Joe Biden got $40K in China funds, brother James admits in bombshell impeachment interview

He quit working for Biden in the later end of 2017, that's even noted in the transcript (which I do not believe you read).

It should be well noted that taxes for 2017 are filed in early 2018 (also noted in the transcript). Normally when you are paid $40k, that would be a taxable income, however this is not the case if that money is the repayment for a loan. Hence, the person handling Biden's taxes would know about any loans, however this particular individual did not file Biden's 2017 taxes, and he even noted that when asked about whether or not there were any loans.

This really couldn't be any clearer.. it's right there in the transcript, he was asked "So he never gave any loans based upon the bank records that you reviewed?" and he literally responded that 2009 through 2016 was the period he was certain on, but that a loan in 2017 he potentially would not have seen since taxes for that year are filed in 2018, which he no longer worked for Biden at that point.

 

Why do you keep bringing up taxes loans are not listed in tax forms. INTEREST is somshow me where Biden listed the interest payment. Rhe accountant was doing his finances during the period where the first loan was made and most likely when the second one was.

So when were the loans MADE and where is the proof of them?

 

The accountant is the one who brought up taxes lol

Once again, he literally said that he is only certain about 2009 through 2016 since he did not file the taxes for 2017, that's according to the source themselves. If he's the one filing the taxes, he would know about all taxable and untaxable income.

 

While Trump helps Jared to score a $25,000,000 management free from a $2,000,000,000 investment fund score (noting Jared had no prior experience) as blood money from the murderous Mohammed Bin Salman ostensibly for Trump admin's kid glove treatment over the butchering of Jamal Khashoggi .

While Trump helped Ivanka scored millions in accelerated trademarks from China in which she peddled millions worth of stuff to China while her father was negotiating with China

While Trump helped himself:



Transcript;

And bigger picture, if the outrage is over a child using a powerful political dad's influence to gain favors from a Chinese business, Chinese more broadly, which all seems important to expose otherwise, then there was also a potentially bigger story last week that somehow got almost completely overlooked. The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that workers from ZTE, a state-owned Chinese telecommunications company, had been tracked by U.S. officials exiting suspected Chinese spy facilities in Cuba. Now, that is the same Chinese company that in 2017 pled guilty to illegally exporting U.S. technology to Iran and North Korea, the same company that was then sanctioned by the U.S., and the same company for whom President Trump reversed sanctions, much to the consternation of many Republicans.

And here's why that's important: days before and then days after the announcement of the reversal of sanctions, Ivanka Trump received various trademarks from the Chinese, and immediately following the ending of the sanctions, China announced a $500 million loan to help fund a theme park in Indonesia with a Trump-branded hotel and golf course. At the time, President Trump bizarrely claimed he did it to save Chinese jobs, but Trump trade advisor Peter Navarro told Fox News something different at the time.

The president did this as a personal favor to the president of China as a way of showing some goodwill for bigger efforts. And this personal favor to China came despite intelligence reviewed during the Trump Administration that contributed to suspicions at the time that ZTE and another Chinese company might be playing a role in expanding China's ability to spy on the U.S. from the island, according to The Wall Street Journal report last week.

And I won't even mention off the condos, offices, sold and leased to both Chinese officials and Russian oligarchs.

I changed my mind, let's do it: See, the issue is that Trump ran for prez to increase 'Trump brand' awareness, and exploited his office in pursuit of business deals. This is just wrong, but Repubs don't seem to care, and that's complicity.

Copilot query results:

1. Russian Oligarchs and Trump Towers in Florida:
   • In a dramatic turn of events, the FBI conducted a raid on a luxury condo in Trump Towers III located in Sunny Isles Beach, Florida. The date was May 11, 2023.
   • The apartment in question was owned by two Russian businessmen: Oleg Sergeyevich Patsulya and Agunda Konstantinovna Makeeva1.
   • The FBI spokesperson clarified that they were “conducting court-ordered law enforcement activity in the vicinity of that location” 1.
2. Russian Investment in Trump-Branded Luxury Towers:
   • A Reuters review revealed that at least 63 individuals with Russian passports or addresses had invested a whopping $98.4 million in seven Trump-branded luxury towers in southern Florida.
   • These properties became magnets for Russian elite, and their investments added a layer of intrigue to the already glittering skyline23.
3. Trump’s Fraught Relationship with Russian Oligarchs:
   • The former president, Donald Trump, has had a complex relationship with Russian oligarchs.
   • On one hand, Russian investors poured money into Trump’s real estate ventures. On the other hand, Trump’s administration imposed major sanctions on Russian oligarchs, officials, and companies4.

