You don't need to do full audits. If there was widespread voter fraud, fraud would be found in sample audits because its widespread. Truml campaign was allowed to view dominion voting machines. What came of that? Dominion voting machines matches the paper ballot printout that is printed when each person votes.
RickJay: "Stupid. Idiotic. Tin foil hat." Way to engage in an intelligent debate with a fellow citizen, RickJay. Consider yourself Ignored. I tried engaging with you in conversation, but I don't put up with completely useless and foolish jabs.
They didn't think they would need as many "extra" Biden votes as they ended up needing. That's why Atlanta shut down over "a broken water pipe", which turned out to be one urinal leaking. Interestingly, 5 other cities decided that they too needed to shut down for the night at the same time as Atlanta without any sort of explanation for it. All counties in question re-started counting after observers left.
Why wouldn't they think they needed those extra ballots? They printed them out in the first place right unless youbre suggesting the printed them on election night.
Full audits are being requested. Why bother to have a paper ballot trail if paper ballots can't be inspected in full when requested?
So democrats had the forethought to print out extra ballots, but lacked foresight to fill them in before election night. Is that what you are saying?
The Dems needed to know who would show up at the polls to fill out the ballots with the names of those who did not show up at the polls. Elementary my dear Watson.
Ballots have don't contain the identity of voter, only the envelopes. It's already been claimed these fake ballots weren't in envelopes, so you're theory has already been debunked.
yes... and then your name gets crossed out of the voter roll. and then in the middle of the night the names that WEREN'T crossed out of the voter roll were used to fill the empty ballots. Duh
Doesn't matter if the election official in a county is Democrat or Republican. All counties should have extra blank ballots available in case machines break down.
Huh??? Again, ballots don't have names on them, so names aren't needed to fill in empty ballots. There is not identification on the ballot itself. If you are saying the envelopes were signed at night, that doesn't explain why democrats lost in the down ballots because you can still fill out ballots without needing a name.
They could be, so that doesn't need an explanation. That's simply veering to a related, but tangential, subject within the realm of "How many ways could someone cheat an election." You can ask "Why?" to anything. It's the never-ending question kids figure out around 3rd grade, eh? Why is that?
But your claim is that democrats lost in the down ballots because they didn't have time to fill out the ballots. I've countered that claim saying they would have pre-filled out the ballots like any smart cheater would. In addition, no statute exists saying states have to finish counting by midnight, so when you say they didn't have time, they certainly had plenty of time as states didn't stop counting until a week after election night.
Are you sure? You mean to tell me saying “Trump said so” isn’t good enough for the courts? Sheesh....those judges are such sticklers, aren’t they?
Courts refused to look at any evidence. Court cases were tossed due to process issues like lack of standing or filing cases too late. Regardless of evidence of fraudulent voting, the Congressmen who will object to the electoral count on Wednesday are more likely to simply show that states in question broke their own state voting legislation. Much cleaner to prove because it is simpler and less time intensive. They can investigate the mountains of fraudulent voting accusations and convict felons over the next several years. Very often people convicted of voting felonies do take a year or so to gather enough evidence for a conviction and go through the courts' due process system. You think the cheaters were aware of that? (Rhetorical question.) I think probably so.
I didn't claim Democrats lost down ballot. I specifically said that Democrats won the House and the Senate will be determined with the Senate run-off next week. The focus of election interference was on the top-line Biden/Trump race. If someone is filling out multiple ballots, they can fill out a higher quantity of ballots by only working with the top-line, than they can fill out by painstakingly circling every single candidate down ballot in addition to the top-line. Let's say you can completely fill in 1 ballot in 2 minutes up and down ballot, or you can fill in just the presidential oval on 20 ballots every 2 minutes by skipping down ballot races. If your priority is on the winner of the Executive Office, then what does any "smart cheater" do? Anyway, you're asking a bunch of hypothetical questions. You're smart enough to figure out the answers.
Two cases were tossed because of standing. One was just a big middle finger. One was too late. The other 50+ cases were tossed because of lack of evidence. Makes no sense. If we caught the guy in PA who used his dead mother's name, we would have caught massive voter fraud. It would stick out like a sore thumb. All this has already been debunked and dismissed. It's a pathetic circus act. I know what they're doing. It's despicable. It's the same crap that we've already seen. The Democrats aren't going to sit by and say nothing, so I see the Republicans embarrassing themselves (yet again), except to the Trump base, who they think they'll need in two years.
The smart cheater hires more people to fill in the ballots. Hard to believe there was a coordinated effort among 5 states to cheat, but they couldn't find enough democrats willing to fill in some bubbles. You don't have to fill in every bubble, just the senate and house. The other bubbles are for councilman and propositions.