Pakistan warns U.S. of "disastrous consequences" for any more bin Laden-style raids

Pakistan harbored OBL and the ISI financed the 9-11 attacks.

 

Makes no difference, does not mean squat to the interests of the USA. Pakistan does not supply the weapons for terrorist, nor do they support the terrorist Navy and terrorist Air Force. Because it does not exist. Media hype is what exists. Following the news commentators is not thinking independently, and leads people astray from real issues, and elicits emotional response vs. intellectual interpretation and analysis.

 

Again I reflect:

Amazing how people cower in fear because of a few nut bags.

Pakistan is not a evil country, they are part of the UN and have aided other countries and have supported the US Army in Somalia and Bosnia, and other theaters of operation.

Once the troops are back, small pockets of counter-terrorism units along with the CIA will be the key into fighting terrorism or any other fear-ism the USA has. Not full on military occupation. At least for 10-15 years. Hopefully the DCIC (Dick Cheney Industiral Complex) will not be around by then.

If the USA does any form of colonialization, it will be through the sales of fast food, junk food, soda, and pharmaceuticals, the same stuff we watch during the Broadcast news, and sports on TV.

That is the only thing the Pakisatans have to worry about. They got imunization for the VD Colonialist bring.

 

no wonder your flag is the most burnt

 

Yes figments of our imagination are blowing up people in mass all across the globe.

Pakistani intelligence financing the 9-11 attacks and sheltering the 9-11 ringleader is of no interest to the U.S.? You must be (*)(*)(*)(*)ing joking.

 

According to Noam Chomsky the USA is a failed Rogue state - cant really argue with that

 

According to Noam Chomsky the Khmer Rouge were just misunderstood and there's nothing antisemitic about holocaust denial, he is a first rate propagandist but a propagandist none the less.

 

I think they have realized if we fight them there, we don't have to fight them here. Have you ventured anywhere along the southern border of the US lately? Its more swiss than cheese!!!! If we can keep them busy thousands of miles away, we can avoid having to close our boarders and turn the US into a prison...

 

<en masse> Not 'in mass'. It's French.

Always happy to educate.

 

Ah those old pals of America, the Khmer Rouge, whom the US financed, endorsed and supported after the humiliation America suffered when the hated Vietnamese overthrew the government in Cambodia and installed one of their own.
So America, in a fit of foot-stamping pique, gave Pol Pot money and arms to fight the Vietnamese.
You could never accuse the US of double standards, could you?

 

Well, if you actually believe a friend is always a friend... and don't believe that sometimes the enemy of your friend is your friend.. your not going to make it in this world.

 

And how long do you think it would take for the US and Nato to capture and destroy their stockpile in such a situation?

What about India or China?

 

I don't think there are any Pakistanis on our Southern border... nor Taliban nor Al Qaeda.

What's your evidence otherwise?

 

Exactly...

 

No question in my mind that Pakistan is a treacherous ally.

2400 Americans have died fighting in Afghanistan and the Pakis are playing a double game?

I wouldn't want to be in Obama's shoes, but I think he needs to take a real hard line with those b*stards.

 

Is this the same Noam Chomsky who denied the Cambodian democide?

Double-flush your cred...

 

I sure hope you never accuse anyone of spreading propaganda, because you're bloated with it yourself.

 

He did not deny the Cambodian genocide

 

They can't do anything. Let them threaten.

 

You misunderstand... I think WE should do something to jerk a knot in their tails.

 

Threatening to cut aid until a full investigation is done on their gov't, by thenselves and allowing to do our own investigation would be a good start. We could use them as an ally. But they aren't being an ally with their two faced bull.

 

That's a start.. Good idea.

 

Surprising what the mere mention of cutting off aid will do. Kinda like talking to a lid. 'If you do that, I'll take away your Blackberry for a month!"

 

ignoring them is actively annoying and, in my opinion, appropriate.

 

Sure. Cut aid. Who have we been aiding anyway? I would not be surprised if some of our aid had gone directly into Osama's pocket.