McCarthy to green light Biden impeachment inquiry this week

It all comes from them you should pay attention more. Lack of any substantives response noted.

 

Now that I’m on your side? Of course not.

“Mountain of evidence”.

 

Aw, c'mon Andy. You usually stay more currently informed than that:

https://nypost.com/2024/03/01/us-news/hunter-admits-joe-bidens-the-big-guy-but-keeps-on-lying/
https://www.hindustantimes.com/worl...-to-in-the-5m-china-deal-101709266813978.html


But you missed my point -- nearly anyone with a triple-digit IQ and reasonable comprehension ability can surmise who "Big Guy" was during the Biden Family 'business' dealings procedures. But the point (POINT) I was trying to make is that it was laughable from the beginning that Republicans would think they could blow this kind of 'shakedown' extortion racket into something that would even qualify for impeachment!

Joe wasn't even president when all that influence-peddling crap went on, and therefore Joe Biden can not (NOT) be impeached for any of it -- unless it spilled over beyond noon on January 20, 2021.

Republicans are STOOPID for not realizing that from day-one!

 

LOL!

You complaining about a lack of substance in a reply is like Trump whining about “Biden’s crimes”.

 

Thanks for the opposing opinion. It would have been better without the capitalized words.

 

@Andrew Jackson

"Hunter never "admitted" Joe was the "Big Guy" ! Period!"

But James Gilliar and Tony Bobulinksi did.

 

So what ? Speculation at best and useless as EVIDENCE.

Has Gomer delivered his “referrals” yet ?

 

So after testimony from Biden's associates, where is the part where they say Joe was part of their business?