Hugh Hewitt: Big donors won't back Cain

Hugh Hewitt on his radio show said today that even if Cain is the nominee, big donors won't back him. Therefore out only 2 choices are Romney and Perry. Note that Hugh is a huge Romney supporter, and even wrote a book on Romney. And he know that Romney crushes Perry head to head. But I'm wondering if there's any truth about this claim he's making. Why won't big donors back Cain, even if he's the nominee. Wondering of anyone has some knowledge about this.

 

Romney is too liberal, if not a marxist. Tea Partiers vote Cain or Bachmann. I implore you.

 

there is no evidence that Romney crushes Perry head to head. If the anti-Romney forces coalesce around one candidate, Romney is defeated.

 

Understood, just wondering if there's any truth to the idea that Romney and Cain are the only viable choices.

 

Perry is tossed burnt toast.
Willard Romney has flip-flopped every day of his life, and is Mormon.
Cain's 999 is all about killing off Medicare and Medicaide.

Palin's lookin' F'n hot again, eh?

 

Thanks for your expressed hatred toward Cain. Do you always wear fear on your sleeve like this?

 

Well, if true I would say that not being in debt to big money is probably a good thing at this point in time in US history. Look what is has wrought so far...$7 trillion to the banker elite.

And, it doesn't appear that Cain needs it. According to one poll he's pulled well ahead of Romney and has spent about a quarter of what ol' Mitt has.

But you answer your own question. Hewitt is a Romney man and likely to smear anybody else.

Doesn't pass the smell test

 

If Cain is the GOP candidate he will get massive funding, the donors wont have a choice.

 

If that's what you call truth, sure, works for me. Who would care? Your guys are done.

 

Seriously,stop listening to the pundits.

 

That's what I would think. Yet he expressly said no, they won't back him. Very strange.

 

Something about it just doesn't.