Climate Change: You can deny, but you can't hide.

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Natty Bumpo, Feb 22, 2020.

  1. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,619
    Likes Received:
    15,000
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your pissy ad hominems aside, can you distinguish which, based upon the exact same data, is based upon the science?


    [​IMG]
    "We expect we will see community spread in this country.
    It's not so much a question of if this will happen anymore,
    but rather more a question of exactly when this will happen
    and how many people in this country will have severe illness."
    February 25, 2020

    Dr. Nancy Messonnier
    Director of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases

    OR

    [​IMG]
    It's “under control!” a “problem that’s going to go away!”
    “We have very few people with it" and the people are getting better,

    they’re all getting better!”
    February 25, 2020

    Donald John Trump

     
    Last edited: Apr 1, 2020
  2. Facts-602

    Facts-602 Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2020
    Messages:
    1,281
    Likes Received:
    963
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nice change of subject.
     
    Bondo likes this.
  3. Natty Bumpo

    Natty Bumpo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    41,619
    Likes Received:
    15,000
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Your avoidance notwithstanding, Dr Messonier's statement is the one based upon science; the other one is consummate balderdash.
     
  4. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yes. my citation says exactly what I told you it said, as you are fully aware.
     
  5. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    all of this has been proven false.
     
  6. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,908
    Likes Received:
    3,135
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As usual, you only make false claims, and offer no facts or logic that actually support them.
     
    Bondo likes this.
  7. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,908
    Likes Received:
    3,135
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, it did not, as you know I already proved. You now it only talked about a consensus of "studies" by a few dozen pal-reviewing climate "scientists," and the success of a handful or political operatives who were able to cajole scientific organizations into issuing statements that their members neither agreed with nor were even consulted about. You offered no support for your claim that the majority of scientists disagree with me, nor will you ever be doing so.
     
  8. ChristopherABrown

    ChristopherABrown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    5,149
    Likes Received:
    175
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Lol, wow, your grasp of science is impressive.
     
  9. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,253
    Likes Received:
    5,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Try me.
     
  10. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,253
    Likes Received:
    5,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Glad you finally realized that. Far superior to most republicans.
     
  11. ChristopherABrown

    ChristopherABrown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    5,149
    Likes Received:
    175
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Done.

    You failed.
     
  12. ChristopherABrown

    ChristopherABrown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    5,149
    Likes Received:
    175
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Ummm accountability must be presented and is not. You fail.
     
  13. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,253
    Likes Received:
    5,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trumpstilskins don’t even believe in science. Where’s the accountability there ?
     
  14. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,253
    Likes Received:
    5,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Chicken a la king.
     
  15. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,541
    Likes Received:
    4,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    CFC's cannot destroy the ozone layer. We couldn't destroy the ozone layer even if we wanted to. As long as there is sunlight and oxygen, there WILL be an ozone layer.

    I bet you were panicking about the "super huge" ozone hole in the Arctic earlier this year. Guess what, that hole is now gone. Guess why? The sunlight came back again. The "ozone hole" at the poles is a naturally occurring phenomenon, and it naturally goes away when Spring comes around. Notice that no one is talking about the south pole right now? That's because it is Summer/Fall there. That talk will start up again in a few months when Winter returns there and sunlight goes away. Rinse, wash, repeat.
     
  16. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,541
    Likes Received:
    4,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How does climate "change" exactly? Is there more climate now than there was thirty years ago?

    Climate is a subjective term for prevailing weather conditions at a particular location at a particular point in time. ("dry climate", "arid climate", "tropical climate", etc.) Climate is not a quantifiable term. There is no such thing as "a lot of climate" or "very little climate". There is just 'climate'. It doesn't change. What gets called a "desert climate" will always be called a "desert climate", even if the prevailing weather conditions at a particular location changes.
     
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2020
  17. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,253
    Likes Received:
    5,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    https://www.pca.state.mn.us/air/chlorofluorocarbons-cfcs-and-hydrofluorocarbons-hfcs

    Here is just one state government that says you’re wrong. Now it’s your turn to supply a reference we can believe, that says otherwise.
     
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2020
  18. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,541
    Likes Received:
    4,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    False Authority Fallacy. A state government is not science.

    I don't play "holy link" wars. I have already told you how ozone is formed. All that is necessary is sunlight and oxygen.
     
  19. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,253
    Likes Received:
    5,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong. They agree not only with the university science departments in Minnesota but every university in the entire world.
    Where is your reference ? Where do you get your so called science from that says the ozone layer depletion is a fraud ?
     
  20. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,253
    Likes Received:
    5,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You’re a scientist ? You know more then every university in the world...starting with Minnesota ?
    How about Johns Hopkins. Just 3400 more to go.
    https://muse.jhu.edu/book/4973

    just name one source, other then your little red herring of...” how the ozone layer was formed.....”
     
    Last edited: Apr 29, 2020
  21. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,541
    Likes Received:
    4,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    randU Fallacy.
    False Authority Fallacy.
    Appeal to Popularity Fallacy.

    Universities are not science, either.

    Science itself.

    The Church of the Ozone Hole is a fraud. Here's why:

    The ozone layer is what protects us from very harmful UV-C sunlight. Ozone (O3) will absorb that light, and in the process, that ozone gets destroyed and becomes oxygen (O2). UV-B sunlight mostly gets absorbed by oxygen, and in the process, that oxygen gets destroyed and becomes ozone. Some of that light does reach the surface, however, and we can get sunburned from it. UV-A can also be absorbed by oxygen, but most of it reaches the surface. It will typically tan one's skin, if not slightly burn it.

    Thus, so long as there is sunlight and oxygen in the atmosphere, there WILL DEFINITELY be ozone in the upper atmosphere. Take away one or the other, and there will no longer be ozone. That is why you see "ozone holes" at the poles during their respective winters. Weather patterns can affect the size of such holes (it made the recent "ozone hole" in the Arctic rather large this year), but once sunlight returns, the hole goes away again, as you've now seen (that particular hole is no longer there). That is because winter is over at the north pole, and it is now spring, and sunlight has returned there.

    In the upcoming months, once the south pole enters into winter and there's no sunlight there, people will start freaking out about the "ozone hole" at the south pole again. But, once sunlight returns down there, that hole will disappear again, all the same.

    Rinse, wash, repeat.


    So, you can either keep falling for their lies, or else you can educate yourself on the topic. That decision is for you to make.
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2020
    ricmortis likes this.
  22. gfm7175

    gfm7175 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    9,541
    Likes Received:
    4,850
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I know more than they do about ozone holes, definitely...
     
  23. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,253
    Likes Received:
    5,940
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sure you do. And you know more then MIT and Cal Tech too.
    Am still waiting for ANY reference that backs you up.
     
  24. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Which irrefutable science, the science you agree with or the science you don't?
     
  25. dagosa

    dagosa Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2010
    Messages:
    22,253
    Likes Received:
    5,940
    Trophy Points:
    113

    You’re saying the science from every government agency is a lie along with every university and NASA ? Pretty bold talk from a person with no reference. Your story line is from ????
     
    Last edited: Apr 30, 2020

Share This Page