Comer: No impeachment for Biden, criminal referrals instead

I’ll ask you the same question I posed to @popscott but in a different form :

Arrested how ? For what ?
With no EVIDENCE, no impeachment, no Senate conviction, who will arrest anybody ?
Please explain.

 

Then why is Comer running away from impeachment like a little bitch if he has enough?

 

The impeachment INQUIRY is not over... as Jordan said "we don't make snap impeachments like the Democrats do"

https://twitter.com/JudiciaryGOP/status/1772375855768969345

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GJi-cKOWoAIDYKx?format=jpg&name=small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GJi-cKOXUAAukmw?format=jpg&name=small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GJi-cKTXoAAaoBc?format=jpg&name=small
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GJi-cKOWwAA6VPb?format=jpg&name=small

 

Except for the fact that this impeachment fantasy for the GOP and rightists is over. This will NEVER be put to a vote on the House floor. The GOP after 15 months and millions of our tax dollars later have found NOTHING they can pin on Ole Joe.

It's over popscott. Sorry for your loss. Thoughts and prayers to your hurt feelings over this sham impeachment failure.

 

So, according to you, they’re still going for an impeachment vote ?

Ok, then no DOJ action is needed. Get back to us when you hold a vote.

Meanwhile, all your “invitations “ to testify and all your “requests “ for information will be returned to you and Gomer, postage due.

 

its stupid to impeach senile Joe now because the Democrats hold the senate and even if the GOP had the votes, Kamala Ho is far worse than puppet Joe

 

No he didn't.

 

I must admit that from this side of the Atlantic American politics is like a good 'whodunit'. Keep it up folks. You'll never beat Agatha Christie's murder mystery 'The Mousetrap' which ran for decades on the stage in London.

 

The Constitution does not support your reasons for disqualifying Trump. So my answer is NO!

 

What did Comer say about the money trail and how it ended up in one of Biden’s accounts?

 

So, translated into English, that means you have no EVIDENCE, a vote on articles of impeachment in the Republican controlled House would FAIL,
so talking about an arrest is rightie FANTASY.

Thanks for clearing that up.

 

The day Joetato steps out the door he will be indicted.

The process is the punishment. Lol!

They will find something.
"Show me the man and I will find the crime".

Welcome to America 2.0!

 

What did he say it show? A single loan that was paid back? Where are all the other illegal payments?

Theoretically speaking if you own a store and someone pays you with drug money, does that mean the store owner is complicit in a crime because of the money trail?

Comer has yet to prove any payment were illegal.

 

thanks for completely misrepresenting what I was saying and you are completely wrong as usual. A vote in the HOUSE may pass but the senate would not sustain it-same as what happened with Clinton and Trump.

 

You're very welcome. Anytime.

 

Because they are under a subpoena. Why should the President prove his family was not being corrupted by our worst foreign adversaries when they were pocketing tens of millions from them. Why should he not have to explain in full detail?

 

What subpoenas on any Biden are outstanding ?

Why should the President have to prove a negative ? The presumption of innocence is still in force in this country and Gomer and his critters have not offered any EVIDENCE of wrongdoing.

 

No, his witnesses turned out to be bogus. And a collection of records doesn’t mean anything unless you have evidence that they were linked, or there was some sort of quid pro quo. Comer never established either.

The whole Hunter Biden trope was cooked up by the Russians and spoon fed to Guliani.
And, of course it rested on the fundamental assumption that Joe Biden is as reckless, gullible, and stupid as Trump is.

 

Where is that in the Constitution? They can't be removed from office without impeachment, but nothing about how they can't be indicted. Matter of fact, impeachment specifically says 'for high crimes and misdemeanors' which obviously can't happen without indictments.

 

can't prosecute a sitting President

 

fake news, this was a nothingburger all along....

 

So, because the Constitution does not prevent it, you'd be happy to have a convicted thief fraudster in the White House?

 

the only reason the DOJ investigated Trump is Trump had his Saturday night massacre, firing Comey

 

His witness????

This is a "declassified" FBI FD-1023.... this is a FBI highly revered and credible CHS.... with a FBI informant.....while the FBI was has sat on this document for several years.... then the FBI claimed never existed..... and then the FBI claimed it was so sensitive it could only be seen in a SCIF while the FBI has apparently leaked classified information to the news media.... This is a witness that testified in 2023 right before Wray and Brady lied before Congress and said he was highly credible... Smirnov's name not known to Comer until the FBI released it a few months ago...
So where are the FBI investigation of the FBI document that "requires verification." came up with after sitting on it for years and Grassley/Comer uncovering to the public? It is not Comer's CHS, it is the FBI's..... how many other lies has this credible and reliable CHS told that wrecked other cases..

It seems Smirnov has another 2023 FD-1023 floating around no one else has seen.... do you have a link to it?

Comer has uncovered pages of evidence that included Joe Biden in the family shady deals... with receipts, and emails, and testimony. and bank accounts. and 170 plus SAR's, and etc... he never did need Smirnov's testimony at all... he has way more than enough "evidence that they were linked" already and has said so publicly..

 

You can impeach without indictments.