What's so great about Diversity?

No, correcting you entails properly pointing out that you have no idea how many people were statistically sampled and that your claim that it needs to be 10% when sampling a population as large as black people is utterly preposterous and bereft of even the slightest knowledge in the topic of which you speak.

To claim that in order to accomplish that aim that I must first provide an overlay is about as nonsensical as it gets. I am sensing a pattern here.

 

Uh-huh. Why not hold that chart to the same standard? There is no way they could know that is what you are saying. I could have just stated that as well right? You are saying to me that there is no way i could know that chart is inaccurate, and thats simply BS. I gave my methodology, as flawed as it may be but you haven't corrected my claim.

I call BS, where is a more relevant chart. Thats my claim.

 

Arrogance? Me?

I'm not the one who thinks he's deduced the correct moral position to take on a difficult decision that was made by men who were actually living in those times.

I respect that I wasn't there and I'm glad that others made that decision.

 

Uhhhh....because I am not , nor have I ever been talking about that chart.

Can a study be conducted that reveals IQ by race? Of course it can, just as statistical sampling can be used on countless other endpoints.

In regards to what I was saying that there is no way that you could know that, I was referring to your statement...

"Totally irrelevant as the amount of minorities accurately IQ tested back then never even met a relevant sample size to determine anything."

There is in fact no way that you could know how many minorities have been accurately tested.

Yes, I have properly corrected you numerous times in this conversation. I just did it again.

 

What ever, im done with it. None of you can back it up as I suspected, cant even prove it meets your own threshold for sample size. Your intentions for engaging with me are whats truly irrelevant.

 

Apparently, you like to throw around nonsensical claims while not being called out for those nonsensical claims.

Sorry. You have been served. Again.

Abandoning your defenseless position is undoubtedly a good move for you.

 

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-iq-by-country


It easy to find the average IQs. I can pull them nationally for the USA if you want and I'll deliver the source(s) for it. The sources for this map are down in the bottom of the link provided. Some of it is hard to find considering it's "racist" to point out the obvious. In California they've banned IQ tests because it impacted marginalized groups (Low IQ races) from getting into higher education classes.

It's observable through historical and present information. Blacks as race within the USA and elsewhere are underperformers in civilized tasks. The same applies to the mixed Hispanics who are Native American which you can also identify by their outward apperances being shorter and darker than their mainland Iberians cousins.

 

Then tell us why anyone of any color or having any IQ level should take unearned (UNEARNED) income from the government when they contribute little or nothing in tax revenue to that same government.,, and then expect to be able to vote in how that government is run?! Classic 'tail-wagging-the-dog'.

There is a place for welfare -- but it should be limited to those who cannot support themselves, because of chronic diseases, independently-verified injuries, or birth defects. But, NO ONE should be able to VOTE in this country who takes UNEARNED income from the government within the same calendar year -- period!

 

Yes.

Other than stating "it's good".

There are none. There were some but there are none.

No, they are not.

 

What is a "civilized task"?

 

You don't know much about statistics, though.

 

Having a functioning government, roads & bridges that are working, justice system that doesn't involve vigilante executions & tribal warfare, power & water & sanitation, etc. These are all areas where looking at any backwards nation you'd see they struggle in all of those.

 

Has nothing to do with race.

 

Has everything to do with it. Every area around the world that isn't advanced/civilized is either in the state of war and/or genetically they're lower IQ.

 

Is the US governed by non-whites or has it a lower IQ?

 

Diversity promotes racism!

Questions?

 

Intentional or diversity by design does.

 

Both.

USA is controlled by nepotism, corruption, corporate sponserships, diversity, and has a well established racial class of non-Whites leading almost every department Federally. Just as we now see IQ discrimination at play when it comes to hiring cops that have midwit tier IQ levels and completely disregarding high IQs for the reason "they'll be bored". Diversity hires for government jobs over Whites being legal and even the S&P500 brags about hiring exclusively minorities. Our enforcers aren't intelligent enough to question, our middle management is corrupt materialists/hedonists, and our upper management are 2% of the population yet control nearly everything within the USA.

 

I don't fully agree but there's a lot of truth in it. But you are overplaying the racial aspect.

 

Race has a lot to do with the possibilities of intelligence. It's one of the reasons why there are more male geniuses and morons because on a genetic level men & women are different. The same applies to any breed of animal as to whether they're going to be naturally intelligent. Go look at dog or horse breeds. They'll tell you how each breed behaves before it is even born because those characteristics are on a genetic level. The same applies for uncivilized people who didn't invent metal working, the wheel, and/or written language. If these same people still after being handed all of this technology can't even emulate a 19th century society they're well below the genetic level in terms of the average intelligence of civilized people.

 

I don't see what life expectancy has to do with it and dogs are specifically bred. They don't just drop out of the sky.

 

It's an easy example as to which countries have actually developed/civilized while those at the bottom are clearly not.

I wasn't measuring the life expectancy of dogs even though that can be done genetically and environmentally based upon civilization too. Dogs were mentioned because I can just as easily pull something like this....

 

We can even measure animals based upon the mirror tests and a myriad of other tests. Such as crows being able to solve problems. Crows are genetically different from other birds. We wouldn't say Pigeons are capable of what crows do simply because they're also birds.

 

I repeat: Life expectancy has nothing to do with being developed/civilized.

Once again dog breeds are manipulated. They are not natural. Note also that "the most intelligent breeds" are represented by all colours, not only white.