Tulsi Gabbard Proposes Plan to Ban Ballot Harvesting for 2020 Election

She does it again. Hard not to love her.

 

She has intelligence. That is why the Dems did everything to keep her down during the primaries. They don't want someone intelligent....they act too *gasp* independently! They want someone who is obedient and follows the Democrat Collective.

 

Not me.

 

The law seems reasonable. As long as everyone's vote is mailed on time, I see no issue with such restrictions. I'm not sure there's a problem that needs this solution, but it does no harm, and if it calms people's fears about mail voting, I'm for it.

Tulsi Gabbard, on the other hand, is a bonafide nutcase, IMO. Okay, that's a little extreme, but something seems off.

 

Such a nutcase that Democrats did their best to torpedo her by using Corp Google contacts to have her ad revenue from her website mysteriously shut down the hours right after the debates when she received the most traffic. There is NOTHING coincidental about that kind of BS.

The Democrat machine are SCUM and Tulsi just didn’t fit their profile. Proves just how needed she is when Democrat hate her.

 

Maybe you missed the part where I said I think she's a little off. Kinda like a reverse AOC, but old enough to know better.

I know nothing about ad revenue getting shut down. How do you shutdown ad revenue? And what does my opinion of her have to do with Democrats?

If you're just ranting, that's fine. Otherwise, I don't know what your point is.

 

The entire Tulsi vs Google lawsuit was Conspiratorial, Paranoid, Tinfoil Hat Stuff.

And, it was dismissed over 6 months ago:

https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/04/tulsi-gabbard-google-free-speech-lawsuit/

 

Thinking small or clothed gets this nowhere. Swimming pool.

 

You forgot to add dementia ridden. The dems threw this election, they had no intention of winning.

 

gtffoh.
"In a case of poor timing, Gabbard’s account was suspended for an interval of time following the first presidential debate as viewers sought information about the unfamiliar candidate."
"After the incident, a Google representative explained that the platform automatically flagged Gabbard’s account for unusual activity, a mistake it corrected a short time later."

Just a case of poor timing. Riiiiight.

Now Google is a private corporation, they can do what they want, but as far as tin foil hat theories go this one is pretty plausible.

 

Google are shameless propagandists.

 

She doesn't come off that way to me. She single handedly kicked the sh** out of harris.

 

Too bad she was not their nominee as an independent Ibwould have considered voting for her.

 

What's the principle to which she is sticky in support ballot harvesting and opening our elections to fraud?

 

Same, although her communist positions would have made it hard to justify.

 

This.

She may be the least crazy of the Democrat Marxists, but she's still a Marxist.

 

Perhaps, but I'm talking about her. Something seems off. Just my opinion.

 

If you don't know that Google did that,then how can you say she's 'a little off'? You don't know enough about her to make that judgement.

 

Yes she did,and that will surely be in some ads against KH,along with her laughing about putting people in jail for weed.

 

I don't need to know what Google did to form an opinion of Gabbard. I know of her what she's shown me. I don't need to get to know her any better. Maybe I'm wrong, and if she runs again, I'll give her another look, but right now, I'm not impressed.

 

Yeah. BUT, she can speak in complete sentences, articulate her positions, knows what state she's in, what year it is, and she's not a complete dbag. These are boxes neither trump nor biden can check.

 

ok, but she is without a doubt the most impressive Democrat out of the field. The DNC is just vindictive and holding a grudge over her endorsement of Bernie over HRC. That's it in a nutshell.

 

She's 39. Far too young, IMO. I'm of the opposite opinion than most. I think the age limit should be raised. Give her ten years.

If by "impressive" you mean the best choice, I disagree 100%. I, like all other red-blooded American males, was impressed by her looks. She is pretty hot. Then again, so are AOC and Crystal Ball. Must be something in the genes of progressives, eh? And therein lies the rub. What kind of progressive obsesses over the words "radical Islamic terrorism?" And why would someone who claims to be for peace want to use that phrase in the first place? I don't see any coherence in her message. It's all over the map, and just the way she speaks does not sound authentic to me.

 

I had to go back and figure out who "her/she" was that we were referring to. lol

What did google do? I'm asking because I genuinely don't know what exactly you are referring to. Do you mean that the media has created this false perception that republicans view her in a positive light or was there another point you were making? Maybe this particular discussion isn't worth pursuing but I did want to respond to your post since you quoted mine.

 

And for all her merits, the DNC kneecapped her.