A Kansas chemistry professor got his kids ready for school — then ICE arrested him on his front lawn

do you have anything worthwhile to say or did you just want to have a fit of verbal diarrhea

 

Some good news.
Man Facing Deportation From Kansas Gets Temporary Stay
An adjunct college chemistry instructor living in Kansas who faced imminent deportation to Bangladesh has been granted a temporary stay.
Hopefully ICE will get back to work protecting our borders from bad people and let the judge order a review of his immigration status without a fight.

 

8 USC Section 2324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
a)Criminal penalties
alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;
alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;
alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;
alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law; or
alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs—
section 1365 of title 18) to, or places in jeopardy the life of, any person, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and
[1] (ii) or (iii) of subparagraph (A), or of clause (iv) of subparagraph (A) except where a person encourages or induces an alien to come to or enter the United States, for a religious denomination having a bona fide nonprofit, religious organization in the United States, or the agents or officers of such denomination or organization, to encourage, invite, call, allow, or enable an alien who is present in the United States to perform the vocation of a minister or missionary for the denomination or organization in the United States as a volunteer who is not compensated as an employee, notwithstanding the provision of room, board, travel, medical assistance, and other basic living expenses, provided the minister or missionary has been a member of the denomination for at least one year.
alien has not received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of any official action which may later be taken with respect to such alien shall, for each alien in respect to whom a violation of this paragraph occurs—
alienunlawfully brought into the United States will commit an offense against the United States or any State punishable by imprisonment for more than 1 year,
alien is not upon arrival immediately brought and presented to an appropriate immigration officer at a designated port of entry,
be fined under title 18 and shall be imprisoned, in the case of a first or second violation of subparagraph (B)(iii), not more than 10 years, in the case of a first or second violation of subparagraph (B)(i) or (B)(ii), not less than 3 nor more than 10 years, and for any other violation, not less than 5 nor more than 15 years.
aliens described in subparagraph (B) shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.
alien described in this subparagraph is an alien who—
alien (as defined in section 1324a(h)(3) of this title), and
United States in violation of this subsection.
aliens into the United States in violation of this subsection, the sentence otherwise provided for may be increased by up to 10 years if—
organization or enterprise;
aliens were transported in groups of 10 or more; and
aliens were transported in a manner that endangered their lives; or
aliens presented a life-threatening health risk to people in the United States.
chapter 46 of title 18 relating to civil forfeitures, including section 981(d) of such title, except that such duties as are imposed upon the Secretary of the Treasury under the customs laws described in that section shall be performed by such officers, agents, and other persons as may be designated for that purpose by the Attorney General.

 

8 USC Section 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens continued . . .
alien involved in the alleged violation had not received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States or that such alien had come to, entered, or remained in the United States in violation of law:
alien’s status was an issue and in which it was determined that the alien had not received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States or that such alien had come to, entered, or remained in the United States in violation of law.
Service or of the Department of State showing that the alien had not received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States or that such alien had come to, entered, or remained in the United States in violation of law.
immigration officer having personal knowledge of the facts concerning that alien’s status, that the alien had not received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States or that such alien had come to, entered, or remained in the United States in violation of law.

Service designated by the Attorney General, either individually or as a member of a class, and all other officers whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws.


United States, or is otherwise unable to testify, may be admitted into evidence in an action brought for that violation if the witness was available for cross examination and the deposition otherwise complies with the Federal Rules of Evidence.


Attorney General and the Secretary of State, as appropriate, shall develop and implement an outreach program to educate the public in the United States and abroad about the penalties for bringing in and harboring aliens in violation of this section.


(June 27, 1952, ch. 477, title II, ch. 8, § 274, 66 Stat. 228; Pub. L. 95–582, § 2, Nov. 2, 1978, 92 Stat. 2479; Pub. L. 97–116, § 12, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1617; Pub. L. 99–603, title I, § 112, Nov. 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3381; Pub. L. 100–525, § 2(d), Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2610; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60024, Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1981; Pub. L. 104–208, div. C, title II, §§ 203(a)–(d), 219, title VI, § 671(a)(1), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–565, 3009–566, 3009–574, 3009–720; Pub. L. 106–185, § 18(a), Apr. 25, 2000, 114 Stat. 222; Pub. L. 108–458, title V, § 5401, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3737; Pub. L. 109–97, title VII, § 796, Nov. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 2165.)

[1]  So in original. Probably should be “clause”.

 

Protecting the border is U.S. Customs and Border Protection is guarding the border along with the Patriot movements in the several border states I.C.E. has the responsibility of tracking down known fugitives from justice including those who overstay visas.

