Man jailed for racist internet posts.

yeah - people shouldn't freak. And police should not be thought police.

 

You blokes take the cake, you post a link to prove your point but if you had of read it it wouldn't have been posted because you DONT want to see the truth.

Tell you what, just write a whole heap of garbage and post it, oh sorry, you lot have been doing that already.

 

The only evidence of an beings being in Australia 60,000 yrs ago was the MUngo man woman.(non aboriginals)

There is absolutely not 1 shred of evidence of Aboriginals being here longer than a couple of thousand at most.

The Tasmanian Aboriginals were not related bioligically to the mainland Aboriginals.

If you want to find out about true Aboriginal history feel free to visit Kieth Windshuttles fabrication of abporiginal history at his sydneyline website.

 

Lets not forget that the cultural marxist liars tried to hide this information and literally had the Kennewick man site carpet bombed.Not to mention that a forensic scientist identified kennewick man as caucasoid.Which can be proven by testing a single hair follicle.

Kennewick, Penon, Moneverde, Solutreans-the evidence just keeps mounting that whites are the First Americans.


[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maziRFPYU14"]Ice Age Columbus, Who Were The First Americans? - YouTube[/ame]

[ame]http://http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Iq-kC-lJWw[/ame]

[ame]http://http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1fDjLSaOCQ&feature=related[/ame]

[ame]http://http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nnvCabSlpQ&feature=related[/ame]

[ame]http://http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=pj-hqDFX-Ug&feature=related[/ame]

[ame]http://http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=teh90FTIKec&feature=related[/ame]

[ame]http://http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbayBEbIEwc&feature=related[/ame]

[ame]http://http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rvgh6PyWHxc&feature=related[/ame]

This last link puts the time line back at least 30,000 years before the remains that are chronicled in the first video to dates up to 50,000 years in the past. It makes it interesting in that the out of Africa theory sets the earliest African migrations into Europe at 60,000 to 80,000 years ago, and yet there were people in the America's 50,000 years ago.

http://http://www.sciencedaily.com/r...1118104010.htm

I don't think whites evolved along side the Negro. As our knowledge of the ancient inhabitants of Earth advances I believe this fact will be born out. This article is from 2004, and I have seen nothing else on this evidence. I guess it would be very unpopular if the evidense suggests whites and blacks evolved in differenct places and at different times. We all know those in charge of science today don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*)ed about the truth, They have an agenda to push,science be (*)(*)(*)(*)ed

 

The lengths the cultural marxist liars will go to to try and stop this from coming out.

The Spirit Cave Man Lawsuit (9,400 YO American Mummy)
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1713887/posts

The Spirit Cave Man Lawsuit

NEWS: The Court has remanded the matter back to the Bureau of Land Management for further proceedings. See Order (posted 9/25/06)

-- The text of the Conclusion

In July 2000 the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) issued a determination that the Spirit Cave Man could not be culturally linked to the claiming Fallon-Paiute Shoshone tribe. The tribe filed a lawsuit asking the Federal Court to review their claim under NAGPRA.

In their determination, the BLM assumed that the Spirit Cave Man was Native American based solely on his age. In the Kennewick Man lawsuit, the Ninth Circuit found that relying on age alone was insufficient to establish remains as Native American for the purposes of NAGPRA. The Ninth Circuit Court's opinion in the Kennewick Man lawsuit applies to the Spirit Cave Man lawsuit.

 

Kennewick Man

Caucasoid Life in North America

Caucasoid traits in the Kennewick Man -- with his long narrow face, slight overbite, prominent chin... he looked much like Patrick Stewart... and other recent finds (revealed throughout the rest my research) challenge the conventional view that the first settlers of the Americas were Asian predecessors of Indians (the Beringian Bridge theory). The Fork Rock Cave in Oregon has been in the middle of ongoing new discoveries. The cave itself is small -- only thirty-five feet wide and sixty-five feet long. It was here in 1938 that about seventy pairs of sandals made of sagebrush were discovered by Luther S. Cressman.11 Radio-carbon dating technology dated the sandals at nine thousand years old (fortunately, the sandals were preserved until radio-carbon dating was invented). Charcoal was also found with a radio-carbon date indicating it was thirteen thousand two-hundred years old.12 The sagebrush sandals were intricately woven, and the other items found in the cave included projectile points, scrapers, drills, a wooden trigger for a trap, small pieces of basketry and awls to make leather (or tailored clothing for kinfolk of the Kennewick man), all of which indicated skilled workers.13 These differ vastly from Indian artifacts both in ancient North America and in modern Indian findings.

http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/hive/Kennewic.htm

 

I read a neat little book about this very thing a few years back called America B.C. by Barry Fell, pretty good book.

Another one is called Dead Men's Secrets by Johnathan Grey.

Strange thing is that many Indian tribes also speak of White people being in America, yet lefty cultural marxist idiots still want to deny it.

Whites are also the first inhabitants of new Zealand and western China as well.

