China can Field an Army of 200 million men

Chinese have an unlimited surplus of young fighting age men with no wives to be able to send anywhere in the world it is fact that they have boasted that they can field an army of 200 million men. China has had a long history of being the economic trading superpower of the world, perhaps they are attempting to rule the world economically again. Can we stop it? We do have a large army but we are already sick of these resource wars.

World leaders and financial people always think that China is 1.3 billion or 1300 million people economy and they say China is very important for the world economic growth.

World people forget that a country with 1300 million people can build an army of 300 million or 400 million soldiers. Country with high population will have military ambitions and desire to rule the world financially or militarily.

Look on both sides of the road/street before you cross it.

If China has 700 million men and China loses 300 million men and 100 million women in big wars then China will have 400 million men and 400 million women. This is perfect for future population explosion. China will remove/abolish one-child policy.

No need for logistics. China will start conquering countries close to its border and they will keep moving ahead for the world. Similar to what Hitler did in year 1939.

 

How can starving people invade?

 

China's leaders are profit minded - you can control a region economically with far more ease and profit than occupying it militarily.

When will you understand this: China is a non-issue. We should be cooperating with them and westernising them.

 

They have trouble transporting troops within their own country, let alone anywhere in the world.

 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Are you suggesting that they just live off the land and fight with rocks they find along the way?

No need for logistics LOL!

 

China would rather have those men and women at work...

 

Just use UPS:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mRAHa_Po0Kg"]YouTube - ‪UPS: We ♥ Logistics Commercial‬‏[/ame]

 

It's 2011, not 1995.

 

China has more men than women.

That might make them the homosexual capital of the world someday if it isn't already.

So a war that burns off a few hundred million excess men might do China some good.

 

I don't think putting men together makes them gay.

 

too bad they have no navy or air force and this is not 700 BC.

 

Impossible. That would cost over 50X more than the US money owed to China. Proposterus fears.

The only thing you have to fear is fear itself.

 

Some estimates of China's immense "militia." There are tens of millions of young men and women moving around the countryside looking for work, living in temp shelters, footloose and with a deep anger about their fate of being shut out of the ancient, sacred family tradition they share with all Chinese, The unattached mobs of young men have always been tender boxes. This is so immense it is hard to grasp its implications. Since China is allying with Russia, Pakistan, Iran, and central Asia with all of that oil and gas, it's a potentially great global shift, if they can solve their bureaucracy problems.

The Chinese et al. will probably buy gold quietly and slowly to avoid rapid price hikes. It will be hard to detect directly, but people like Soros and Faber might have sources to watch. This could become a massive move toward a new currency base to escape the U.S. Fed's tsunami of trash paper and its Global Inflation Bubble.

 

I think you take 100 million Chinese men with no women for them to boink and they might start looking good to each other instead.

 

This thread is the reason why so many fools have framed the discussion on how to fight China; rather than to cooperate and work with..

 

China has "warned in unequivocal terms that any attack on Pakistan would be construed as an attack on China", The News daily quoted diplomatic sources as saying.

The warning was formally conveyed by the Chinese foreign minister at last week's China-US strategic dialogue and economic talks in Washington, it said.

For his part, Gilani reiterated Pakistan's support for its policy of 'One China' and said his country fully supports China on the issues of Taiwan and Tibet.

During her briefing today Jiang skirted questions about Pakistan-China signing new defence agreements. Asked about assertions by Pakistan's Ambassador to China Masood Khan before Gilani's arrival that new defence deals would be signed, she said the two sides signed agreements in economy, technology, finance and energy resources.

"As to specific cooperation, please refer to relevant companies," she said, adding that China is actively implementing pledges to help pro-disaster reconstruction and exerting utmost to help tide over difficulties."

China on Thursday said the international community "must respect" Pakistan's sovereignty, tacitly confirming reports that it has asked the US not to violate Islamabad's territorial integrity, following the killing of Osama bin Laden.

Asked about reports that China has asked US during its recently concluded strategic dialogue with Washington to respect Pakistan's sovereignty as Islamabad came under heavy pressure after bin Laden's killing, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Jiang Yu told media here that "sovereignty and territorial integrity of Pakistan must be respected."

"We believe that Pakistan has made great contribution to international counter-terrorism efforts, as well as huge sacrifices. The international community should understand and support Pakistan's efforts to restore national stability and develop its economy," she said.

http://articles.economictimes.india...an-s-ambassador-pakistan-china-pakistan-media

 

The Chinese are not idiots, they will let the USA tax payer pay for all those conquring around the world. Then, they will capitalize on the financial markets of those countries through trade and investment, and soon those countries will owe the Chinese trillions of dollars.

This is not the 1950s. The world has changed. The only countries who go by the 1950s way of life is the religious ones, like Muslim, Catholic, and Isreal countries.

Step into the 21st century, move into the year 2011. Get a cell phone and learn how to use it.


Here is a lesson in todays history of the 2000s, China has been emerging for the past 10 years to a superpower. However, the USA tax payer pays for the military to police the world. While the USA spent over $40%GDP on police actions througout the 1990s, Egypt and the Arab World became owners of about 28% of America, and we still owe them billions. Now, year 2011, the USA owes China Trillions of dollars, and has become China's economic boy. Now China owns the USA. Currently the USA has no spunk left in the world's order to invade or start some stuff with even the most smallest conflict in the Mid Esst. If anythng, the Mid east countries will ally with China vs the USA. Because of the ties the USA has to Isreal, the other Arab World countries woul benifit greatly from the economic and finacnial power of CHINA.

So if you fear a war, your fears are misguided, you should be fearing that your simple American job will be worth less than the production of a Chinese worker in China.

 

I don't mind working with China.

My suggestion is balanced trade where China agrees to buy as much from America as it sells to us which would ease our balance of payments deficit.

That's not anti-China in the least.

 

Posturing, nothing more. The Chinese are to intelligent to go to war over Pakistan's sake.

 

Or the US economy could retool to fill the niches that China lacks.

 

Yes, you attack China or an ally of China; you get attacked. Isn't that how the world works? Or do you expect to be able to invade nations freely?

 

That's forcing trade; it's anti-free-market; why would Americans want something that opposes freedom.

 

That's not a very helpful suggestion.

Because eventually China will not even need service jobs from America.

 

As long as China does not infest their country with Jewish broadcast media, they should do OK. Once the Jewish corporate media takes hold of thier country, they will have acces to use media to influence politicians and corporations for their own greedy financial benifit at the expence of the people.

As you can see, the USA boradcast media has a monopoly on the politicans and the way less intellignet and fearfull Americans view the world.

The Majority of Americans are not too bright and buy into anything they are told, regardless if it is true or not.

 

Then I guess America's (*)(*)(*)(*)ed then.