Fake news. Except for anything to do with US state of Israel. Phew, I almost suffered from some cognitive dissonance there but my little manipulated mind pluckily was able to lie its way back to my little manipulated comfort zone. Signed, Identikit Ziotard III.
United States will support both economically and militarily it's most important ally in the Middle East, Israel. And that's that. Palestinians? Looks like, not before they stop naming streets after murderers, and pay stipends to the families of terrorists. And that's that, too.
The Palestinians have had a seething desire to drive the Israelis out of the Middle East ever since the 1948 partition of the land they now occupy. And the location of our embassy in Tel Aviv hasn't gained the Israelis or ourselves any relief from the long violent history of the Palestinians. Merely wanting your neighbors dead isn't reason enough for the era of terrorism and senseless death that we've experienced for the last five or six decades due to the Palestinians and their enablers. I guess people like you would like to see us just walk away from the Israelis and leave them to the vipers all around them.
Trump recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Moving the embassy followed. Recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel means ignoring Palestinians. Anti-Zionist Jews living in Israel call that policy "racist".
You lack knowledge of the history of Palestine and the partitioning. You have substituted propaganda for that history.
If even CNN got this right there must be no legitimate way to say Trump was wrong. I halfway expect a clarification if not a full retraction though after their viewers start complaining in mass.
General rule of thumb is that if it takes 4 sentences to tie something to racism, then it's probably not racist. But I think you know that considering you put the words racist in quotes. Also, since when is Palestine a race?
You can invent all the arguments, valid or not, that you want. If it takes more than one sentence to discredit a person or idea, then the person or idea is probably valid and accurate. I simply quoted terms used by anti-Zionist Jews in Israel.
just no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_engineering The send billions over to Israel, and got very little to show for. It should have been invested in America first. The infrastructure of the US is in shambles.
So I know. I've studied the issue from both sides. Have you? Did you know there are "Jews Against Zionism" organizations in Israel? I doubt it.
The joke is on people in our country who buy into the chosen people claim and therefore support the ongoing Israel first policy. One reason this is a joke is that Israel is a country founded on a myth, i.e., Exodus never happened. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Evidence_for_the_Exodus
WOW! Is there? Yeah...I knew that. That's about as impressive as all the wacked out white sociology academics who want white people exterminated. Your so called knowledge is anecdotal and undocumented, as far as I can see.
I understand your analogy but IMHO it is not a good analogy. The word "white" describes a race. I don't think Jews are considered to be a race. If they are a race, then Zionism is racism.
Right, you're talking but I was right: you don't know. But blab on. https://sites.google.com/site/jewsagainstracistzionism/
It's perfectly acceptable when you consider that racial or ethnic outliers, like virulently anti white white people, do not necessarily, by their standards alone, make for a rational argument (genocide is rarely rational). Therefore merely by virtue of being a Jew who is anti Zionist, that says very little indeed about that position.
And only a real honest-to-goodness ignoramus would say a claim is "anecdotal and undocumented" and then ignore the documentation. I hope you're not that ignoramus.