Climate deniers don't deny climate change any more

So what is your scientific evidence to support your claim that increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activity is not the major cause of the recent increases of global temperatures during my lifetime.
And what is the cause of the high temperatures on Venus if you claim that atmospheric CO2 is not the cause?

 

So what is the cause of the high temperatures on Venus if you claim that atmospheric CO2 is not the cause.

 

Im going to wait here while you dive into the irrelevancy of venus.

 

IOW you have no scientific evidence to support your hypothesis that atmospheric CO2 has no effect on global temperatures.

 

The earth has 400 parts per MILLION CO2. Venus has 965,000 parts per million, with sulfuric acid clouds. Absolutely no comparison whatsoever with earth. Your grasping for comparisons to venus demonstrates who has no scientific evidence.

 

So what is your scientific evidence to support your hypothesis that atmospheric CO2 has no effect on global temperatures.

 

IOW you have no scientific evidence to support your hypothesis that atmospheric CO2 from human activity has no effect on global temperatures, and just continue with your usual bluff and guff and straw grasping. https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2021/02/25/carbon-dioxide-cause-global-warming/

 

The evidence for Co2 effect on global temperatures was first posited by svante Arrhenius over two centuries ago (1896) and yet there are people out there who still have not caught up with the science.

 

(((Sigh)))

This is about confirmation of atmospheric modelling
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releas...hat the temperatures,night side of the planet.

 

Did you have a point or just a sigh?

 

Read the link and yeah I had a point - sorry you missed it

 

You made that up. Provide a post # to my post where I stated any such thing. You argue against these strawmen because you cant touch my actual arguments.

 

I did. Venus is so hot that a drop of water has likely never existed on the planet. String together a few words if you can and make a relevant point because the absence demonstrates you dont have one.

 

IOW the atmospheric CO2 from human activity has increased global warming.

The only person you are trying to convince with your continual guff and bluff is just yourself, and would not even convince a banana let alone my cat.

 

Do you have any scientific evidence to support your hypothesis that there has never been a drop of water on Venus? Or are you still just grasping at straws?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Venus

 

Ad Hom - always know when the opposition has run out of factual argument - they resort to ad Homs

 

She didn’t read the link either - Venus would have had cloud cover but that in and of itself would have accelerated atmospheric warming hence my point about climate modelling

 

Couldnt find a post of mine, could ya. You demonstrate my point. You set up strawman after strawman to knock them down. Getting old. Why not respond to the substance of my post instead of strawmen and your silly IOW interpretations

 

LOLOL You cant comprehend your own article. Venus has cloud cover, but its so friggin hot that they can only form on the dark side of the planet.

Did Venus ever have oceans? | ScienceDaily

Like I said and still stands -

 

You cant comprehend your own article. Like I said, "Venus is so hot that a drop of water has likely never existed on the planet. String together a few words if you can and make a relevant point because the absence demonstrates you dont have one."

And you are only further demonstrating you dont have a relevant point, just irrelevant tangents.

 

Why yes I do

Did Venus ever have oceans? | ScienceDaily

 

So what is your scientific evidence to support your hypothesis that there has never been a drop of water on Venus? And if so, where did the water in Venus's atmosphere come from?

 

Which is why Venus has a surface temperature over 450 degrees from the green-house effect of atmospheric CO2, and why atmospheric CO2 from human activity has also increased global temperatures on Earth.

 

AGAIn my point is that the climate modelling is accurate

please respond to what I wrote instead of what you think I might have written