In the world of high-rises and intrigue, it seems that Trump Towers have seen their fair share of both.

 

Which do not show loans other than the interest recieved as income. Where is it? Where is a record of the loan being given?

 

Maybe there was nothing written on paper.
When I was going through the divorce from my first wife, I was tight on cash so my brother loaned me $1000. I paid him back about 10 months later, $1100. I added the $100 for interest he could have gotten if he had invested it.
I'll bet he didn't report that on his income for that year, and now I find out that he might have broken some law by not reporting it.
Point is, between family members, I'll bet loans are common and reporting any interest if any is rarely done. I hadn't even considered that it needed to be reported, and I'll bet many don't.
I would say the records exist that show a $40k withdrawal from Joe's account, followed some time later with a like addition.
Wrongdoing? Not clear, but the way Comer has gone about it has not been convincing.
It doesn't matter what you or anyone else thinks it should be, only what one can prove it is. So far, nada.

 

As already cited loans of those amounts even to other family members must be documented. Where is it?

I don't care about you and your family I care what we know about the Biden family and that these alleged loans have never been documented and the family accountant at the time says he never saw any such loans taking place.

It should be a very simple matter for The Big Guy to show where he loaned the money.

It's been very convincing and nothing has been refuted to those who have actually paid attention and that is just with what they have been able to get why are the Bidens refusing to turn over the records?

 

Even if the loan itself isn't a part of your taxable income, your tax preparer would still need to know about it for accurate tax filing. Besides that, you're wasting your time telling me he knew if there were loans for the year 2017, when the man himself literally said he did not know about year 2017.

 

You must report any interest you GET from a loan you give. The loan funds would have been taken out of a personal bank account.

Show me the records, the personal accountant who handled ALL of The Big Guys personal banking says he never saw ANY loans that were given. The man literally said he handled those finances through 2017.

Prove they were loans simple as that, if you can't then join in and demand the Bidens prove their claims and refute the evidence and testimony that has been given and will stand until it is refuted.

 

If the loan was repaid in 2017, it wouldn’t be reported until 2018. So this guy doesn’t know.

But if Biden didn’t report the interest income from his brother … so what?

 

He would have seen the MONEY being transfered he handled their personal banking and the first loan was before that.

SHOW ME THE RECORDS. The interest is INCOME.

 

So you have moved from accusing Biden of influence peddling to not reporting a few hundred, maybe a couple of thousand, dollars in income. For a loan between family members that most people don’t know has to attract interest or be reported.

You guys are grasping at straws.

 

Once again, can you provide a statement from said accountant where he said he handled "ALL" finances for the year 2017?

 

Did he have another account loaded with money?

 

How much interest do the bank transfers show him getting?

 

“Mountain of evidence”.

 

I'd settle for a speedbump of evidence at this point.

 

Dude, you are going to have to try these lame excuses on people who have never loaned money to a family member before. Everyone else sees how BS they are.

 

Dude you got nothing to support the loan claim as already noted those loans are REQUIRED to be documented and interest charged else they are considered gifts and reportable. Also if The Big Guy is such an idiot tonkoan ANYONE those sums without proper agreements signed he has NO BUSINESS running the country. Dude.

None that I know of you tell me.

Then tell me why you are perfectly OK with the Biden's getting paid tens if millions of dollars from our worst foreign adversaries for nothing other than The Big Guys political influence.

 

People make personal loans all of the time without documentation of the loan or interest charged for the loan. Pretending you don't know that isn't doing you any favors. It just makes your "argument" more pathetic. And I'm not going to take any Trump supporter seriously when they say that financial issues (which they haven't even shown) should disqualify a candidate.

 

Bbbbbut China, and stuff! He lent money to his brother and didn’t collect interest! The IRS is gonna get him for that!

LOL! No, it won’t.

 

He has been quoted by you and me.

 

No moving just how they laundered the money whg haven't they turned over the records?

 

Maybe they have? Seems they have turned over a lot. And given a deposition. And still there’s no case against Joe.

 

He's been quoting saying that he is only certain about there being no loans between 2009 through 2016, and that he potentially would not know about a loan if it were made in 2017.