The atheist gods of 'Lack', the only true religion?

I have seen the Sun too, and I can say there is plenty of evidence that it is not a God

so your agnostic on if the Sun is a God or not... interesting

 

First an insult and then off to lick your wounds. Pathetic.

 

right, but you still either believe in a God or you don't, until one believes in one of the many God, they still don't believe in any Gods

Christians for example only disbelieve in one less God then Atheists

 

maybe they are maybe they arent, you have not proven it so I have no reason to believe it

 

I have no obligation to respond to a post 10 seconds after its posted, I said I will get back to it, nothing like proving beyond a shadow of doubt your arguments are so weak you have nothing.

 

Thanks. You just did!

 

but that is a faulty premise you know.

theists believe in the 'existence' of God.
atheists disbelieve in the 'existence' of God.

theists believe in God x or y or z.
atheists disbelieve in all God(s).

you can believe that G/god(s) exist but not believe in any particular God


Theists are described by the belief Gods exist.
Atheists are described by the belief no Gods exist.

 

They are or aren't what? And what is they? Are you claiming that fictional creatures aren't fictional or that they aren't invented.

 

But then you have to define god.

 

Not me.

he has to define God, I pointed out his false premise where he made the mistake of stating believe in God with a conclusion that belief in God is the same as belief in the existence of a God, 2 completely different premises.

As I said, Once again:

but that is a faulty premise you know.

theists believe in the 'existence' of God.
atheists disbelieve the 'existence' of God.

theists believe in God x or y or z.
atheists cannot believe in any God(s) since they do not believe any exist.

you can believe that G/god(s) exist but not believe in any particular God which is why the only appropriate definition for atheist is one who believes God does not exist.

please read for comprehension

 

They wrote songs about this you know?

 

no,
Theist believe in a God, Atheist Don't believe in a God
Stamp collectors collect Stamps, those that

so you believe God's exist, you just have not decided which one you want to believe in yet, that is not really agnostic

we know you know the Christian bible as you quote it, so guessing that one is out of the running, hope you find what your looking for some day

 

but that is not what defines an atheist, what distinguishes an atheist from a theist is theists belief in the 'existence' of God, atheists believe no God exists.

 

your confused, Atheist do not believe in a God, Theist believe in God

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/atheist

" a person who does not believe in the existence of a god or any gods"

the minute you believe in a God or God(s) you are a Theist

 

That was a pretty lame copout.

You have been thoroughly refuted. You have repeatedly posted material that you didn't understand, and which undermined your own points.

Just admit -- like a big boy -- that the thread topic is merely your opinion. We can decide for ourselves that it is horseshit, and we have. It is.

 

Haha, exhibit W. This precisely the logic of an atheist. You just can't stop shooting yourself in the foot...that's what being a rabid zealot defending an indefensible idea will do to you....

 

An interesting point because, you raise the

I lack belief, I am an atheist.

 

thats why the lacker theory is so ****ed up because neither do I disbelieve in God.

Ice is H2o therefore all H2o is ice!

atheologists are trying to take a neutral position and force it into atheoville since it can be equally said that I lack disbelief in God and therefore mean the exact opposite that I am a theist at the same time.
I find that abstract concepts like understanding a neutral position is outside the atheologists ability to comprehend.

I lack disbelief

for that matter I lack lack

 

if you do not believe in a God... your an Artiest

 

Neither do I disbelieve, your conclusion is 'made with a 1/2 a deck'.

Which is as foolish as saying it isnt possible for H2o to be a vapor because its ice right now.

 

you do not believe in a God, that is all it takes to be an Athiest

 

according to the neo atheists that not only myself but stanford school pf philosophy as debunked.

You cant simply use one condition where 2 are required and claim its one. that is a composition fallacy.

 

according to the dictionary definition of Atheist, that would make you an Atheist

your logic is like a Theist that is Christian saying no one else is a theist unless they believe the same as they do, which is not true, a theist is anyone that believe in any god

likewise if one doesn't believe in a god, they are a Atheist by definition

 

you either believe or you don't, if you believe your a theist, if you don't your an Artiest, saying you might believe in the future doesn't change that

 

way over simplified

Can you explain what the difference is between the following:

I believe in God
I disbelieve in God
I lack belief in God

It appears you cant but for the benefit of a doubt.