The NY-22 house district race took a unexpected turn as the Republican Claudia Tenney leading with 28,000 votes suddenly found herself trailing by 12-13 votes after a judge found enough rejected ballots to put his stamp of aproval on. Is this not against the law? So Democrats can just add ballots now if they are trailing? They did it to Trump and they are doing it to other Republicans. This is wrong. Tenney should sue or seek legal action. 28,000 vote lead is hard to overcome so the Democrats have to use rejected ballots to win. Anthony Brindisi the Democrat has taken the lead with rejected ballots. It's not over yet. Many news stories about this online. Here is Tim Pools oppinion.
Many news articles online about this. It's not just right wing bloggers. I think once ballots have been rejected they should stay rejected unless the ballots can be publicly shown and it's stated why they were brought back from the dead. Claudia was ahead by 28,000 votes. She was cheated just like Trump was. This literally just happened today.
A recent article says Tenney has taken the lead again by 12 votes in a recount with both sides asking for 24 hours to file more legal motions. Anytime a Democrat is leading the media calls the race but if it's a Republican they refuse to call or certify the results for as long as they can. I still want to know how a judge can add rejected ballots back to a race?
You support a man who wants ballots thrown out by judges and based on your rhetoric I can safely assume you would support it, so why is this any different?
Well what do those, "many articles," by credible news agencies (which are, " not...right wing bloggers") report about the judge's ruling? It is customary for a judge to explain their thinking, in their ruling (mandatory, I would think, in this type of case, in writing) just as it is to be expected from an actual news agency to include, in their report of that judge's official ruling, his or her stated rationale for their decision.
Trump wants faulty (for whatever reason) ballots thrown out. And OP wants the rejected ballots in this case to stay rejected. Sounds pretty consistent to me.
(I don't have time to watch the OP video at the moment) One could ask why those ballots were rejected in the first place? Was it Republican disenfranchisement of peoples' right to vote???
55 ballots have been magically found in a county in the NY race. It sounds like they are not sure where they came from or who they are for. Claudia Tenney leads by 12 votes and the Democrats desperately want to defeat her. First they take rejected ballots to wipe out her 28,000 vote lead putting Brindisi ahead by 13 votes and AFTER they do a recount and find Tenney back ahead by 12 votes they somehow find 55 more ballots just laying around? WTF do the Democrats think we can't see what they are doing? The cheating has to stop now!!!
To be clear, at this point, I know nothing about this case other than what you stated...so I'm just commenting on what you said. No. A judge's ruling is not "against the law". It could potentially be in error, and therefore subject to appeal. You say the judge found some rejected ballots to approve. I assume this means one of the litigants presented these rejected ballots to the judge and argued they should be accepted (correct me of I'm wrong). Why were they rejected in the first place? On what basis did the judge rule they should be allowed? These are the critical questions that determine whether or not the ruling was in error. That's not the way court proceedings work. There's no requirement to provide this to the public before a ruling is made. The information should, of course, still be made a available at some point.
The race continues. Over a week after finding 55 mystery ballots that Brindisi (D) was hoping to use and continued legal challenges Tenney (R) still held a lead of 12 votes. Now 12 ballots have been found sitting mysteriously in a dwarer. Really? The Democrats are desperate to not lose any house seats. Where does 12 ballots come from weeks after the election and recount? Tenney says it's to late and they should not be counted. Brindisi is trying to get ballots from Tenney removed through legal battles. It could end up a tie and it looks like the Democrats are still trying to steal this seat. Miller Meeks (R) in Iowa won by 6 votes after 2 recounts but Rita Hart (D) wants the House to decide the winner and still contests that race.
The key word, 'faulty'. So far, even with Ga doing 3 recounts?, The count didn't change much. But I bet faulty votes were taken out.
Democrats have issues with the election, they stay quiet, do their due diligence and make their case to their court. Contrast this with republicans who have issues with the election, cry fraud whenever a camera is on them, and get their cases thrown out in court before the ink dries.
Simple. The judge examines the case to determine whether the law was followed in the process to see whether the ballots were properly, lawfully rejected on the basis of facts with evidence in support.
I think we have all seen those on the right RANTING, SCREAMING that this election was the most fraudulent ever with abundant and widespread cheating and lies and fraud. I mean they KNOW it has been terrible! They are CERTAIN there has been HUGE fraud by democrats. It is not QUESTIONABLE!!! (they say). But they have been unable to present evidence of any widespread fraud, to such a degree that their own Republican governors of red states, their own Republican-appointed judges and SCOTUS justices and many of their own long-time republican spokesmen and campaign managers and past RNC chair and many more, have repeatedly thrown cases out of court for lack of evidence. Yet these RWers continue to rant and scream "voter fraud!!!!!" And all they can say about their Republican governors of red states, their own Republican-appointed judges and SCOTUS justices and many of their own long-time republican spokesmen and campaign managers and past RNC chair and many more who reject their claims, is that "they drank the Kool-Aid".
When putting on the tinfoil hat, make sure that all of the electronic connections are secured so that the aliens can give you the commands you need to hear from their spaceship. No, the Democrats are not stealing an election. Next time, don't spread blatant propaganda.