Disney has been outspoken on DeSantis' parental rights bill but silent on Uyghur genocide

Disney is both Pro-Slaver and Pro-Grooming.

Teachers Who Insist They’re Not Teaching Your Kid About Sex Also Weirdly Outraged By Ban On Teaching Your Kid About Sex.

​

 

I pointed that out in another thread. I guess the reason behind it is they really don't care about Uyghurs like they care about grooming and exploiting children. Only dishonest people would oppose parents having a say in what happens with their children and them trying to protect them. It says a lot about those who keep calling it the "don't say gay" bill. They're okay with little children being exposed to and taught about sex. I'm surprised they're not rallying against keeping a list of sex offenders. It's right up their alley.

 

Only dishonest people would create meaningless laws to give parents a say in something they always had a say in.

Which was never the case to begin with.

You've been swindled by a populist politics.

 

How else could parents stop activist leftist teachers from explaining gay sex to their 5 year old, unless there is policy preventing said teachers from crossing the line?

Do you have kids? Did you explain what gay sex was to them before they could comprehend what sex is? How about telling them gender doesn’t exist and kids can be boys or girls or both or neither? You think it’s appropriate for a TEACHER to have that conversation with your child without your knowledge? You like grooming children and adjusting their POV before they can even comprehend what all this is? Easy way to **** up a kid, but that’s the point. Activist Leftist teachers who openly discuss what parents don’t want their kids hearing want to groom these kids and it’s messed up.

And if you think teachers aren’t doing this you haven’t seen TikTok teachers bragging about the crap they’re doing. Maybe not that extreme but still NOT doing their job. Their job isn’t to sexually influence children.

 

The parents are not stopping it. The government created censorship laws to censor something that was not being taught in the first place. The censorship law was designed to tickle the ears of the uninformed, and you fell for it.

You've been played. Bigly.

 

Sorry, I'm not for exploiting and grooming children. They shouldn't be exposed to that sort of stuff.

 

Neither are the schools. Not one school in FL was exploiting and grooming 3rd grade children.

You were played.

Lets create a law which allows people to drink tap water. I mean, who doesn't want to drink water. Which politician wants to be the hero and legalize tap water? DeSantis?

 

Sounds like you're calling me a liar. Sounds awfully close to a personal attack.

 

Take it any way you want. If you want to play the victim, then so be it, but what I said is true either way.

Any thoughts about the tap water laws? We need it as much as we need laws against imaginary "groomers".

 

Oh please. Leftists like yourself can’t even refer to the bill by its name. You have to make one up to sell it to the slathering idiots who think it’s OK for a 3 year old to learn that girls and boys don’t actually exist. Not confusing at all. Again, why are you so afraid of NOT teaching what you claim isn’t being spoken about? If no one is saying it then what’s the problem? It’s because they ARE. Seems those most opposed to the bill have no children anyway, so again.. SHOCKING. I’m sure these are all actors right?

 

No clue what you are talking about, but sure sounds like you drank a double dose of the Kool-Aid.

Afraid? No I am not afraid of imaginary things, but you obviously are.

 

And the video, clearly it has proved the point of many of the folks you called a liar

 

We can also post vids of racist fruitcake teachers and claim that these people represent the GOP side of life in school.

 

Now that is a good joke.

 

uh.. yeah that is what the OP did. lol
You go prove that Disney ever mentioned that they support the genocide of the Uyghurs.
All you and the OP got going is that they haven't commented on it, and so the right wing "logic" is that they support it.
Have you condemned the genocide in Myanmar? I haven't seen it. According to the rule of right wing logic, it means you support it. tss tss.

 

The truth is only groomers and abusers oppose children being protected. They want to exploit and use them and that's why they have to lie about the "don't say gay" bill. Otherwise people would realize what kind of sick people they are.

 

They have to lie because the truth exposes their desire exploit children. To groom them exactly as they desire. If they didn't lie about it then more people would realize the truth behind the opposition which is to take advantage of children. Parents are concerned about their children and they are attacked and demonized for it. And the people doing it are the ones who want the right to expose those kids to their own personal agenda. Lying about the bill is in their best interest because it helps to protect children, something they do not like.

 

Then please explain why the teachers in the video are saying what they’re saying? And this is only a tiny sample of teachers “brave” enough to make their true feelings known. Who knows how many are practicing and preaching inappropriate lessons to impressionable children. It’s NOT their place.

So either admit you agree with grooming children or you side with parents and simply want them to decide when sexuality needs to be discussed. Is this such a hard answer. It shouldn’t be. You either think it’s OK to talk with 5 year olds about your escapes on your gay cruise or your simply tell them, you went on a cruise with your partner. Is that so hard? I really doubt a straight teacher tells her students about her STRAIGHT cruise she went on. She would just say they went on a cruise and had fun and that’s it. That’s NORMAL!!! For a teacher to then start talking about how oppressed they feel going on ordinary cruises so they feel forced to go on gay cruises because they perceive the world hates them…those conversations need to stay out of the classroom. But they’re happening. So this bill would remove that. And if it’s NOT happening, this bill doesn’t STOP ANYTHING, because it’s “wink, wink” nod nod, not really happening if you know what I mean, wink wink.

So. Simply put. Do you think parents have final say over who should talk to their kids about sex and radical gender studies or do you think it’s the state’s job? If you actually have children, there is only ONE answer and it’s the same answer every responsible parent has. It’s OUR job to teach OUR kids about sex and gender. If teachers followed actual science and said it’s binary except in super RARE circumstances, no one would take issue because that’s what’s it’s always been. But that’s NOT what’s being discussed anymore. There are not 20 genders. A girl can NOT be a boy today and a girl tomorrow. That propaganda can stay in the home or be discussed scientifically as the mental disorder that it is. And it is a mental disorder. And even then it’s NOT appropriate for kids. They’re too young to be confused or groomed to think a certain way that glorifies mental illness that leads to extreme cases of depression and suicide. It should never be normalized or accepted as OK. It’s not. It’s sad, and it’s an illness. Simply being Gay is “normal”. Being gender fluid is not. And teachers have no reason to have any of those discussion with 1st graders.

 

I just linked a video with many people admitting it’s happening. And that’s only those willing to record it. Use your eyes and ears.

 

And oddly enough, and as usually, WE don't see one in your post

 

your google broke?




have an other one
https://7news.com.au/news/social/us-teacher-goes-on-racist-rant-not-realising-zoom-was-on-c-2501191

 

So "Lower ones" and they happen to be blacks? I don't see it, but I'm sure the left ran with it

 

She got fired. So I guess the university saw something in it, where you do not.
Thing is... that she first said that and then back peddles on it that it's -according to her- almost every semester, so not every semester. And that black people also score better and aren't all at the bottom. That's quiet different then saying the lowers ones happen to be blacks. But I guess you're going to defend what has been ruled to be not defendable by a university that looked into it.

She's just fixated on black people. And she does it while her eyes almost fall out of their sockets.....

 

Numbers don't lie! That's problem with the educational institutions in this country, race trumps intelligence

 

I guess that's why crazy eyes had to go.