Trump doesn't have any friends.. He's abused everyone that has dealt with him since the 1980s. Impeach him and march him out of DC leading a parade.. He loves parades and pageantry.
You could likely settle the national debt by having bidding for the right to escort Trump out of the white house.
That's it exactly, but instead they'll be making claims, without evidence, that it was the EU who wanted it and Biden was only carrying out their bidding..
Yes indeed questioning the right for a black man to move into the white house as president seem a lot of fun as if we was living in the era where the SC had just rule in 1857 that no black person could be a citizen. Making America great where Jefferson for example who was our first president to move into the white house could have a black mistress but that was as far as it could go.
Wow! Democrats really go into a downward spiral when the facts don't match their beliefs! And when they segue to the Democratic policies of yesteryear makes it ironic as well as amusing.
That is a NON-REPLY to my stated fact the PRESIDENT TRUMP is the duly-elected PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and has broad powers under the Constitution. I do agree that the birther idea was wrong; but that was long for Trump was elected president and he was ELECTED president. If that is the best/worst you have against PRESIDENT TRUMP, be prepared to see him in the White House 2021-2025. If you, your internet gurus and those who lay their feet have real complaints and not manufactured ones, lay them out one-by-one.
Bringing up the idea that if he is thrown out of office by the congress using their constitutional powers we could have a civil war? Johnson right after our civil was, Nixon, Clinton none of them threaten to call for a civil war over their facing impeachment.
Trump didn't call for a civil war either. the statement was that impeaching him would bring about a civil war like division of the population and it was correct. We are already so divided we can't agree on any political issue that doesn't crush our opposition. A successful impeachment would be a disaster but we are hell bent to git'er done.
I'd say the Leftist with a scowl on their face are very ugly. Your point is that it must be because she is Black?
I think we're long, long, long, long beyond the point where Trump acted remotely interested in being President. (I think that was when he was obliged the take the oath of office.) After that it quickly became apparent that Trump was, and is, not all interested in anything that reeks like politics or upholding rule of law. After all, Trump only ran for President to escape imprisonment for tax evasion... Some tax-avoiders flee the country, others jump from a high floor. Again others put on a fake tan and wear a blond wig to avoided detection... But THIS this arrogant, corrupted pig tried to seek shelter in the White House(!) so Presidential immunity would prevent from him being arrested. And, low an behold, he got there but I doubt his election was achieved anything but legally fair. And that is where we still are today, three years of golf, and 10.000 rants about fake news later. But even Trump can't, and won't, keep up this charade of being interested in winning a an election or pretending to practice politics while really sleeping late into the afternoon every day. I think he's long, long, long past the point where he gives a damn about whether he wins a re-election or not. It's nothing more than keeping up a thin layer of appearances. He's gonna try and stay on as President even if he loses. Regardless of the constitutional crisis he will unleash. Because for Trump NOT staying President means a one-way ticket to jail and being butt-fuc*ed on cell-block D. He's so obviously guilty of tax avoidance the case against him is won before it's even begun. Plain and simple. We can have our di*k hanging out of our pants discussing on this forum whether that's true or not. But Trump... is what's known as a Granada. So he HAS to stay President, by any means necessary. The fate of democracy will be the least of his concern. Fate of a prison-term so much more...
No, but your response that everything goes back to race is what the Democrats are all about, ever since their establishment in 1828 in order to uphold slavery.
Thats nonsense and has nothing to do with the definition os terrorism. Its a random definition useful for the US to cover and have an apology for diverse war crimes, in which they used or at least supported terrorism. Terror is spreading fear through violence for political aims and completely independent from the question of the victim and/or the perpetrator lives in a Democracy. Of course e.g. Al Quaeda or the IS used terror against numerous regimes that were/are not even close to a Western Democracy. Nelson Mandela clearly matches the very definition. That he acted in the interest of Uncle Sam who wanted to take down South Africa does not change the fact in the slightest.
