DOJ releases the FISA applications, confirms Dossier was among primary sources

Sorry, but you don't get to make that decision. The judges on the FISA Court do.

 

LOL, this isn't about Trump. This was THE allegations for months, years for that matter. And Rosenstein has flatly denied them. And yet, we're still dogged by them, even as we have dubious activity in a court of law. And investigating said dubious activity, calling it out as dubious activity is deemed to be hearsay, or being a Trumpkin.

I'll be very blunt: We are never going to let the charges down. The left/people in the media claimed that Russian collusion was a thing. You claimed that the people who participated in the voting process was manipulated by the Russians, etc.

We want this proven, we demand for it to be proven and I'm not going to stop beating the dead horse until its proven.

 

lol @ the 4th amendment

I bet you don't mind the Patriot Act and all of that warrant-less wiretapping and surveillance when you think its being done against "those other people"

 

I don't think they made any conscious decision. That much is readily apparent in the consistency of the four applications. I wanna take a damn good bet that even the redacted info is the same on all four pages.

 

Actually I did/do, but carry on.

 

Its ok -- as you probably had to do as a former bush supporter -- you will have your chance to pretend you were not really a "trumpkin" in the future -- and I find it funny that despite all of the indictments, convictions, bipartisan Senate reports, Inspector General reports -- all of them say Russia interfered with the elections --- but none say that vote counts were changed due to Russians hacking voting machines -- if you see anyone saying that happened, they are lying...

I just find it funny that you folks are banging the drums for Obama to be arrested when there is ZERO evidence --- especially in comparison to the evidence against Trump -- it is very hard to be a partisan hack for a guy like Trump

 

No, I don't believe that at all....I believe you bought all of the fear mongering from the conservative media back then in the same way you buy the fear mongering now.....you have failed to show any capability of objective analysis.

 

BOOOOOOOM!!!!!!

 

You should read the warrants again then. It clearly states that Steele and the dossier were not used as sources because of the political nature of their origin and direct attempts to discredit "Candidate #!" AKA Trump.

 

No, it does not clearly state this, and you can't quote or name a section where it does either.

 

You won't be satisfied when it is proven.

You're going to cling to Trump and go right down with the Trumpster ship.

 

You get very far down in the document before it is even mentioned. Not only that, but contrary to another false Trumpster claim, no attempt was made to conceal, omit or minimize the fact that the "dossier" was opposition research.

 

That's correct. You not having any evidence to back up your lunatic claims is what makes them all conspiracy theories.

That was unsupported speculation about a red herring. And it's the best you have. Conspiracy theory.

I can't even follow your conspiracy yammering. It makes no sense to anybody outside of your cult.

It's SOP. You're flailing helplessly.

And you're back to your "the Republican judges are morons!" theory.

No, you're just peddling BS because you don't want to admit you've allowed yourself to be used as a rube for years. And this conspiracy is going to crater like every other one of your conspiracy theories. Heck, it already cratered, when the document was released.

 

Oh, to the contrary. It's easy to impeach a manchurian candidate(on that note, why allow him to be POTUS for 2 years? Why allow him to be elected at all?) It's much harder to drain this swamp of contemptible, lying bastards.

 

Give me a page number where they claim they don't use Steele or the Dossier as a source. We'll compare this claim to what's actually written.

 

I rarely use the ignore feature. You're the second person to make the list, congratulations. I can't deal with people who can't have a factual, decent conversation.

 

LOL....And who is that reliable intelligence asset, pray tell?
And I claim the Steele dossier is uncorroborated because who is standing up to lend credence to what Steele says?

Some anonymous Russians? Very impressive.

 

And every attempt was made to minimize the fact that it was opposition research. Those words, and other key words are not used in the application. Rather, it is "suspected"(ROFL) that they wanted to "damage" candidate 1. The very use of the word "suspect", when you know for a FACT is fraud.

The footnote is a lie, in court. Just that alone. Just that alone, validates the claims to be prosecuted in law. They lied.

 

CNN says Page was under surveillance
since 2014( http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/03/r...illance-much-earlier-than-previously-thought/) .Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_Page .
And in September of 2016 the government investigated Page.

So the idea that Page was only investigated after he left the Trump campaign is nonsense and unsupported.

Have you actually thought through your comments?

 

Non sequitur and desperate moving of the goal posts.........you conflated two separate issues and now throw in the 2014 FISA ( which ended b4 the Trump campaign BTW) to cover your faux pas.......well, that was easy to expose. Carry on.....

 

I find your posts so ridiculous I'll even take CNN's word over yours, not to mention Daily Caller's.

 

Trump clearly destroyed the pee tape myth when he said people told him he didn't stay in Moscow overnight.


Wait.

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...rs-alone-with-putin-still-rattling-washington Even Bloomberg had to admit, he really didn't spend the whole night. Of course, none of that confirms whether peepee tape actually happened or not. But hey, it "could have"

 

Spam? Hardly.

My comment was meant to highlight the intractable willful ignorance of entrenched ideology.

And provide you with some knowledge you either were totally unaware of or seem to have totally forgotten in the first place. But I get how consciously working on ones intellect is a foreign concept to those suffering from fully extent confirmation bias.

As to reporting me, I do find it amusing that so many on the far right are such snowflakes. I guess they just like to project all the time.

 

If it’s not legit then why’d the trump admin redact half of it?