Thats what happens when the people actually listen to him, instead of the lies spewed forth from the Clinton News Network and MSNAACP
If you've hired someone to do a job and they are only doing it 50% of the time, I'd say they were not a good employee and should be fired.
That's it huh. His biggest night of the year just a few days ago, and he barely musters even. Not surprising given the ignorance he portrays.
It's hard to make an impression when you have been tweeting your guts out for a month before the speech. No new material.
Could be the others are wrong! You wouldn't know one way or the other since there is NO VERIFIABLE TEST until the 2020 election day. Get a grip. Steve
Incumbents are more inclined to stay static as they have a track record to display. The FARM BILL, for example, is like gold in a bank vault. The farmers in the Midwest last Summer planted way more corn than soybeans. They were in tune to what advice Sonny Purdue was giving them and it paid off. They won't forget what Trump has done for them when they vote in 2020. I'm betting that Trump will win about 318 electoral votes in 2020.
Do you have a cell phone handy? If so, call someone who agrees with you. Perhaps Hillary Clinton, Jeb Bush or John Kasich might be available.
He gives himself an A+ too. Which is just about as credible as a Rasmussen poll! (Razzy had to work especially hard to manufacture that result!)
If polls were an accurate measure of public sentiment, why are there always such wide differences in the results? Confirmation bias is a profitable thing to exploit for many "news" organizations....
I have always believed that the real Trump core base iis arround 25%, the same level as the "Bush dead enders" and the Tea Party, once the DC Republcians left all the "grass roots" hanging. The reason I believe that, is that the reactionary right wing rallying points tend to settle around that number once the noise dies down. And I have no doubt that the "Bush dead enders" the tea partiers and the Trumpsters are all exactly the same people. One only wonders what the right wing noise machine will invent next to con them with.
Trump worshippers are dumb in evoking public opinion. Their surgically cherry-picking polls just emphasizes their deceit. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/president_trump_job_approval-6179.html https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/?ex_cid=rrpromo
It's what they do. The ex disc jockeys that bellow at them out of their AM radios every day, have been telling them that they are the "silent majority" for two decades. Trump and Fox Noise tell them that, too. And they're desperate to believe it. So, there was a whole meme about how well Trump's SOTU was recieved.
You keep ignoring my posts throughout this thread. Anyone that believes an OPINION POLL or combination of polls more than a year before an election is engaged in wishful thinking, and not engaged in critical thinking. The OP has stated her reasons. YOU people are the ones that insisted "Hillary in a landslide" long before the 2016 election. The only reason pollsters lied before their LAST POLLS was to discourage Trump voters from voting. That's an attempt to brainwash people. See the difference? Steve
Their selectivity in public surveys evokes the story of the doting mother who boasted to the surrounding throng seeing the troops march off to war, "Will you just look at that now! They're all out of step but my Johnny!"
LOL, you can't handle the truth is the problem here. For all others in PF, TRUTH gets under the skin of these people! Steve
asking a thousand targeted peeps in a targeted locale to respond to vague yet leading questions & then applying that to 321 million... brainwashing, misleading bunk... these are the true colluders of election rigging, the rest is merely misdirection
The highlight was when the clown prince bragged that he had the biggest inaugural crowd ever, which was an obvious lie, and they defended the lie and parroted everything Trump said, even though it was blatantly false!