Apprehending murders and rapists is the responsibility of the local police departments of the several towns, villages and hamlets of the several states, the sheriff’s departments of the several counties of the several states, the several state police departments of the several states and the Federal Bureau of Investigation of the United States of [North] America. As to those people with families, they are well aware, so they know that they are here illegally so therefore they are criminals, and besides, if they are so concerned about their families, they can all go BACK from whence they came from for the same of family cohesion. So stop the madness, posting as though you are in some law enforcement capacity, and if you are, you surely have demonstrated that you are incapable and unwilling to perform your employment responsibilities, faithfully.

 

This gebonee from Bangaladesh did not come in through Mexico so the wall which Trumpwants us to pay for would not stop illegals such as him.

My guess is that this gebonee overstayed his visa. As I have said we need to increase patrols on th borders and hunt down those who overstay their visas.

 

So your solution because some illegal came from Bangladesh is to ignore the Southern Continental border of these United States of [North] America, which is preposterous. Do you know the amount of people who come from Bangladesh illegally? What about the amount of people who come here illegally from India? Now, juxtapose this with the amount that come through the Southern Continental border of these United States or [North] America.
Let us use these numbers:

source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_immigrant_population_of_the_United_States
If the information is incorrect, take the issue up with wikipedia.

 

8 U.S. Code § 1324a - Unlawful employment of aliens
(a)Making employment of unauthorized aliens unlawful
entity—
United States an alien knowing the alien is an unauthorized alien (as defined in subsection (h)(3)) with respect to such employment, or
United States an individual without complying with the requirements of subsection (b) or (ii) if the person or entity is an agricultural association, agricultural employer, or farm labor contractor (as defined in section 1802 of title 29), to hire, or to recruit or refer for a fee, for employment in the United States an individual without complying with the requirements of subsection (b).
entity, after hiring an alien for employment in accordance with paragraph (1), to continue to employ the alien in the United States knowing the alien is (or has become) an unauthorized alien with respect to such employment.

entity that establishes that it has complied in good faith with the requirements of subsection (b) with respect to the hiring, recruiting, or referral for employment of an alien in the United States has established an affirmative defense that the person or entity has not violated paragraph (1)(A) with respect to such hiring, recruiting, or referral.

entity who uses a contract, subcontract, or exchange, entered into, renegotiated, or extended after November 6, 1986, to obtain the labor of an alien in the United States knowing that the alien is an unauthorized alien (as defined in subsection (h)(3)) with respect to performing such labor, shall be considered to have hired the alien for employment in the United States in violation of paragraph (1)(A).

entity shall be deemed to have complied with the requirements of subsection (b) with respect to the hiring of an individual who was referred for such employment by a State employment agency (as defined by the Attorney General), if the person or entity has and retains (for the period and in the manner described in subsection (b)(3)) appropriate documentation of such referral by that agency, which documentation certifies that the agency has complied with the procedures specified in subsection (b) with respect to the individual’s referral.

organizations and an association of two or more employers, by an employer that is a member of such association, and
employer that is a member of the association (or an agent of such association on behalf of the employer) has complied with the requirements of subsection (b) with respect to the employment of the individual,
the subsequent employer shall be deemed to have complied with the requirements of subsection (b) with respect to the hiring of the employee and shall not be liable for civil penalties described in subsection (e)(5).
United States.

employer that is a member of an association hires for employment in the United States an individual and relies upon the provisions of subparagraph (A) to comply with the requirements of subsection (b) and the individual is an alien not authorized to work in the United States, then for the purposes of paragraph (1)(A), subject to clause (ii), the employer shall be presumed to have known at the time of hiring or afterward that the individual was an alien not authorized to work in the United States.

employer only through the presentation of clear and convincing evidence that the employer did not know (and could not reasonably have known) that the individual at the time of hiring or afterward was an alien not authorized to work in the United States.

entity” includes an entity in any branch of the Federal Government.

entity hiring, recruiting, or referring an individual for employment in the United States, the requirements specified in the following three paragraphs:
entity must attest, under penalty of perjury and on a form designated or established by the Attorney General by regulation, that it has verified that the individual is not an unauthorized alien by examining—
entity has complied with the requirement of this paragraph with respect to examination of a document if the document reasonably appears on its face to be genuine. If an individual provides a document or combination of documents that reasonably appears on its face to be genuine and that is sufficient to meet the requirements of the first sentence of this paragraph, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as requiring the person or entity to solicit the production of any other document or as requiring the individual to produce such another document.

 

8 U.S. Code § 1324a - Unlawful employment of aliens . . . continued
source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1324a

 

He was legally employed as per the conditions of earlier stay by a judge.

