Since Democrats insist no evidence exist of Hunters money laundering or peddling Daddys influence, there's only one reason left to drag his Daddy through all this during an election year. All Hunter has to do to shut this down and slap the committee in the face is provide his FARA registration and the services he provided to take 24 million from China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Romania, and Ukraine, which he distributed to 9 Biden family members. But Hunter refuses to provide the very documentation that puts everything to bed. So if Hunter and Joe are as innocent as Democrats demand, then the only thing left is Hunter's new found hatred for his Daddy and his desire to continue the investigation into his family and Joe. If none of it is true, why not squash it like Jared Kushner did when he was called before committee and made fools of all of them by providing his registration with the SEC to legally invest money from a foreign national.
Because of course, the rules become rubber bands when they apply to the left side of politics. That, and of course if they fessed up to the truth, there would be no defense.
Imagine the threads and screaming from the left if Don Jr. was found to have laundered 24 million from 5 foreign nationals and distributed it to Trump family members. The thousands of apocalyptic law theories would crash PF in a matter of hours.
Bribed Demented Open Borders Joe Biden Denial: I 'Did Not Interact' With Hunter and Jim's Foreign Business Partners 'The President became quite snappish when reporters pressed him with questions about the results of recent hearings and witness testimony. Apparently, nobody is supposed to notice or bring up any uncomfortable topics.' 'President Biden again denied Friday that he interacted with business associates of his brother James Biden and son Hunter Biden — despite Hunter himself confirming to Congress this week that his dad attended a pair of DC dinners as vice president with various foreign patrons.' 'Biden went on to claim that he "did not interact" with their business partners. It's at least the second time he's made that statement in the past couple of months. Interestingly, the claim has been contradicted by multiple witnesses during recent House hearings. Among the people declaring that the opposite is true were both Hunter and Jim Biden, the "business partners" in question. Both cited instances where Joe did plenty of "interacting" with various individuals who wound up mysteriously pumping vast sums of money into the Biden family's coffers.' 'By this point, most of you likely recall the many times both on the campaign trail and while in office that Joe Biden has said he "never spoke to my son, my brother, or anyone for that matter about their foreign business dealings." He famously declared that there would be "a wall" between private business and government operations. He also said he had never received any money from China.' 'James Comer and the rest of the House leaders conducting this investigation have proven all of those statements to be blatant lies. We have confirmation of that reality straight from the mouths of the main players themselves. Biden has spent years lying to the American public with a straight face, confident that his control of the system would keep him safe and leave his family's secrets squirreled away in the closet. He has also remained confident that the' Lying Fake News 'media would provide him with cover and prevent the American people from finding out about all of this and turning on him in response. In that regard, his beliefs were well-founded. They've certainly done their best to do precisely that and many of them continue to do so to this day.'
When Hunter was put on the board of Burisma, it was obvious that the Biden crime family could be bought. There is no way the board of Burisma was sitting around and said instead of look at someone with experience in the energy sector, let us get a guy who has a drug problem, because we need someone to score hookers and drugs for us.
And then it was just a giant coincidence that Daddy blackmailed the government to fire the prosecutor looking into the crooked company that he was benefiting from. You have to really be guzzling the Kool-Aid not to see the obvious connection there
A person would be very foolish to think that being a republican or democrat made you smart or stupid, wise or foolish. People with those variables exist on both sides- but there is a kind of magnetism, a gravity at work too. Just as birds of a feather flock together, people will be drawn to groups whose values are similar to their own- because that makes them more comfortable, and more secure. It's like both sides see a need for a source of support for their life. One side plants gardens to produce future crops, cares for them, and they bear fruit. They believe you are responsible for yourself, and that is your duty. The other side sees no need to plant their own garden, because their neighbors have planted fruitful gardens, and figure they can pick what they need from them. They believe they are entitled to take what they need- but not obligated to plant or produce it. It's fair to live off the productivity of others.... and make others carry the burden for their mistakes. It seems pretty similar to what parasites in nature do. No party is purely one or the other.... but the tendency to join the one that supports your personal standards is strong, and as a result, the parties tend to reflect the mindsets of those who support them and vice versa. Those willing to live off others will always blame those they see as hosts for being unfair, having no right to complain, lying about what they see as rightful. Most of them will believe it. They have to- they are dependent on the ability to take from others. Of course, the people who believe in living off others think that no matter what they do, how much they consume or destroy, that those others will continue to plant and they will always be able to feed on what they produce. This is general, both sides will make mistakes- but the core beliefs behind them tends to be consistent. These two sides will always be in conflict. But nature shows us that parasites can kill the entity they feed on- and a nation that feeds on its best to benefit its worst will have the same fate. You have to decide which of those mindsets will be your guide.
