Kyle Rittenhouse Storms Off Stage After Being Confronted by Students

I think the moment when the case was clenched as when rittenhouse's lawyer asked the one-armed guy on the stand..... To identify the man that shot him in the arm and of course he pointed to Rittenhouse.....

And then he asked him if it was true that you were pointing a pistol at him right before he shot you..... Of course he had to answer yes..... Case closed.

 

Here is a good link for getting A LOT of the original videos unedited. YouTube and Google have damn near scrubbed the internet clean of the raw video. All is edited to only show KR in a bad light. This even shows GG afterwards as the paramedic is working on his elbow. His elbow was so messed up he couldn't let go of his pistol. Paramedic had to pry it out of his hand. You can hear him on audio say it was still loaded.

https://gunstreamer.com/watch/every-video-of-kyle-rittenhouse-kenosha-shooting_F9KmoZOauyBShmd.html

 

Thanks for posting that lest left wing YouTube attempt to scrub it from memory.

Right there on the first part of the video for all the people saying they weren't supposed to be there..... Kyle Rittenhouse is walking in front of an armored police vehicle that told him and his friends thanks we appreciate what you guys are doing....

There's one left-wing fantasy shot down the drain. The police were grateful for their presence

 

I dont know if he is good when it comes to public speaking, the audio of the video is so bad I dont even 100% understand the questions the "activists" who adapted to modern civilization asked before in a normal manner accurately, not to talk about his answers.

He left the stage when acitivist monkeys successfully overturned the Q and A by their monkey noises. These are the guys who are definitely not up for a discussion and the organizer of a Q & A should keep them out, otherwise his guests leave rightfully so. If you are as the host not up to the challenge, it will be your fault.

I am not saying that you are necessarily wrong, never heard him, I dont know if he is good in public discussions or lousy as you claim and by this video you cant tell. I dont see the point liberals wanna make by putting that stuff online. It just proves the point a lot of liberal activists are lost for a civilized discussion, its just force you can use on them.

I dont know what the circumstancesd were, but if its correct what some here claim that it was on a campus and these guys are so called "students" they are the guys who should get a real job instead, if they are not up for a discussion.

 

I do not believe the weapon was illegal. If it were he would have been charged with a weapons offense.

KENOSHA, Wis. — The judge in Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial on Monday dismissed the misdemeanor gun possession charge the teenager faced after defense lawyers argued that he did not violate the state statute in question because of his age and the length of the barrel of his semiautomatic rifle.Nov 17, 2021

Why Kyle Rittenhouse No Longer Faces a Gun Possession ...

 

The gun wasn't illegal and he was lawfully carrying the firearm. You are forgiven for being wrong because this is a lie the media told that they never corrected. It's ironic you're making this mistake considering your username.

But because of his age and the type of weapon he was carrying, he was unquestionably in complete compliance with the law. The judge dismissed this charge outright which means it never went to a jury. He had no choice because the charge being applied to Rittenhouse was unlawful.

He never should have been charged with anything in the first place, but the unlawful possession charge was so egregiously wrong that it fell apart immediately.

 

I make no defense of Rittenhouse, but mob behavior does not merit defense either.

 

The campus mob was the real danger to our society.
The Angry Mob Comes for Kyle Rittenhouse Again

Victoria Taft, PJ Media

 

Although from the video only I dont see them necessarily as dangerous, they just wanna be the winner in a debate by making more noise by screaming. However its a shame that these guys are on a university if it is a campus. As access to universities is limited, there is something wrong with the selection process, if people populate a university who are not able to engage in a civilized discussion. Maybe that is the effect of diversity guidelines and some highly intelligent Asian Americans were refused to study in favour of some people from another "neighbourhood".

A campus should not be the place where people dont know better than "winning" discussions by sheer volume and noise.

 

He was hit in the back of the head while running to safety. He was jump-kicked while on the ground. He was hit over the head with a skateboard. And a criminal pointed an illegally possessed firearm at his head.

The videos shown at the time showed all of this.

 

Dude, this is the Internet, just saying you are an expert on these issues is more than a stretch.

 

We need to ban skateboards!

 

I read the first page alone here and the specious vitriol and invective is just overwhelming and not worthy repeating.
According to Rittenhouse there was already a huge safety concern do to the radical left wing rioters but they went on. It was to be a very civil affair with a brief talk by him them open the floor to questions and answers and a civil discussion. Insted the left wingers were hellbent on denying him and the event host from exercising their free speech and censoring it by drowning him out. He decided to just go to the question an answers so the crowd would have to stop and listen to the qiestions which did bring some peace but the leftwingers continued to try and interrupt. He said he in fact went about 10 minutes over tje scheduled time in spite of his security in the sides urging him to come off stage until one crossed the stage to get him off so they could sneak him out the back before the mob outside could get to him.

But the I can imagine some on the left would have been chuckling with glee had he been injuried by the leftist trying to stop him.

 

well the way you prove it is saying stuff that other experts know is true. when someone claims he was a vigilante or a murderer that pretty well demonstrates that the person who says that hasn't a clue what he is talking about.

 

that would be the leftwing approach if the guy with a skateboard prevailed AND lefties thought most skateboard users voted Republican

 

Are you asserting the you could not be seriously injured or even killed by someone wielding a skateboard at you?

