What did Obama know? That’s new focus of probe into anti-Trump dossier

It's now Obama time.

What did Obama know, when did Obama know it and why didn't Obama do a damn thing ?

Why would Susan Rice email herself using a government computer and a .gov email account on January 20th, 2017 after 12:30 pm when she was no longer employed by the Obama White House ? Misuse of government property ? Susan Rice emailing herself after a meeting that took place in the White House on January 5th, 2017, "Go by the book."

Kinda looks like Obama is going to have to lawyer up. I wonder if Obama knows any good attorneys ?

Susan Rice, Valerie Jarrett, Sally Yates, Loretta Lynch, are all going to have to lawyer up.

All should be required to turn over their passports.

Comey, Brennan and Clapper already have lawyers. Which one will throw Obama under the bus ?

 

There are multiple documents which constitute the President's Daily Brief and they're all recorded and archived.

A good place to look to begin to understand the role the White House played would be to examine those documents.

That is ...unless some of them have already been destroyed or "lost".

 

Chicago politics, of course obama knew.

 

It is just a matter of time before obama gets exposed as the POS he is.

 

Suspicious.

 

There is talk that the only reason Hillary isn't in jail is because it would lead back to Obama.

Its pretty apparent he knew. He also knew about Hillary-he emailed her secret, illegal account.

 

"Like with a cloth or something ?"



Wikileaks already revealed that President Obama and his White House staff all had g-mail accounts and used anonymous names.

 

Here's what I find funny about the Corruption Probe: That these idiots really didn't think it'd remain in the system. Of course it would, once you work for the government you are monitored BY the government and at any time, any government worker(like Nunes) can peek into whatever he wants at his classified level.

Not only has this been a grand show of corruption, but mind boggling stupidity. To think they could submit a false document to the Courts to get a warrant and not have it investigated later on.

 

They didn't know, or more likely didnt care-she was going to win and who would reveal it?

Thats how dems do.

 

Then she lost PA and the Blue Wall of hypocrisy collapsed like the weak pile of cards it is.

 

I think its going to be one of the worst types of uphill battles.

With regards to Obama's involvement there are two things; 1) knowing about the FISA activities, 2) knowing the scam that produced the evidence used in FISA (the dossier).

The first was already established by Susan Rice when she emailed herself that cover-your-ass note on her last day at work where she claimed the President wanted things done by the book.

So substantiating that with a review of the President's daily security briefings or by questioning the people who assembled them should be a simple easy matter.

But digging into the second; how much did Obama know about the corrupt activities surrounding the dossier ..well that's going to be extremely difficult because of how well the President is insulated.

My guess is he knew - but we'd need to prove that.

Obviously his closest advisers in the FBI, DOJ, and state Department knew, as well the Hillary Campaign, its lawyers, and the go-between's with Steele and the Russian agents they used.

 

I guess Hillary has proven to be an insufficient distraction? Time to try obama? Lll

 

Its the digital age. He's not so insulated.

 

Susan Rice emailed herself 15 days after the meeting where she said Obama wanted it done by the book.

Kinda looks like some covering up asses crap.

Who emails themselves an email ?

 

distraction from what?

 

When HDS (Hilary Derangement Syndrome) won't do, the obsessed RW Tinfoil Hats turn to ODS (Obama Derangement Syndrome).

And the Truly COMICAL thing is THIS:

Some of them think that people actually exist that actually take their DEFLECTIVE BS seriously.

"But...Clinton...But...Obama..."

And the LAUGHS keep coming (courtesy of the RW).

 

I'm laughing so hard right now, and its cause of you AJ.

 

But there is a problem when the people responsible for creating the records are...

...the same ones who are entrusted with maintaining their integrity...
...the same ones who can destroy them...
...the same ones who get to manufacture and then validate the reason as to why they were lost.

 

People who want to manufacture a record of something.

 

From what I understand it's not uncommon for some to use their email accounts for storage of files. etc and email themselves.

Not really a safe place to store information, emails or information unless you want someone else to see them.

That's where the DNC screwed up bigly, they stored all emails that were sent or received and got hacked. The RNC has a policy of deleting most emails on their email servers after so many months so when the RNC email server was hacked...there was nothing there showing corruption or criminality.

