Too much evidence....

I've noticed that you get vulgar and profane when you know that you are losing.

The goal is educating the American People on the deep corruption of the Bribed Biden Administration so that they have the best information possible as they cast their votes in the primaries and the general election. It's going very well. You're welcome.

Now that is perfectly clear that Hunter WAS selling access. The newest pathetic lie from too many of the losers are the left is "don't believe your eyes" it's all an illusion.

The new Democrat line: Hunter was selling an "illusion" of access.


"Don't believe your eyes, folks, it's all an 'Illusion'"!

'The spin is in! Hunter Biden was just selling the “illusion” of access. Joe Biden had no idea who was on the phone or at the dinners and anyway he just talked about the weather and is guilty of nothing'.

Nearly 60% of the American People figured Biden was probably taking bribes before they were forced to cede all this ground in the face of evidence and testimony that Biden, despite his years of denials, absolutely was participating in a massive bribery scheme as the $Millions poured into the bank accounts of 9 different Biden's, but get this, Biden never caught on to the faud.

And, of course, the $10M in bribes paid before he forced the firing of the prosecutor, was all a coincidence. So follow this:

• The Corrupt Ukrainian Oligarchs, gave the Bidens $10M in bribes, to get the prosecutor fired, and put Joe on the phone to close the deal, but Joe, never caught on.
• Then Joe did force the firing of the prosecutor, by threatening to withhold a $Billion in US aid, and even while Trump was impeached for even mentioning it, Biden never figured it all out.
• And the fact that Biden got the prosecutor fired after the bribe payment, to get the prosecutor fired, was just happenstance!

I suspect as this continues, the ranks of the dwindling minority who don't understand that Joe Biden was taking bribes, will continue to be decimated as the election season progresses. You may be in the company of single digits, before long.

'The fact that Joe was connected to Burisma through his son and used his power as VP to get a prosecutor investigating Burisma fired was pure coincidence, yet another illusion. That millions of dollars flowed from Burisma to the Biden family, too, is illusory. As are those 170 Suspicious Activity Reports.'

That this where they are retreating to, demonstrates the desperate straits they are in.

Have fun selling this crap!

 

Hunter leveraged the family name, and he admitted it.

Guess what, that's not illegal.

Not one iota of evidence has been given by Comer to implicate Joe, or impeach him.


he even admitted it.

Hannity: Do you have evidence?
Comer: I sure hope so.


There it is, NO EVIDENCE.

You just can't handle the fact that your boy is indicted every which way, and then some.

 

Again you seem certain that you are the target audience, you are not. You will continue to spin and deny no matter how obvious the evidence is.

The audience is the remaining 43% of the United States that are still clinging to the myth that Bribed Joe Biden wasn't on the take, and believe those numbers are dropping fast.

You're biggest problem is that Bribed Joe Publically Admitted to withholding the $1B in US aid to prompt the firing of the company that was gave the Bidens $10M.

'In Washington, influence-peddling is an art form, and the Bidens appear to be political Rembrandts. Demands are conveyed through as few people as possible. For example, Archer reportedly detailed how, in 2015, Mykola Zlochevsky and Vadym Pozharski, two executives of the Ukrainian energy firm Burisma, pressed Hunter to "get help from D.C." to fire a Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating Burisma for corruption. Archer reportedly said that Hunter, Zlochevsky and Pozharski stepped away to make a call.'

'That is how it is done — not on a speakerphone in a popular restaurant filled with political and media figures while ordering more breadsticks.'

'Then-Vice President Biden, who oversaw U.S. support for Ukraine, later made a billion-dollar aid package dependent on the prosecutor’s firing. The prosecutor was promptly fired, as Joe Biden himself later bragged.'

'That is why Hunter could tell Chinese business associates that "The Bidens are the best at doing exactly what the Chairman wants." What that corporate chairman wanted, of course, was influence.'

https://themessenger.com/opinion/th...er-reveals-the-niceties-of-influence-peddling

 

The only thing that is obvious is that you do not understand what constitutes proof.

All that proves is that Republicans are clever at bamboozling their constituents.

In fact, that is not a problem at all. I'd say you have a problem with the truth.
Well, this is incontrovertible truth you traffic in conspiracy theories. Applying leverage to achieve foreign policy aims is a common diplomatic tactic. The only beneficiary in that exchange was the United States, our allies and the IMF, noting that, at the time, it was a favored objective by both Republicans and Democrats. This story is a dead horse, I posted the complete story a few years ago.

No evidence has ever been produced that Joe Biden received any funds whatsoever. You have no proof.

I see opinions by right wingers, that's not proof. We will get the transcripts soon of what Archer said, and what Hunter will say, and then we'll see what they really said.

It's clear to me that you have no clue as to what constitutes proof.

Your link raises concerns about the Biden family's business connections and implies that there might be some questionable activities related to influence-peddling. However, it does not offer definitive evidence of corruption or illegal actions on Joe Biden's part.

At issue is Joe Biden, you have produced not one iota of incontrovertible evidence proving corruption by Joe Biden.

Your posts are nothing but opinions by right wing websites.

