The atheist gods of 'Lack', the only true religion?

Because nothing can be proven to not exist unless it's a tautology. So it's a meaningless bar. but you will never address it, even though you brought it up. THAT'S the squirming.

Now, you can 1) admit that this argument you posted is dumb and meaningless or 2) offer any logical counter argument, THEN maybe we can move on to rocks. OR, you can keep trying to change the subject to rocks which is the same thing as 1).

And even if you did suddenly start debating in good faith, the fact that it's been well over 40 pages of pulling teeth to get you to even address the failure in your argument means that you are not using logic, not debating in good faith, not convinced of your own position, not doing anything other than shouting emotions.

 

Yeah, I thought so.

 

Again take the baton from swensson; prove that rocks can disbelieve.




take your time!


Looks like you need more time? Sure!

 

So, you admit the above is a meaningless argument that you withdraw?

 

are you kidding me?

Again take the baton from swensson; prove that rocks can disbelieve.

This is the goofiest **** anyone could ever dream to get their hands on!

Why would I withdraw some of the best torpedo's that sunk atheology that one could imagine?

 

Because you can't respond to a simple undeniable refutation of that 'torpedo.' Therefore, you have lost this debate. You don't have any arguments left.

 

Oh you need more time huh

Again take the baton from swensson; prove that rocks can disbelieve.

since you failed to respond I guess I won.

 

Ok lol, let's watch you squirm from your squirm:
It can't be proven that a rock doesn't believe, but since there is no evidence that a rock believes, the only logical conclusion is that it doesn't.
Now, your turn.

 

ok so you agree that a rock is capable of performing the action of disbelieving. This just keeps getting better all the time!

 

Ok, except you refused (for the 197th time) to respond to the problem with the fundamental argument on which that entire argument rests. Which means you have no response, because you are wrong. Unless THIS time, you have logical response? (lololololololol)

 

Ultimately, calling yourself an 'agnostic' and then continually presenting theistic argument from the theistic playbook will always look like a duck pretending to be a beaver.

 

Oh, it's all nonsense and he knows it (at least on some level), that's why he won't really discuss it in any real way. But, I have a ton of time to kill, and he is the only one that 'responds' such as his responses are.

 

You arent discussing anything you are claiming nothing is real, wtf kind of discussion is that ffs

well thats 2 of you that degenerated and back pedaled your arguments to a point of loonacy. You claiming that nothing can be proven as a premise for the ignorant faith based questions you demand I answer and now both of you think rocks are capable of doing things. Sorry but you people are way too far over the edge to engage in arguments based in reason with logical proofs which is what I have been trying to foster here.

So did your rock have a nice conversation with you today? How do you know you are real?

They used to put people that talked like that in rubber rooms you know?

 

Lol, Ohhh I had forgotten your argument that you are an atheist.

 

Lol, 700 pages later, and you still haven't even tried to respond to the proof that your entire argument is completely flawed.

 

Let's break down the logic here:

Complete non-sequitur.

This is more of a strawman

This is a strawman

This is just a blatant lie.

Appeal to ridicule

Obviously, I don't

Ad homonym

 

you dont know you are real and you think you are capable of conducting anything that approaches a reasonable argument....NOT, hell even your attempt at calling out fallacies is completely made up bullshit.

after claiming a rock can freely act you double back and paint it as ridicule, like I said there is no possible way for anyone to have anything facsimile of a reasonable conversation with you after your arguments are debunked.

 

Thats the problem you think your strawman is proof, I laugh.

 

You cant even get that right, try agnostic!

Thiests are not trying to hijack the good name of agnostic like the desperate neo atheists so I dont have too much to say to them, and clearly you have no clue what a theist argument looks like

But just for the sake of demonstrating neo atheist loonacy......

I lack disbelief, Im a theist!

There!
Not only did I wipe out the excluded middle the neoatheists are trying to hijack I wiped out weak-atheists as well, and sucked them all into theistville!!

and for those who dont read well between the lines, that includes all atheists who do not claim to disbelieve, they are all theists now, because anyone who lacks disbelief is clearly a theist.

 

Lol, if it were a strawman, you could explain how it is a strawman, and more importantly, you could explain in a logical manner how it's wrong.

 

That's not what you said.

 

you think rolling the dice and play games of chance are legitimate, well they arent, they dont even apply. its laughable

I have never claimed to ba anything but agnostic. caveat: aside from being facetious to demonstrate how foolish lackerism is

 

Lol, ok, first of all, that has nothing to do with what we are even talking about. Second of all, are you saying probability doesn't exist?

 

Well, you aren't able to understand how you said it, but you said it. And the agnostic part is a lie.

 

bullshit, you are making **** up again, thats the best you people can do, total desperation!

I am laughing because you say nothing exists outside your little probability box