It's worth a try.

30 trillion in debt and going to go up 1.5 trillion a year for the next decade, free money flowing every which way and these Libs, with their whiney mouths wrapped around the US teat and dripping with its milk actually have the gall to complain.

amazing

 

Because you are under the delusion that your personal situation out weighs all others. It doesn't....you just lucked out in the ways I previously described.

And again, why do you keep assuming that no one who is on gov't assistance of any kind has never worked? That is a fallacy you need to justify your selfish attitude, as I previously laid out in #2 http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/its-worth-a-try.588345/#post-1072671362

And bottom line, would it kill you to share? Seriously, WTF is your problem if you are not left broke or hungry by sharing? Inherent rich folk didn't earn their money, and they get tax breaks that YOU have to pick up the slack for. I don't hear you complaining about that....but take a dollar from you to feed a homeless guy and you howl like a wounded banshee.

 

And of course, the countless billions that large corporations DON'T PAY in taxes has nothing to do with the debt. Nope, you just bend over and smile for another from the people who use you like a door mat while they outsource jobs overseas and get a tax break for it.

 

Exactly. Government knows exactly how much money it’s taking in so if they spend more than that it’s on them, not the people they coulda woulda shoulda taxed.

debts are racked up by overspending. Not undertaxing. Get that simple concept through your skull buddy

 

I never lucked out. I worked.

Where did I say that.

My only problem is people assuming that they are entitled to what I worked hard for.

By the way. I don't mind giving to the needy . I do object to being forced to give to people who are capable of work but don't work as hard as I did.

 

You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. The government spearheaded by old Barney Frank forced them to make a certain amount of their loans inside low-income minority neighborhoods in order to not have their banks punished. The problem is there were not enough QUALIFIED borrowers in those neighborhoods to make their numbers. So in order to keep their lending ability, they were FORCED to give loans to unqualified borrowers.

 

Taking money from someone else is not sharing its STEALING.

So let me ask you this... lets assume we have a child who is middle class and came from a very good positive happy home and we have a child who is broke ass poor and has nothing and came from a crappy terrible family.

As such no matter how much the teachers try to help the poor kid he doesn’t seem to be able to make anything better than a D while the kid from the good happy family makes straight A’s. Should the child who made straight A’s be forced to “share” his GPA with the poor kid? Go from an A to a B and let the poor kid go from a D to a C?

 

I have a solution to the problem.

If someone asserts they want government assistance because they’re not able to get a job, we will give them government assistance. However, they are required to put in 10 job applications a week. And we need to have a copy of each of those applications. Then we will call the employers and ask them if they received those applications. If they did and they didn’t hire them then we can ask them why. If the job is still open and the individual is qualified we can push for them to be given the job.

If they didn’t receive the application then we will provide it to them and discuss with the employer about hiring the person if they’re qualified.

If they’re offered the job and the person turned down the job, they should lose all government assistance. How does that sound? Since you seem to claim they all want to work. Let’s test that theory out.

 

Is confiscation coming:

 

the banks, and any big corporations are not FORCED to do anything by the government. not in the usa at least. the banks invented these mortgage based derivatives that they calculated would be profitable even if a percentage of bad risks defaulted.

and guess what? after a huge crash the taxpayers bailed them out and the right people were , as always, well compensated.