Most Americans (71%) Oppose Transgender Agenda

America will eventually put the death knell on this Christian political project like we did with Prohibition.

 

It does show 80% reliable under the conditions the data was gathered under.

If you have better data, present it.

 

What is grooming?
How's it done?

 

There's no work being done.
That's some lame RW NONSENSE talking point based on fear and emotions.

 

Oh the irony.

 

More irony.

 

"family friendly"


Sorry why do we need these ****ing parades again?

 

Disgusting, and we don't.

 

Seems a pretty good description: "One tool common to those who sexually abuse kids is grooming: manipulative behaviors that the abuser uses to gain access to a potential victim, coerce them to agree to the abuse, and reduce the risk of being caught." https://www.rainn.org/news/grooming-know-warning-signs

 

Enough said. Sure, as another poster pointed out, examining creamated bones might not have such gender markers, but of course they can test the DNA in that case, if it is present, to determine gender. If it's not present, there may be other ways, but that's getting a bit into the weeds. Point is, any skeleton with an intact pelvis can be sexed. Just like when our dog adopted us, I had to turn her upside down to figure out if she was a she. Until I did, for all I knew, it could have been a he. But it was not.

 

Those conditions being cremated bones. How are you still supporting injecting this information?

 

Many of our "leftist" friends might have graduated from the Nancy Pelosi school of signing first and then reading what they signed later. Trouble with that is why bother reading something you already signed. Over 200 hundred pages might be a tad too much for them to read through and digest. It's much easier for them to just go with whatever hysterical commentary the MSM spoon feeds them.

 

"family friendly"

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1668285758996901889?s=20

 

What? You mean the entire difference to support procreation dictates major differences between the genders?! WHAT?

 

Thanks.

Ahh, no, I never thought the Roe SC got it right. I'm predominantly a libertarian when it comes to government involvement in our lives. But I'm also in favor of individual communities having more control, simply because the one size fits all approach doesn't make much logical sense imo.

If you knew it was coming then you should have been mentally prepared for it. Not all that the SC decides I'm in favor of/for, but I respect the process.

I disagree. These Justices are actually anti-federalist types, preferring more State control, rather than Federal.

You can't make an omelet without cracking some eggs. The overturning of Roe was the natural outcome of the Dobb's case.

Are you under the mistaken notion that no SC ruling should ever be reviewed? Imagine how that might have affected desegregation.

It matters to me that the SC interprets the law/Constitution correctly. I accept that that doesn't always align up with my personal opinion. Why can't you understand this; that you can respectfully disagree with opposing opinions?

You rationalize it simply because an opinion other than your own that is outside your mental comfort zone. It requires a paradigm shift that you might not be ready for.

Why? There are all types of restrictions and/or laws on the books we don't personally advocate for or against. We have elections for that and expect those we elect to advocate our opinions for us.

There you go; breaking logical thinking! Say no more. The conclusion doesn't follow that I don't care about women's health and/or safety From not meeting YOUR standards.

You could, but then I'm probably twice your age and have more knowledge and personal experience on the subject than you're aware of. I still vividly remember taking a close friend to New York to get an abortion (Ohio didn't permit it) back in 1971 (before Roe].

Since when does asking a question fall under it being one of the "tons of reasons" you oppose the Dobb's decision? First, we no longer live in the days of coat hanger abortions. Yet, even if we did it would still be a matter of choice. Women made choices prior to Roe. Not every choice has to be risk free. Even a medically supervised abortion comes with risks. Any surgical procedure has them.

You're essentially repeating yourself.

 

It is disgusting isn’t’ it!
What is up with the obsession of displaying the stinky orifice of the body in public places?

https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/display
“When you display something, you show everyone. If you run up to someone in the street, throw your arms around her, and plant a big kiss on her face, you're displaying your affection for all the world to see.”

“When showing off for the ladies, peacocks fan out their colorful tail feathers, and that, too, is called a display — a word for male animal courtship behavior.”

Display ~ 1. noun “something intended to communicate a particular impression”

 

No.

 

Maybe it's symbolic, telling families to like us or kiss our ass. Lol

 

Like priests?
The RCC?
Certainly not the education system.

 

That's still not 100% accurate.
Just gives a very good idea.

Take cases like hermaphrodites.
Or some very very close to a hermaphrodite.

 

Waiting on your information.

 

The Priesthood have an important, life affirming function for our society. Drag Queens, for instance, are making a specific effort to deviate from our society: they're specifically about destroying our norms. You don't let such people anywhere near children.

 

My information is that your data point is useless. Waiting for you to substantiate your position with relevant data rather than pretending it is. I think your point is nonsensical regardless so I don't care what the actual number is. I just care that you're presenting misinformation and standing behind it rather than owning you made a mistake.

 

Bone structure is certainly not the only element of sexuality.

The laws DeSantis and others are promoting are against sexuality that doesn't happen to appeal to them.

When those laws affect healthcare and other rights, that must be flatly rejected.

 

Drag queens only entertain.
Priests only perform a function to members of a group.
Molesting kids and cover up is not one of those functions.