 

Did I say ignore the Southern Continental border of these United States of [North] America" NO I DID NOT say that. It is preposterous for you to accuse me of saying something that I did not say.

I was not claiming that illegals from non southern border sourses are more numerous but you seem to have gone berserk and are claiming falsely that was am. Read what I wrote.

The southern border does not need a physical wall over 100% of the length to secure it. Added patrols, border agents, razor wire fencing, drones , electronic listening devices, and maybe we need to consider armed drones is how to better secure that border.

You need to understand that the southern border is not the only access point for illegals. Of course a high volume came in that way. Those who come in via air and over-stay their visas are important to keep track of and prevent from staying here illegally.
Islamic illegals andIslamic terrorists will not come in through the southern border, they will fly in.

I did not in any way say that the southern border should be ignored so your going berserk flaming that is preposterous.

 

Ahem, if he was NOT in this country legally, how could he have been legally employed?

 

If you are protesting the deportation of the known criminals who have violated United States federal immigration, than YES YOU ARE through inference. If you do not live near the southern continental border of these United States of [North] America, than how can you positively state that a wall is not needed to secure said border? I do not live near the southern continental border of these United States of [North] America, so I go by what people who are near the southern continental border of these United States of [North] America state when it comes to building or constructing a border wall.

 

If he was on the country illegally then the school where he worked was violating the law

 

I agree which is why I think that people should listen to what Acting Director Thomas Homan says about those who "coddle" those who are here illegally.

 

Why do you post such delusional crap and accuse me of protesting deportation of known criminals. You need to stop attributing things to me thatvI never said. That could be construed as posting lies about me.

It is my opinion that there are other more effective and and efficient ways to secure that border and I specific several of them. BTW there are people who live on the border who oppose a physical wall others

 

I told you, the same order by the court that required he check in annually also gave him a non permanent work permit.

 

"Harold Rosenthal, to staffer to Senator Jacob Javits said in an interview on the topic of Jewish media control"The people are only stupid pigs that grunt and squeal at the chants we give them"

As long as people believe whatever they are told without requiring evidence,there will be deception.Illegals are protesting everywhere,meeting with politicians,meeting with community activists and ICE is nowhere to be found. The Jew media always has a sob story to play the masses,yet in a time that %95+ people have cell phones with video cameras there isn't any PROOF that ICE is arresting anyone. While people pull their video out to record anything nowadays, you believe these stories with no proof?Not a single ICE sweep caught on camera. There are propaganda photos...and that's it,these appease the right,while pissing off the left.

 

The guy should have complied with the law. Now he's made the situation worse by having kids etc..

He might be a professor but he didn't have the common sense to keep his visa etc.. in order. The law doesn't exempt people based on job status.

Golden rule, "If you can't do the time, don't do the crime". If he doesn't want to be deported, then why stop complying with the law? His doing, no one elses.

 

But just for once the fact that overstaying a visa is not a crime is in ICE's favor.
If there is no crime then there is no court appearance, no attorneys saying how wonderful he is and that he has adopted some abandoned puppies, no appeals, just simply tell him it's time to leave. There is no second choice.

 

I cant argue with that

But I still want these cheaters punished

At least they can be deported and denied a visa in the future

 

It is obvious that he did something that alerted I.C.E., like overstaying his visa, which is common.

 

THE Golden rule is to do unto others as you would have done upon yourself. There but for the Grace of God go I used to demonstrate compassion in our society, no longer it seems.

 

I am well aware that there are people who live near the border who are not in favor of a wall, this is obvious. Now, as for you and others constantly inferring that other whom you and they disagree with are delusional, I do not complain about such because I know that it is non-applicable. The very fact of you wanting give such people a pathway to citizenship, is actually rewarding criminal behavior. In case you have forgotten, entering into the country without permission is in itself a crime. Be it only a misdemeanor, it is still a criminal offense. So by the very fact of you voicing support for illegals staying in these United States of [North] America, you are supporting criminal behavior. There was a reason why I posted what I did of 8 U.S.C. in regards to immigration. The reason was to show that it is an actual crime for those people to be in country, and ALL who protest the drive and move to deport them all, are in fact, supporting criminal behavior. Even if you overstay a temporary work visa, you are committing a crime. I suggest that you and others visit youtube.com and listen to what Acting Director Thomas Homan has to say about the entire issue, it is his job to know about immigration, and customs enforcement. This is Mr. Homan's official title: Executive Associate Director of ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations.

 

So you'd prosecute a 3 year old for snatching a candy bar off the rack at the grocery store? It's the law you know.