ron paul inspires domestic terrorists

no, among private businesses in all the states

but it's no surprise that you think illegal discrimination is your right

 

It doesn't say that. Show where it says anything about Private businesses.

Sad, but yes. And when those private citizens that don't care for the discriminations a private business is doing, they choose to shop somewhere else. With the way most people think in America today, that discriminatory business would go out of business most of the time.

 

the commerce clause covers private businesses

 

Really? Lets see.

Nope. Doesn't say a single thing about private business sales practices or how the federal government can regulate them. This all has to do with government businesses or sales of government assets, not a thing in there about private business.

 

So, you actually really have no connection between Ron Paul, and these two wackos?
Generalize much? Of course you do.

 

constitutional law is probably not easily understood by simpletons

Heart of Atlanta Motel Inc. v. United States was a landmark United States Supreme Court case holding that the U.S. Congress could use the Constitution's Commerce Clause power to force private businesses to abide by the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/FTrials/conlaw/heartofatlanta.html

 

Yes, a progressive court ruled to expand the meaning of the words to include things they don't say. Sorry, but the founders made the constitution specifically for "simpletons" specifically so the rules were easy to follow. Only those that presume to be more intelligent than others try to change the meaning of the original words.

Just cause the court ruled one way, doesn't make it so. There is NOTHING in the constitution that gives the federal government rule over PRIVATE business. It is sad that you must try to go to a court case to try to get proof that what you seek isn't there, but because of the ruling of the court, "its there is spirit". Just like that whole "Separation of God and state thing".

 

The idea of Ron Paul being a racist has been thoroughly destroyed.

In his own words:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uk7qiY-aoiQ"]Re: Is Ron Paul Racist? - YouTube[/ame]

This video will lead you to several other videos by all kinds of minorities who also disagree with the idea that Ron Paul is racist.

Nice job trying to link Paul with domestic terrorism btw... by not demonstrating a single shred of evidence.

 

despite what you may think, the supreme court is an integral part of the constitution

the mistake you're making here is that most of the founding fathers weren't simpletons and many were sophisticated politicians, diplomats, lawyers and the like, so you may not see many things in the constitution which were included, but not obvious to someone lacking knowledge on the subject

paultards refute that

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCLfJCqIEN8"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCLfJCqIEN8[/ame]

 

And you have your masters in the constitution? Sorry, but even the supreme court can be wrong when stacked with progressive minded cronies.

Why is it that you liberal trolls take the words of someone OTHER than the person themselves? Just cause this guy is as ignorant as you, doesn't mean he is the proper person to speak for Ron.

 

i prefer progress over going back to the robber baron days

you don't know what you're talking about, ron paul attracts people like david duke, don black and randy gray for a reason

actions speak louder than ron's lies

as i said, it's my opinion, based on similarities in views

but there is an endorsement for ron paul on the georgia militia website:

http://www.georgiamilitia.net/RonPaul.htm

 

Progress to the point where the government can tell what to buy, where to buy, who to buy? Sorry, but that is NOT forward into liberty and freedom, that is forward into slavery and oppression call communism or state run "capitalism". Even less people prosper in countries with huge governments than when our government was small back in the so called "robber baron days".

If you want to try that, really? Lets look at who Obama and the democrats keep on their side in the same building as them? Ron Paul isn't caught within 100 miles of these people. He also rejects their ideology publicly. Obama embraces violence and class warfare. Obama cheers for the OWS crowd causing riots in Oakland. But yet you want to make fake bridges to no where and claim RP is responsible for something you have ZERO proof of? Liberals and their contradictions are infuriating. Have a good night troll

 

you don't seem to understand what progress is

and the government hasn't ever told me what to buy, where to buy it or who to buy it from

 

Ok, it is seriously one thing to be endorsed by a group that the candidate never acknowledges, and it is another to support the group. Obama supports OWS, along with his pals the weather under ground, ACORN, Franchises Fox Piven, and the Nation of Islam. See, that is a much better assumption of collusion than some random whako group supporting a candidate who ignore their support.

 

They will with Obamacare. It is going there. It has been leading up to this. This is their progress, the politicians progress, not progress for the people.

 

screw obama, this thread is about ron paul and the nut cases that follow him

you don't know what you're talking about, i already have medical insurance

 

And you are trying to equate Ron Paul for the actions he doesn't support of the people that support him.

Fine, you do, but the politicians are still forcing others to buy something they feel they don't need. Starts with a few.

 

More zionist pig lies........

Those that support obama,cain,romney etc are the true nutcases.....

The people that support Ron Paul are the sensible ones who know that the jew controls the American gov.

Audit the jew fed, Audit the fort knox gold reserves now and arrest the jewish international banksters currently rippping America of its wealth....

Stop foriegn aide to the rogue terrorist state of israel.....

NO MORE JEWISH WARS

 

ron paul is quite deceptive, he defended his racist newsletters in 1996, now he says he didn't write in them

ron paul says he's for term limits, but he's been in office for decades

ron paul says he's against big government, but his district is consistently among the top in texas that takes federal dollars

he's just another double-talking, crooked politician

what do you think of ludwig von mises?

 

Terrorism happens everyday, in all countries.

Government, Wall Street, and Corporations, and all their greed is the terrorism people should fear.

We are nearing the end result of society, and the world.

The environment is almost all but destroyed, and economies will only get worse from here on out.

In fact, everything is literally going extinct, except for one thing, humans. As everything declines in numbers, we are increasing. There isn't enough of anything, for everyone.

You can thank the stupid religions that kept telling people to have more, and more children. Now look at this mess, 7 billion people and counting!

Oh, and you thank Government for never doing anything in the interest of its citizens, and its environment. All the government cared about was taking all the money it could. Now look at this mess, no more money, and ever decreasing shortage in resources.

Screw Government, religion, corporation, wall street, etc.

None of them have ever considered the interests of this world, all were selfish.

 

Where in libertarian philosophy advocates violence?
You seem know absolutely nothing about libertarian view, what so ever.

You're grasping at straws, and it's beyond pathetic.

 

that's just not true

you must be new to the libertarian persuasion

 

...and you must be new to this planet if you think libertarianism promotes violence. You're clueless, my friend.

Remember, it is your Rep/Dem duopoly that drops bombs on third world people and locks Americans in cages for "crimes" where no victim exists. It is the libertarians who want your type to STOP the violence waged against peaceful people.

 

no, i've been here nearly 53 years and i pay attention to the subtext

the political policies advocated by libertarians, often results in violence


here's a quote from the op:

"When it comes to saving the Constitution, that means some people gotta die."

 

Pffft. Political policies advocated by libertarians are usually the RESULT of unwarranted violence perpetrated by statists. The non-aggression principle is a mainstay of libertarian ideology.