Obama's Re-Election Team Says Rick Perry Easiest To Beat........Not Governor Palin

Rick Perry seen easier for Obama to beat. http://news.yahoo.com/rick-perry-seen-easier-obama-beat-011926582.html


As a Political Mudslinger, I believe the Obama re-election team couldn't be more right. They want Perry and they want him bad to challenge the president and they know he is littered with problems that could be exposed on the national scene. You see, it makes sense. Perry hasn't been vetted by the Obama supporting liberal media at a national level. Right now Perry has been exposed as a flip flopper like Bachmann and Romney have been. Perry's recent statements has even turned the GOP against him and Obama and crew see him as a easy target for victory in 2012. Now on the other hand when it comes to Governor Palin who will announce her candidacy on Sept 3rd, it's a different story. She has been vetted at a national level over the past 3 years and I believe 24 thousand emails were gone through over 2 months ago and she came out squeaky clean. If you remember, Governor Palin went out and hammered Obama's policies during the midterms and handed democrats their asses on a silver platter with her endorsements last Nov 4th. The Obama re-election team realizes what a threat she is and this was witnessed by President Bill Clinton who saw what political power she had developed and went to national TV to warn democrats to "Do not underestimate this woman. She is resilient like me." prior to election day. As a Political Mudslinger, unfortunately he was right. In closing, Obama's re-election team fear Sarah Palin entering the race as his rival.

 

Do any of you agree with Obama's re-election team?

 

Nowhere does the article even mention Palin. Welcome back Apuzzo.

 

And for good reason the article didn't. Apuzzo? I'm at a loss here.

 

Obama is the easiest to beat. No contest.

 

and certainly not Ron Paul.

 

You mean the elite, establishment Republicans.

The George Bush crowd like Karl Rove.

Is that who libs are teaming up with now to help them run the country?

I think the far left is worrying about the strength of our candidate far too much.

We have over six months until the GOP primary and if there is any problem with Perry he will not get the nomination.

So relax libs.

We'll give you a good run for your money in the general election.

 

Here's my take on it. If you really believe this, then I don't want to hear any more whining about Perry. Because you're saying that you clearly don't see him as a threat. So just sit back and grab a cold one and let it happen. Coast your way to victory. Because the next time you get your panties in a twist, you will be exposing your fears for what they truly are. Which is what I believe you will do.

In short, I'm calling your bluff. Prove me wrong.

 

I'm thinking the Willingham issue is the one that will eventually tank Perry's campaign. He might seem like a strong candidate now, but I will be relatively surprised if he wins the nomination.

 

I'm having trouble keeping up with all the lib complaints about Perry.

Who did he rape or kill in Wlllingham?

 

The George Bush crowd like Karl Rove.

Karl said that Perry was not hurt by the statement about the Fed Chairman.

As far as running out and cutting the throat of anybody that Barry's team think that they can beat; I think that they may lie, cheat, fake polls or whatever they have to do to get the weakest person running as the GOP person. They aren't about to give us a clue as to who they really want to go against.

They will lie and the MSM will support them. I also take exception with the notion that Perry hasn't been vetted after all of the elections he has won it a pretty red state. Our Travis county DA would have pressed charges against Perry before now if there was the slightest thing to go after him on. So far we have the killing of a rabid coyote and he prayed for rain.

 

It's called reverse psychology. Obama is pissing in his pants over Perry.

 

He didn't rape or kill anyone.

What happened is that Cameron Todd Willingham was most likely executed wrongfully.

Perry was asked to commute Willingham's death sentence for allegedly burning down his house to kill his children. Perry refused. At the time, the evidence pointed fairly strongly to him.

A few years after his execution, new evidence came to light that implied Willingham was innocent after all. The judges that were going to rule on a posthumous appeal were conveniently replaced right before the case was set, and the new judges turned down the request.

It seems pretty clear that Perry was willing to bury a wrongful execution case to save face.

That's pretty (*)(*)(*)(*)ing of his character.

 

OK.

What the commission found was that 18 years after the event the commission thinks Willingham could not be convicted today.

But he was convicted 18 years before the commission review and executed 5 years before the commission.

This is much to-do about nothing by people who simply oppose the death penalty under any circumstances.

 

Wrongfully executing someone is "much to do about nothing?"

 

If then Governor Bill Clinton could execute a man with brain damage, I think Perry is good.

THE 1992 CAMPAIGN: Death Penalty; Arkansas Execution Raises Questions on Governor's Politics
By PETER APPLEBOME
Published: January 25, 1992

http://www.nytimes.com/1992/01/25/u...as-execution-raises-questions-governor-s.html


What is interesting is that all the Dems have in the beginning of a campaign for an incumbent is negative attacks. That tells us that they KNOW that Obama is in the hole already.


_

 

Ironically, Obama can beat neither Perry nor Palin.

 

I really appreciate the Obama Re-Election Gang trying to help the Republicans pick a candidate that will be Obama. I would never ever suspect they're scared to death of Gov. Perry, are praying to run against Sarah Palin, and are lying through their teeth. I'm sure President Obama would not tolerate their lying. Never. Never, ever.

 

Obama is going to hang himself. No need for him to even think about beating anyone else.

 

Eighteen years later no one really knows if he was wrongfully executed or not.

He had a trial and was convicted.

Then 10 years later his lawyers are filing a zillion appeals, as the professional anti-death penalty crowd does.

Which are turned down and he gets executed.

Now 7 years after that a committee says that they cannot find enough evidence to convict him.

Maybe so since science has advanced over the years but no one knew that in 2004.

But three children are also dead and chances are better than 50/50 that he killed them even if the record is more doubtful now than it was then.

 

Only chance Fuhrer/Emperor Child Obama has if he suspends the election and declares a National Crisis (as in him losing), I'm sure many d-baggers here would rejoice. Yet I'm sure he will try something in that nature but he is such a loser I seriously doubt he'll get away with it, at least lets hope. I'm convince that his pathological narcissism will convince him its for the good of the Nation.

 

Hey,if you all think Perry will be easy to beat in 2012,then by all means chill,relax.Obama will win by a landslide,right?
But what happens IF it becomes a Perry/Palin ticket?Or Palin /Perry ticket?
Will that sound the alarms at Obama headquarters?
Or Christie/Perry? Perry/Rubio?Palin/Rubio?

 

just replay his prayer meetings...er...speeaches. That's scary to the average American voter.

HILARIOUS. Michael Steele endorsed more winners that quitter Palin - why don't you give him credit?[/QUOTE]


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhMepzqJvIw"]Sarah Palin Battle Hymn - The Original Version! - YouTube[/ame]

 

It doesn't matter who Obama runs against, he is going to lose. his numbers all over are dropping, more bad news on the horizon as a 2nd recession is hitting all what was warned about.

Obama's plan is to spend more money, which won't go over well with the American people.

 

Apparently it wasn't someone's kid in employ of the Government.

If it were then these libs would be telling us all to just relax, it's just sex.