We were even in Australia thousands of years ago as well.(not before the 5th wave of mainland aboriginal invaders though)...i wonder if nobis has ever heard of the Australian pygmies who the mainland aboriginal 5th wave of invaders used to steal their land and such.

Also the original Ainu tribe were caucasoids from Japan before being mongrelised out of existence.

 

You do realise that Aboriginals and Indians also stole territory by force dont you?

You do realise just like many white tribes the many indian tribes could be savages, cannibals or peaceful peoples as well dont you?

When it eventually comes out that Whites were the original inhabitants of the Americas are we going to claim land rights to?

Can we also blame the asian indian invaders of wiping us original white inhabitants out as well because that is what it looks like to me.

Considering many of the brutal indian rituals can we also blame them for barbaric mass murders?

Of course the cultural marxists who have told these lies about white history are trying ever so hard from these facts ever becoming mainstream...

Also why is this parts of history not taught in schools?Is it because it doesnt fit into the cultural marxists WHITE GUILT history education, you know slavery,holocaust,colonialism,indian massacres etc etc ?

Their should be a history revolution to get the cultural marxist scumbags out of our education systems.

They are manipulating child abusers.

teaching white children to feel sorry and hate their history and teaching non whites to blame the white man for all the wrongdoings in their history..

For example why dont they teach our White Aussie children the fact that the reason whites wanted to rid Tasmania from the Aboriginals was because they were violent savages who killed more white people than white people killed them?Imagine trying to raise a family with wild coyotes in your backyard?

SAY NO TO WHITE GUILT.

 

For the edification of those of you with enough brains to read and understand. Of course those bitter and twisted will reply with the usual garbage, I prefer to believe common sense and science myself.

Common sense and a little knowledge of basic biology, you know, the definition of what a species is, tells us that they are definitely the same species.

Science confirms this.

http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/1286/dna-confirms-aboriginal-australian-origins

http://www-personal.une.edu.au/~pbrown3/AusOrigins.html

http://austhrutime.com/aboriginal_australia.htm

http://ausanthrop.net/

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/rock-art-redraws-our-history/2008/09/19/1221331206960.html

http://www.upfromaustralia.com/50yearofcavp.html

 

In which case I can incite people to hunt you down and slay you, without you complaining!

 

there is rock art dated and far older than you are claiming

who wrote it

i dunno

Some artist dont sign there work!

his post had more quality than debating the origination of the aboriginal population. the bottom line is, they were there before the english

ie.... maybe the batman treaty was with batman!

 

when you show evidence of a lineage of white monkeys, then you have a case.

but if you think god created man in the sense of adam and eve, then you just took the pride and flushed it.

all mankind came from the evolution of life.............. if you want to go over that chain, then make another thread. perhaps grab a shovel.

 

oh for god's sake - go back to school and do some junior high school science, kid!

 

What a meaningless post void of even a shred of substance.

 

and your post had something in it?

i saw the case of advice

 

So who did those Orientals replace when they crossed the bridge? As much as I can sympathize for them they were basically primitive bushmen.

 

Some are closer to that change than others IMO. The evidence is irrefutable. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhxqIITtTtU"]Ape With AK-47 - YouTube[/ame]

 

Sparsely at best until mother queen whore england sent their undesirables and criminals.

 

Yes they really got it wrong didn't they. They should have over farmed the land until it was nearly incapable of supporting life, raising the salt tables until the salt and minerals crusted on the surface. They should have cut down the forests, like Australia isn't hot enough,. They should have dammed the rivers diverting the water into enormous dams to grow crops that this country was never meant to grow so the could import hoofed animals to desecrate the country.

They should have bred in the millions, used up all the best agricultural lands to build their homes, then tried to farm the interior. They should have developed cars and planes and CO2, Phosphoric and Sulphuric acids to add to the atmosphere. They should have mined the great forests, pulped all the timber, dug up uranium, built reactors, ore smelters. They should have developed an army and wiped the Brits out when they came, enslaving them, abusing and slaughtering them.

They should have sent everything that they catch and harvest overseas so that we can buy it back again at a value added price. They should have invented alcohol, drugs and guns.

But they didn't, it is a good thing we came along eh?

 

Why not ill get the posse ready, come get it...hahahaa

Just know this, there will be reactions caused by your action.

Shuts loud mouths up.

 

(Evolution is a theory not a fact.Show me the missing link, ya bloody fool.i am not a church believer...so dont even try and get into the churches version of life beliefs.While your at it einstein why dont you PROVE we all came from africa, you know your other THEORY.

 

The dating is flawed considerably.

Please tell me why they can date Aboriginal rock cave painting but not the Egyptian (DNA proves the first Egyptians were caucasoid)rock cave paintings?

then get back to me on ya batmen ,off ya head man theory.

 

so you basically understand very little about biological science.

not surprising that.

 

really?

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/new...val-in-australia/story-e6frg8y6-1226144089835

there have been different migration waves - as in other places.

 

you are right.

it is pointless responding to mindless trolls.

I should give it up.