Man dies after being hit in head with skateboard during fight in Santa Ana Starbucks
https://abc7.com/starbucks-fight-santa-ana-man-dies-skateboard/1098183/

Man charged in Oakland skateboard beating death
The suspect was already being prosecuted for a similar non-fatal attack in Palo Alto
https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2021/12/20/man-charged-in-oakland-skateboard-beating-death/

Man dies after being attacked with skateboard: WA officials
https://www.thenewstribune.com/news/state/washington/article278336844.html

That's just the first three hits.

 

You can have my skateboard when you pry it from my hands!

 

We need to ban trolling.

 

OK, lemme ask a very serious question here:

You are at a gathering and you are carrying because you are a 2a'r who wants to protect themselves and their family, and someone walks in with a Smith & Wesson M&P 15 slung over their shoulder......

do you:
A: Protect yourself by drawing your weapon
B: Wait to get shot

See, this is the entirety of the 2A debate. Who was protecting themselves ? A normal human being who is protecting themselves would be carrying a small weapon, possibly concealed, and would not be advertising that they have the weapon. When you see someone advertising a weapon specifically designed to kill large numbers of people, in a large crowd of people, the person with a small weapon, already in protection mode would react. When your in protection mode, you dont wait to get shot, you are in a state of heightened awareness, and would be proactive....right ?

 

You forgot option c.

Not freak out and think only a and b are the only option.

You just mind your own damn business and leave the guy alone kind of like you do when you see the police open carrying weapons

If you choose to concealed carry a weapon I certainly hope you don't do it in a state where it's legal for others to open carry.

I'm sorry that opened carry seems so scary.... Unless of course it's the police

 

I have no idea where you get this information. You must visit Left-Wing disinformation sites.

There is no such provision against a minor carrying a long-rifle in Wisconsin or in virtually every state. Even if it was a pistol is would have been legal provided it wasn't concealed and loaded and unsupervised. The only provisional requirement is the owner of the gun or a parent supervises the minor. Lots of other statutes regarding pistol and concealed carry. None apply. This was evident when the judge through out the charges Prima Facie. Prima Facie is Latin for "first look" or "on the face of it". It is basically a legal term meaning the charges are baseless and as a matter of LAW do not meet the standards for charges. Basically, the judge just throws it out saying even if you prove everything you say in your complaint it isn't a violation of law. The strongest rebuke possible. It doesn't even get a hearing.

Answer this question, under this scenario. You have some trouble in your town, and you decide, on your own, that you're going to bring your AR-15 downtown to help law enforcement. You get there brandishing your firearm, and you cross paths with the sheriff. He tells you they don't want your help, and either leave the premise or get rid of the firearm. What would you do?[/QUOTE]

I also wanted to bring up something regarding the Kenosha and other riots during that time. I was listening to an earlier video from Portland. A white guy asks a black guy to help him "burn this place". I'm black, I'm not allowed, that's on you white Antifa guys. I found it an odd statement at the time... "Not allowed?" By whom? I decided to look into the two groups and visited their websites. Both were laid out similar with their Preamble listed prominently on the opening page. Reading both Preambles they were surprisingly similar. Both were full of Marxist rhetoric with a few differences. ANTIFA's stated their goal was to undermine the Republican form of government to replace it with a Marxist government headed by Antifa (along those lines), BLM's was similar but added they were for racial justice and the eradication of the police state. They had a similar format.

This got me suspicious, so I downloaded the page file from each, opened them with a binary editor and discovered in the metadata they were both created with the same licensed copy of Word, with the same Windows login name. Looking deeper all of the leadership of BLM were former members of Antifa. Clearly the two groups were one in the same. It dawned on me what was going on. Antifa (commonly suspected to be created, funded, and run by Soros) decided it would be of benefit to create a new group designed to stir up racial animosity in the black community in an effort to destabilize American society. One of the difficulties during the riots was Antifa and BLM were intermingled. The police couldn't move on the violent Antifa rioters because they were shielded by the peaceful BLM protestors. Apparently this was no accident and the BLM protestors were instructed to remain peaceful. The Antifa were instructed otherwise. I posted what i had discovered and within hours both sites were down for at least the next day. When they came back up both Preambles had been altered. I received an email from someone with an FBI.gov address of some sort saying simply, "Good catch, but we were already well aware. Have you ever considered a job with the FBI?"

The people at the grassroots level of BLM likely joined because they were conned into thinking it is a black grassroots organization of some kind. The reality is they have been duped by rich white guys who are using them to do their bidding, which in no way aligns with the interests of the blacks on the picket lines. As far as I can tell, Antifa members are recruited from Left-Wing high schools, Universities and violent inmates after having been brainwashed by the faculties or fallen out of society. Losers basically. Point is, BLM is not a black organization.

In the videos I just posted above the first scene at the gas station there is a black guy near the iron fence who makes the statement "The white guys told us to turn off all the cameras". Strange statement.

 

https://www.politifact.com/factchec...le-rittenhouse-break-law-carrying-assault-st/

 

those of us who actually understand this issue can almost immediately tell the intentions of someone packing a firearm by the way they carry it.

 

He was acquitted, the left wing DA shouldn't have brought the charges. He won, the woke left lost. Case over

 

I wasn't responding to the trial verdict. This lie, that Rittenhouse was brandishing a legal weapon has been posted all over this thread. I'm correcting that misrepresentation. Case over.