word "allegation" is the subject of the sentence. An allegation is just that, regardless of the meat of the charge. Both are allegations. One does not carry weight or credibility over the other. If Franken's crap is nothing but allegations (only to the stupidly blind who can't see the picture), so is Moore's. DOH! Now...your mission for today is to diagram your own sentence. Remember, ALLEGATION is the subject. Now off ya go!
Just because he doesn't know the law doesn't excuse you. Sexual assault is any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient. Falling under the definition of sexual assault are sexual activities as forced sexual intercourse, forcible sodomy, child molestation, incest, fondling, and attempted rape. https://www.justice.gov/ovw/sexual-assault So, now that we have confirmed Al sexually assaulted the woman in the picture do you agree he should go or not?
Well, it's not really faked news by the USNews site, but it was spun to make his admission sound worse than it is..... Today was the first time I read that particular report of the first accuser and apology. However, it's a major misrepresentation by this poster that 'admission of "completely inappropriate" actions' refers to any molesting allegations. The "completely inappropriate" Franken quote was in reference to the famous picture, which as we all should know is not evidence of molestation.... It's a shortcut by folks unable to distinguish hard facts from spin, which is a huge problem in this country (frankly on both sides sometimes) But thanks for the support... It's a hard time for RW'ers on here, having to defend Trump 24x7 and still try and stay on top of other issues..
I quoted the law directly. No surprise you cut that out of your reply. Its easier to fabricate a non response than address the law isn't it.
The strawman is the conclusion you drew........the wish strawman. Get it yet? I'll wait.........not really.
And... what do you think of the people who want him to rescind said resignation - especially those that called for it?
Your "we confirmed" was total nonsense, the strawman. Opinion & no credible factual basis for your conclusion using the royal "we" for comfort.
I think I'm on the record for that with my posts #10 and #23, but if not clear, they SUCK and they don't get to take it back.... He's still welcome to rescind, but he won't.
No its not. His act was sexual and that is what the law requires and she was asleep so she could not consent which again is what the law requires. The picture is the evidence. The only way you can deny it is denying the law which of course you usually do when you're caught. Try educating yourself on the law next time.
LOL, if this was a LEGAL issue, it would be in the courts.... don't keep throwing the LAW in this conversation... this is strictly a political and societal situation...
You post is nonsense as usual and now you want to side step to "my education" as a comfort zone strawman to hide behind. You are projecting fear, understandable really.
Yeah I've noticed they all act like they are God's gift to women. All want to be thought of like Bill Clinton.