Moreover, for years you guys on the right claimed Burisma was corrupt, now you want to believe what they are saying, just because,
all of the sudden, it fits your narrative.

 

Interesting what people consider to be factual narratives because most think that they come from scripted mainstream media outlets that bend, distort, or do not report on any given narrative that may implicate anyone or suggest anything of that someone.
Where independent investigative journalists that fly by the seat of their own pants, not sponsored by globalists/corporations who spin or not information, get ridiculed by those who are part of the MSM cheer squad and are in fact the clueless ones.
What investigative journalists find due to their diligence in their craft, the truth and facts are uncovered. But most people will at best, laugh at their findings only to be put into the conspiracy theory basket. Any outlet that churns out news for ratings and a profit should be the ones scrutinised for their accuracy and ability to present actual facts, something they've forgotten or lost some time back how to actually create news from finding it, rather than from reading it from a script.

 

What makes your sources so credible?

 

It's explained in what you quoted me.

 

Your quote talks about why other sources are not credible, so what makes your sources more credible?

 

I suppose you over looked this part, as I said, it was explained in the initial post.

Any clearer?

 

Just because a source is not part of the globalists/corporations doesn't make them credible.

 

They bring more to the table and shed more light on narratives than that of MSM who are given their scripts to read from.
An example is the Hunter Biden Laptop. Alt news/independent investigatory journalists pounced on the story and made it public, while MSM said it was bullshit. A year later, MSM was on the band wagon saying Hunter's laptop story is true, funny that.

 

Nope, I doubt that I could sell the list of crap you've put forth nor would I even try,
Such compelling truths that their court cases are ... 0.
The latest convicted awaiting sentencing "star" witness, as opposed to the one hiding from the criminal authorities, said he never heard of any business discussed with then VP Bush nor with ex VP Bush. You are now down to a guy who got fired at the request of VP Bush with the joint approval of all the other Western European Heads of State or their agents that were there and a businessman who has proof but as yet has not presented anything 8 years on. Think for just a second, had Bush Sr demanded the firing of the guy to keep his financials secret why on Earth would he go on camera and joke about it? I wouldn't hold your breath. Has it not occurred to you that if he actually had such evidence he would have given, excuse me, sold it to the ex president T****?

 

Did you miss the deep irony of your own comment??!!! Rhetorical.

 

When you send your case to a democrat paid for judge and lawyers, what else would you expect from a case regarding Biden?

 

@Patricio Da Silva

"Hunter leveraged the family name, and he admitted it."
No... Hunter leveraged the VP of the US.... and his partners Devon Archer and Tony Bobulinski admitted it..

 

@Zorro

"I've noticed that you get vulgar and profane when you know that you are losing."
Keep it up and he will put you on ignore... sort of like sticking his fingers in his ears and singing lalalalala..

 

Did Hunter play on his last name? Yes. Is there evidence Joe was involved in the deals Hunter entered in to? No. Did Archer's testimony just support that assertion? Yes.

 

They get ridiculed because they do not adhere to journalistic standards. Like having proof of the garbage they spew. They intentionally misinform their audience........who are folks like you.

 

I don't consider Chinese as the enemy since my spouse is also Chinese. My spouse's grandmother lived in the time during the rebellion as a child and survived the Great Famine as well. I tried to get an oral history professor and translator to get her to tell her story, but she refused and I respected that. I am not fond of the Chinese Government, but I think we have gone overboard with both Trump, who did business in China and still does, and Obama/Biden. And this anti-Chinese sentiment started with Obama, went full monty with Trump, and is still going on with Biden. There are currently 3 million foreigners living in China, and about half are Americans. Most work as professional managers in Chinese firms or US firms, some are attorneys or tax consultants, and this does not include the people and their dependents who work in the consulates and embassy in that country. So, I would not take everything from Serpentza or Leowhy86 as the gospel truth. The fact is they were both kicked out because they didn't follow the rules and were interviewing people without their permission. And that is why they were asked to leave.

 

And still no evidence that Joe Biden was given and accepted any bribes.

No checks, no cash, nothing of value.

No evidence of any deposits.

Nothing.

Nada. Zippo.

Go ahead and start impeachment hearings, Joe will get away scot free. He won't even get convicted by the GOP controlled House.

Why? Cuz no actual evidence of a bribe.

 

Who suck it up like it's honey and their Winnie the Pooh

 

Go ahead and try to impeach Joe Biden.

He will not be impeached even by a GOP-controlled House.

There is no evidence of Joe Biden receiving any money from anybody. Your impeachment hearings will turn into a laughing stock and will help Joe Biden win the election.

 

There is no DOJ investigation into Joe Biden receiving money from anyone... so you will not have any evidence produced by the agency that investigates. What did Joe Biden know and when did he know it?

Thanks Dan
https://truthsocial.com/

 

Where do you look for your evidence, with MSM's circus of bullshit?

 

When you refer to journalistic standards, do you mean reading from a script? Then no, they don't. They're not influenced by profit or ratings and the fact that any funds they'd get don't get pulled from their globalist owners.

Btw, I bet you never considered the fact that any and all departments of the Biden admin cover the Biden crime family's tracks, that's why there is "no evidence". There is, it's just hidden.