Susan Rice attends a meeting in the Obama White House on November 5th 2017. If we take the word of Susan Rice a known liar, President Obama said "Do it by the book." Do what by the book ? In reference to the "resistance" to take down President elect Trump ???

15 days later after Donald Trump takes the oath of office, Susan Rice returns to the White House no longer a government employee, uses a government computer to sends herself an email to her g-mail account or her former .gov email account (?) that says that President Obama said "Do it by the book."

By 12:30 pm EST that White House .gov email account was no longer Susan Rice's .gov email account.

Did President Obama really say "Do it by the book." We only have Susan Rice the official Obama White House liar word and an email she sent to herself if Obama really said it.

Why would Susan Rice wait 15 days before sending herself that email ???

Kinda looks like Rice was trying to cover Obama and her own ass just in case what was really going on gets exposed.

Remember that Wikileakes exposed that President Obama using an anomalous user name and most on the Obama White House staff had g-mail accounts and were using those g-mail accounts while conducting official government business to hide what was really going on in the Obama White House. The least transparency of any Presidential administration.

 

Devin Nunes...

Can't wait to see his mugshot.

 

Or secreted over to Obama's presidential library where no one can get at them now:

Susan Rice Unmasking Docs Sealed in Obama Presidential Library for Next 5 Years

No doubt, Obama & Co. are hoping Trump and any prying eyes will be gone by 2022...

 

Those are questions which beg to be answered, given that not many people can trust their own gov't anymore. And this distrust is driven by the facts of gov't lying to its own citizens. Distrust has a cause in this cause effect universe.

I sure do not know the truth here, but of course I want to know it. All one has to do is to ask a simple question. Are politicians capable of graft and corruption, usurping our now dead republic? If the answer is yes, and if the democrats believed hillary could not lose, and no such investigation would ever happen, which of course must be somewhat true, IMO, then of course this is an issue that demands investigation. By objective people, if you can find one in DC today.

And we need to know, for sure, what was meant by that mention of an "insurance policy". If we had a free press and genuine journalism, we would have top investigative reporters on this like stink on feces and white on rice. That we lack that is an indictment against our so called free press, MSM. And it really does evidence that the free press does not exist in so far as major corporate owned media, owned by 6 huge corporations who have their own self interests. And that self interest does not include a free press and journalistic integrity nor standards which real journalism would demand.

 

Was it stupidity or arrogance?

I'm inclined to think it was their arrogance that led to their stupidity.

"Hillary in a landslide!"

"Oh, sh*t!"

 

FBI: No, We Will Not Turn Over Information About Secret Meetings Between Barack Obama and James Comey Because The Liberal Media Isn't Super-Interested In It

Oh -- the liberal media isn't interested in it, therefore, you can invoke part of the FOIA law that says you don't have to expedite a FOIA request.

So the liberal media gets to determine whether non-liberal media organizations are entitled to FOIA, huh? Swell.

The FBI states it will not expedite the release of documents about secret meetings between FBI Director James Comey and former President Barack Obama, according to a letter the bureau sent to The Daily Caller News Foundation.
Such information is not "a matter of widespread and exceptional media interest in which there exists possible questions about the government’s integrity which affects public confidence," David Hardy, the section chief for the bureau's Record/Information Dissemination Section, told TheDCNF in a Feb. 26 letter.

TheDCNF, under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), requested records of all meetings between Comey and Obama and sought an "expedited process" as provided under the act when issues are of great interest to the media and the records address issues pertaining to government integrity. TheDCNF FOIA request was filed Feb. 16, 2018.

The issue prompting the FOIA request was the disclosure Comey held a secret Oval Office meeting with Obama on Jan. 5, 2017. Comey never divulged the meeting to Congress.

Susan Rice, Obama’s national security adviser, former deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, and former Vice President Joe Biden also attended the meeting.

This is the meeting that prompted Susan Rice to write an email to herself claiming Obama had told her to do everything "by the book" -- including concealing the existence of the probe from the soon-to-be Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States.

No, that doesn't raise questions about the integrity of the FBI at all.