Obama's Re-Election Team Says Rick Perry Easiest To Beat........Not Governor Palin

Obama is finished even if Mickey Mouse were too enter the race.

Obama should be Impeached for the FAST AND FURIOUS Gun Runner Scandal he knew about.
His crooked ATF Justice Department head Eric Holder. He needs to be fired and placed in prison.
No man is above the law.

Rick Perry is our next President.

 

Right
And these Libs are preaching to us about "wrongful execution".What about the guns that the Obama administration sent to Mexico that were used to kill our Border Agents?These are the same "life loving Libs" that had no problem seeing OBL executed,or
have no problem with a doctor executing an "innocent" fetus that did no wrong.
Hypocrisy from the Left rears its ugly head again.

 

Pay-lyin is not even running for president. Only a fool would somehow think she is running for president. In fact, Paylin failed to get big oil what they wanted and has not done anything at governer nor has she done any favors for the major corporations that run the USA government. Her good looks and cosmotology degree will only make it so far in the real world of politics.

Perry on the other hand, has financial backing of investment corporations, insurance industry, the big food corporations, Big oil, and soon to be the manufacturing corporations of the south. He did them favors while governer, and geve them government access. Now, those corporations will stop at nothing to get their puppet head in so they can capitalize on all the money they can take from the taxpayer and consumer. You thought Booooosh had croneys, this Perry guy makes the Boooooosh family look like corporate weasels.

 

Do I detect a pattern here?

 

I disagree. He shouldn't have won the last election. His secrecy and lack of any sort of track record helped him but it didn't help him nearly as much as the Republicans running Senator McCain. A seantor who's political claim to fame was co-authoring a horrible bill on campaign financing? Get real. It certainly didn't build a good turnout.

Obama cannot win the 2012 election but the Republicans are fully capable of losing it. I suspect running Governor Palin, whom I respect, would be one way. That's why the Democrats are urging her.

Listening to Democrats makes as much sense as having Hitler giving advice to General Eisenhower just before D-Day. "Boy, Ike it would be stupid to invade at Normandy. You should go for Pas-de-Calais."

 

First of all, tell me what big oil wanted from Palin that you say they didn't get? Second, what favors was she expected to do for these major corporations? Third, tell me what companies are giving financial backing to Perry?

 

That last bit is easy:

TABLE 2: Noteworthy Contributors to PERRY, RICK
Noteworthy Contributor Years Records ↓Total↓
REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION Conservative Policy Organization 2006-2010 4 $4,000,100
PERRY HOMES Home Builders 2000-2010 41 $2,306,999
CONTRAN CORP Banks & Lending Institutions 2004-2010 12 $1,020,050
AT&T Telecom Services & Equipment 2002-2010 171 $692,195
FRIEDKIN COMPANIES Automotive 2004-2010 23 $662,513

http://www.followthemoney.org/datab...html?uc=3156&gclid=CITym7Sz4KoCFY9S7AodIGap9w

 

Hahaha....that's what I was gonna say!

 

dont worry, the mods will "somehow" delete this thread like the deleted all the "McCain/Palin are going to win" threads so there wont be any proof to nail you with.....

 

Oil companies work hard, produce a necessary product, and employ a lot of people.

Apparently liberals are not smart enough to work with the oil companies as Palin does rather than against them as Obama and his flunkies do.

 

Mac, if you care at all about holding government accountable, the least you can do is support the investigation of a case like this. When a politician uses his power to bury the investigation of something that might make him look bad, that should concern you -- especially when that investigation could lead to confirm that someone innocent got killed by the state.

Personally, I support the death penalty. However, I also want the government to be held accountable if it accidentally executes the wrong person. I would hope you consider that to be an important thing as well.

 

How can anyone be held accountable 21 years later?

In fact, if the state now thinks he is innocent based on new scientific knowledge what good does that do the guy now?

He's dead.

What happens is that we set the bar so high that just saying he can't be convicted does not mean he is innocent of the crime.

 

That's because she's all about helping out the little guy. She didn't help out Big Oil when she was our governor because that oil belongs to all Alaskans, not to the oil companies. They must pay a tax if they want to drill our oil out of the ground. This is written into the Alaska Constitution. You sound like a corporate whore.

 

Obama knows his days in office are numbered.

I just hope he does nothing worst than what he already has. His loose free spending and sending our dollars overseas to muslim nations has helped kill our financial woes.

Can someone take the nations checkbook away from his ass.

 

Mac, the investigation isn't for the benefit of the dead. It's for the benefit of avoiding future wrongful executions.

It's also for the relatives of the wrongfully killed. Imagine what it would be like for you to have your brother or son executed for a crime that you later have reason to believe wasn't actually committed by him.

Isn't that something important enough to investigate? Would you not want to definitively know if your relative was a murderer or not?

 

That seems to have been solved already.

The commission says that due to scientific advances he could not be found guilty today.

 

Whenever someone mentions a name that is "easy to beat" this should be seen as the opposite. This is the candidate most feared, or the name wouldn't come up at all.

 

Feared ha Perry is the love child of Tammy faye Baker ,this guy going nowhere

 

Haha sure, keep telling yourself that as we watch the media scrambling for Perry mud stories.

 

So, when the state finds someone guilty and later determines that evidence is inconclusive but the defendant has been executed, doesn't that justify compensation for the relatives?

 

No.

The defendant got a fair trial and was judged guilty by a jury of his peers.

If the trial were held today there might have been a different verdict but that has nothing to do they guy's relatives.

The relatives were not executed so why are they entitled to money?

This is just an attack on the death penalty.

But I think if we had the record there have been more innocent people killed by criminals who were released from prison on a technicality than innocent people who were wrongfully executed.